Education Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Simulation-Based Experience on the Development of Self-Awareness and Empathic Skill in Nursing Students
This research was planned as a randomized controlled experimental study to determine the effect of simulation training on the acquisition of self-awareness and empathy skills in nursing students.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - 18 years old and over, - Studying in the 4th grade, - Having an AGNO grade point average of 1.80 and above, - It will consist of students who agree to participate in the research. Exclusion Criteria: - Having a health problem that may affect the evaluation of the affective field/receiving treatment, - Repeating courses due to failure in professional main courses, - Refusing to participate in the research or giving up during the implementation process, - Students who graduated from health vocational high school and received associate degree education in the field of health. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa | Istanbul |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC) |
Turkey,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Self-Awareness In Nursing Practice Scale | The scale, developed by Rasheed et al. (2020) to measure the self-awareness level of nurses, was conducted by Tufan and Oskay Sahin (2021), for its validity and reliability in Turkish. The original scale consists of 4 sub-dimensions and 18 items. The Turkish form of the scale consists of 4 sub-dimensions and 15 items. A 6-point Likert scale (always = 5, very often = 4, sometimes = 3, rarely = 2, very rarely =1 and never=0) is used. There is no reverse item in the scale. In the total score evaluation of the scale, the lowest total score is 0 and the highest total score is 75 (Tufan & Oskay Sahin, 2021). | It will be applied in the pre-test before recruitment. It will be applied immediately after the simulation. | |
Primary | Jefferson Empathy Scale for Nursing Students | The scale developed by Hojat et al. (2001), Turkish validity-reliability study was conducted by Yanik and Saygili (2014). The original scale consists of 20 items and 3 dimensions, but the Turkish version has 18 items. It has been reported that the 5th and 18th items in the Turkish scale were removed by the researchers because the factor load was found to be low (Yanik & Saygili, 2014). The 18-item Turkish version of the scale, as in the original, consists of 3 dimensions: Obtaining an Empathic Perspective (9 items), Compassionate Care (7 items) and Viewing from the Patient's Perspective (2 items). The scale is 7-point Likert type and the scores that can be obtained from the Turkish form vary between 18-126. A high score indicates a high level of empathy (Yanik & Saygili, 2014). | It will be applied in the pre-test before recruitment. It will be applied immediately after the simulation. | |
Primary | Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale | The scale developed by Kiersma et al. (2013) was adapted into Turkish by Sahin Bayindir et al. (2022). The original version of the scale consists of 2 subscales (Cognitive Empathy and Affective Empathy) and 15 items. However, in the Turkish adaptation study, two items with low item-total correlation (item 4 and item 15) were removed from the scale. The Turkish version of the scale consists of 2 sub-dimensions and 13 items. The scale is used to evaluate empathy in nursing students and simulation training. Responses to the scale items are scored on a 7-point Likert type (1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Somewhat Disagree, 4=Neither Agree Neither Disagree, 5=Agree Slightly, 6=Agree, 7=Strongly Agree) (Sahin-Bayindir et al., 2022). The internal consistency coefficient of the Cognitive Empathy Subscale of the scale, which was adapted into Turkish, was 0.78; The internal consistency of the Affective Empathy Subscale was 0.74; the internal consistency coefficient of the total scale is 0.85 | It will be applied in the pre-test before recruitment. It will be applied immediately after the simulation. | |
Primary | Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Scale in Learning | The scale was developed by Jeffries and Rizzolo (2006) as 13 items to measure students' simulation activity and self-confidence in learning. Answering the scale for each item; 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Undecided, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly Agree (Franklin et al., 2014). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was carried out by Unver et al. (2017) and the total number of items decreased to 12. | It will be applied immediately after the simulation | |
Primary | The Aging Simulation Experience Survey | The scale was developed by Chen et al. (2011) to assess students' perceptions of older adults. In this quantitative scale, there are 13 items (7-point Likert type, 1=strongly disagreeā¦7=strongly agree) to be filled before and after the activity regarding the experience of older adults in the health system and the structure of this system. Except for 2 items with negative expressions, higher scores were accepted as an indicator of greater understanding and positive perceptions (Chen et al., 2015b). In addition to 13 items, 8 items related to students' experience of navigating the health system as an older adult were reported to be filled only after the activity and student experiences related to the activity were evaluated (Chen et al., 2015a). There is no Turkish adaptation of the scale, it is being adapted into Turkish by the researcher. | It will be applied in the pre-test before recruitment. It will be applied immediately after the simulation. | |
Secondary | Self-Awareness In Nursing Practice Scale | The scale, developed by Rasheed et al. (2020) to measure the self-awareness level of nurses, was conducted by Tufan and Oskay Sahin (2021), for its validity and reliability in Turkish. The original scale consists of 4 sub-dimensions and 18 items. The Turkish form of the scale consists of 4 sub-dimensions and 15 items. A 6-point Likert scale (always = 5, very often = 4, sometimes = 3, rarely = 2, very rarely =1 and never=0) is used. There is no reverse item in the scale. In the total score evaluation of the scale, the lowest total score is 0 and the highest total score is 75 (Tufan & Oskay Sahin, 2021). | 3 weeks after the simulation (after clinical practice) | |
Secondary | Jefferson Empathy Scale for Nursing Students | The scale developed by Hojat et al. (2001), Turkish validity-reliability study was conducted by Yanik and Saygili (2014). The original scale consists of 20 items and 3 dimensions, but the Turkish version has 18 items. It has been reported that the 5th and 18th items in the Turkish scale were removed by the researchers because the factor load was found to be low (Yanik & Saygili, 2014). The 18-item Turkish version of the scale, as in the original, consists of 3 dimensions: Obtaining an Empathic Perspective (9 items), Compassionate Care (7 items) and Viewing from the Patient's Perspective (2 items). The scale is 7-point Likert type and the scores that can be obtained from the Turkish form vary between 18-126. A high score indicates a high level of empathy (Yanik & Saygili, 2014). | 3 weeks after the simulation (after clinical practice) | |
Secondary | Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale | The scale developed by Kiersma et al. (2013) was adapted into Turkish by Sahin Bayindir et al. (2022). The original version of the scale consists of 2 subscales (Cognitive Empathy and Affective Empathy) and 15 items. However, in the Turkish adaptation study, two items with low item-total correlation (item 4 and item 15) were removed from the scale. The Turkish version of the scale consists of 2 sub-dimensions and 13 items. The scale is used to evaluate empathy in nursing students and simulation training. Responses to the scale items are scored on a 7-point Likert type (1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Somewhat Disagree, 4=Neither Agree Neither Disagree, 5=Agree Slightly, 6=Agree, 7=Strongly Agree) (Sahin-Bayindir et al., 2022). The internal consistency coefficient of the Cognitive Empathy Subscale of the scale, which was adapted into Turkish, was 0.78; The internal consistency of the Affective Empathy Subscale was 0.74; the internal consistency coefficient of the total scale is 0.85 | 3 weeks after the simulation (after clinical practice) | |
Secondary | The Aging Simulation Experience Survey | The scale was developed by Chen et al. (2011) to assess students' perceptions of older adults. In this quantitative scale, there are 13 items (7-point Likert type, 1=strongly disagreeā¦7=strongly agree) to be filled before and after the activity regarding the experience of older adults in the health system and the structure of this system. Except for 2 items with negative expressions, higher scores were accepted as an indicator of greater understanding and positive perceptions (Chen et al., 2015b). In addition to 13 items, 8 items related to students' experience of navigating the health system as an older adult were reported to be filled only after the activity and student experiences related to the activity were evaluated (Chen et al., 2015a). There is no Turkish adaptation of the scale, it is being adapted into Turkish by the researcher. | 3 weeks after the simulation (after clinical practice) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04083924 -
Preclinical Medical Student Echocardiography Training American Society of Echocardiography Curriculum
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05013476 -
Tele-Ultrasound: VIrtual Hands-on Education for Novice Users
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03436589 -
The Indiana SNAP-Ed Long-term Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678077 -
Trends in Cohabitation Status, Academic Achievement and Socio-economic Indicators After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
|
||
Completed |
NCT05007704 -
Competencies Required by Anesthesiologists Managing Critically Ill Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT04082845 -
Effect of Web-Based Training With Thyroidectomy Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05335759 -
Coaching Programme for Preceptorship of Undergraduate Nurses' Students
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04959045 -
The Effect of Flipped Classroom Teaching Method on Academic Achievement and Skill Learning Level in Skills Education
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03587233 -
Are Women With Higher Professional Status More Sedentary Compared to Men?
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05086783 -
Video-based Coaching (VBC) in Gynecologic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06046378 -
The Effect of Digital Stories Prepared With Digital Audio File (Podcast) on Midwifery Learning
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04186390 -
Learning Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02377908 -
European Postgraduate Training in Geriatric Medicine
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01720017 -
Impact of Manikin Training on Airtraq Avant Learning Curve in Predicted Difficult Airways
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01001286 -
Questscope Non-Formal Education Impact Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00425295 -
Effectiveness of Human Simulation Training for Medical Crisis Management Skills
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00887185 -
Validation/Dissemination Of A Temporal Bone Dissection Simulator
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04343352 -
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Mobile Application for Parents of Children With Epilepsy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06091462 -
Virtual Reality and Nursing Students and Dementia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05974943 -
The Effect of Problem Solving and Decision Making Training Given to Nurses Managers
|
N/A |