Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04512560
Other study ID # SURG-497-20
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 1, 2021
Est. completion date August 30, 2024

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source Queen's University
Contact Daniel Potter, MD
Phone 613-549-6666
Email dpotter@qmed.ca
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Surgical coaching, defined as a constructive relationship that provides objective feedback to individuals about a broad range of factors influencing operative performance, is a key strategy for integrating adult learning theory into the traditionally didactic arena of surgical education. It is gaining momentum as an area of potential growth and innovation, and may become a more meaningful method of ongoing professional development for practicing surgeons. Effective coaching interactions encourage discussion, provide feedback, affirm positive beliefs and challenge pre-existing assumptions. The effectiveness and uptake of coaching interventions in surgery can be influenced by the identity of the coach, and cultural or individual surgeon attitudes. Surgical coaching has been linked to improvements in technical and procedural skills in both simulated and clinical environments. In 2015, a systematic review of surgical coaching showed a positive impact of surgical coaching interventions on learners' perceptions and attitudes, their technical and nontechnical skills, and their performance measures. The investigators propose to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial of structured remote surgical coaching (SRSC) versus conventional surgical training for laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgery residents at three institutions, in Canada and Australia, to not only provide additional evidence in support of validity and generalizability of a structured surgical coaching intervention for surgery trainees, but also to demonstrate improvement in accuracy of self-assessment of operative performance and the feasibility of remote coaching.


Description:

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of adding a structured remote surgical coaching (SRSC) program to conventional surgery training (CST) versus conventional surgery training (CST) alone on general surgery residents' (1) technical performance, (2) technical errors, and (3) accuracy of self-assessment for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure. Feasibility of conducting remote coaching across different times zones and continents will also be explored. Hypothesis 1: Participation in a SRSC program will result in superior technical skills and fewer technical errors committed during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to CST. Hypothesis 2: Participation in a SRSC program will result in a more accurate self-assessment of participants' technical skills as compared to CST. Hypothesis 3: It will be feasible to coach surgery residents remotely across different time zones and continents. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The investigators will conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial with study participants randomized 1:1 into intervention (SRSC+CST) and control groups (CST). The investigators will use blocked randomization with a block size of 4 and allocation ratio of 1:1 to ensure equal participant distribution over the 24 month continuous recruitment period. STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND RECRUITMENT: The investigators will recruit general surgery residents (PGY 1-5) as study participants. Any resident who routinely performs components of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a primary surgeon (under supervision) and is rotating on a general surgery service will be invited to participate. STRUCTURED REMOTE SURGICAL COACHING (SRSC) PROGRAM (INTERVENTION): Participants randomized to the intervention group will participate in a 3-month SRSC program in addition to CST. They will view a standardized 10-minute video presentation, which will explain the concept of surgical coaching and the purpose of the SRSC program. Surgical coaches will provide structured remote surgical coaching. Credentials and qualifications of each of the coaches are described below (Research Team). Zoom web-conferencing platform (https://zoom.us) will be used for remote coaching. Participants will be asked to provide a video recording of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy that they performed as a primary surgeon prior to the coaching session. Each coach will review the video recording and will identify key themes for discussion. Coaching sessions will be structured using the modified PRACTICE model, will be conducted outside of the clinical environment, and will employ facilitative coaching methods to encourage participants to define specific intra-operative problems and conceptually troubleshoot various solutions. Key observations and discussion points for each session will be recorded in a coaching template. Coaching sessions will be planned to be administered on a bi-weekly basis; however, variability may occur to accommodate residents operating schedule and exposure. The expectation is for each participant to complete three to four coaching sessions each lasting 30-45 minutes. CONVENTIONAL SURGICAL TRAINING (CONTROL): Participants randomized to the control group will continue of their usual general surgery residency training including attending scheduled teaching sessions, and continuing with assigned responsibilities on the ward and in the OR. Participants will be asked to record videos of 5 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures that they performed as a primary surgeon during a 3-month period to mimic the duration of exposure in the intervention group. DEMOGRAPHIC DATA: The investigators will collect age, sex, post-graduate year of training, handedness, number of basic, intermediate and advanced laparoscopic cases performed as a primary surgeon or assisted before and during the study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The investigators will measure technical performance during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the primary outcome. Two assessment scales will be used: the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scale and the Generic Error Rating Tool (GERT) for errors in laparoscopic surgery. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The investigators will explore, using a post-study questionnaire, the subjective perception of the usefulness of the SRSC program and challenges with remote coaching as the secondary outcome. The investigators will also collect feasibility data including duration of time spent on video review, preparation for the coaching session, and conduct of the session by the coach. Participant self-assessment data for their technical performance at baseline and upon the completion of the study will also be collected. BASELINE AND POST-INTERVENTION ASSESSMENT: The 1st and 5th submitted video recording for each study participant will be assessed by a trained rater, blinded to the group allocation and training level of participant, for technical skill and errors using GOALS and GERT scales, respectively. Participants will self-assess their technical performance with the GOALS scale. SAMPLE SIZE: Using clinically relevant effect size of 1.25 and 1:1 allocation ratio for groups, a minimum of 9 participants will be required per group to achieve a power of 0.8 and alpha of 0.05. The investigators will aim to recruit a total of 24 participants (12 per group) to account for possible participant dropout. An interim analysis will be performed once 9 participants have been recruited per group. Recruitment will continue until completion of the interim analysis. DATA ANALYSIS: The investigators will perform descriptive statistical analysis and will assess the normality of data distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For continuous variables with normal distribution, the investigators will use a t-test for independent samples for between group comparisons, and a paired t-test for within group comparisons. For continuous variables with skewed distribution, the investigators will use the Mann-Whitney U test for between group comparisons, and the Wilcoxon rank sign tests for within group comparisons. The investigators will compare categorical data using the Fisher exact test. The investigators will use Spearman correlations to examine the correlation between self-assessment scores and blinded rater scores.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 24
Est. completion date August 30, 2024
Est. primary completion date June 30, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - General surgery residents (PGY 1-5) who routinely perform components of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a primary surgeon (under supervision). Exclusion Criteria: - Individuals with injuries that preclude performance in the operating room will be excluded.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Surgical Training using Structured Remote Surgical Coaching in addition to Conventional Surgical Training
General surgery residents (PGY 1-5) will provide a video recording of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy that they performed as a primary surgeon. The coach will identify key moments or themes for discussion on how to improve technical skills and reduce intra-operative errors during five, 30-45 minute remote coaching sessions .
Surgical Training using Conventional Training Program
General surgery residents (PGY 1-5) will continue their usual residency training.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Queen's University Kingston Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Dr. Boris Zevin

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Skill set during performance of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the operating room Technical skills during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the operating room will be one of the primary outcomes for this study. The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scale will be used to measure this outcome. 90 days
Primary Technical errors made during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the operating room Technical errors during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the operating room will be one of the primary outcomes for this study. The Generic Error Rating Tool (GERT) will be used to measure this outcome. 90 days
Secondary Subjective assessment of the usefulness of SRSC program A post-study questionnaire will be administered to participants in the intervention group to assess their subjective perception of the usefulness of the SRSC program and challenges that they encountered with remote coaching.
A scale for Perception of Usefulness will be used in this post-study questionnaire with a minimum value of 1 indicating not useful at all and a maximum value of 10 indicating very useful.
90 days
Secondary Accuracy of self-assessment Participants' self-assessment scores for technical skill will be compared to the scores assigned by a trained, blinded rater to determine if SRSC improves accuracy of self-assessment 90 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04083924 - Preclinical Medical Student Echocardiography Training American Society of Echocardiography Curriculum N/A
Completed NCT05013476 - Tele-Ultrasound: VIrtual Hands-on Education for Novice Users N/A
Completed NCT03436589 - The Indiana SNAP-Ed Long-term Study N/A
Completed NCT03678077 - Trends in Cohabitation Status, Academic Achievement and Socio-economic Indicators After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Completed NCT05007704 - Competencies Required by Anesthesiologists Managing Critically Ill Patients
Completed NCT04082845 - Effect of Web-Based Training With Thyroidectomy Patients N/A
Completed NCT05335759 - Coaching Programme for Preceptorship of Undergraduate Nurses' Students
Not yet recruiting NCT04959045 - The Effect of Flipped Classroom Teaching Method on Academic Achievement and Skill Learning Level in Skills Education N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03587233 - Are Women With Higher Professional Status More Sedentary Compared to Men? N/A
Recruiting NCT05086783 - Video-based Coaching (VBC) in Gynecologic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT06046378 - The Effect of Digital Stories Prepared With Digital Audio File (Podcast) on Midwifery Learning N/A
Completed NCT04186390 - Learning Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy
Recruiting NCT02377908 - European Postgraduate Training in Geriatric Medicine N/A
Terminated NCT01720017 - Impact of Manikin Training on Airtraq Avant Learning Curve in Predicted Difficult Airways N/A
Completed NCT01001286 - Questscope Non-Formal Education Impact Study Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT00425295 - Effectiveness of Human Simulation Training for Medical Crisis Management Skills Phase 1
Completed NCT00887185 - Validation/Dissemination Of A Temporal Bone Dissection Simulator Phase 2
Completed NCT04343352 - Evaluation of the Efficiency of Mobile Application for Parents of Children With Epilepsy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06091462 - Virtual Reality and Nursing Students and Dementia N/A
Completed NCT05974943 - The Effect of Problem Solving and Decision Making Training Given to Nurses Managers N/A