View clinical trials related to Dual Diagnosis.
Filter by:Dual diagnosis refers to patients with both severe mental illness and substance abuse. Dual diagnosis is therefore a challenging condition to treat, and the group typically represents the most vulnerable individuals in society. Historically, research on dual diagnosis has been underprioritized, and thus, we still do not know enough about how to best assist this vulnerable group. However, new studies indicate that virtual reality programs can reduce anxiety in patients with psychotic disorders. They achieve this by providing access to a virtual therapist and lifelike environments where patients can challenge their thoughts about the dangers of navigating the world. For both psychotic disorders and substance abuse, we know that anxiety often plays a role in the clinical picture. Therefore, anxiety almost always has an impact on dual diagnosis patients, where it is crucial in maintaining substance abuse and functional impairment. Despite this, anxiety is rarely a focus in existing treatment options, as it is too resource-intensive in addition to an already intensive treatment process. This study investigates whether the resource barrier can be overcome and whether hospitalized dual diagnosis patients can experience reduced anxiety, fewer relapses, and better outcomes after discharge when their anxiety is treated through partially automated virtual reality therapy.
Homelessness severely affects health and well-being and is particularly negative for youth. Between 70-95% of youth experiencing homelessness (YEH) report problem substance use and 66-89% have a mental health disorder. Youth appear to be at greater risk for living on the streets or being homeless than adults and are more vulnerable to long term consequences of homelessness. Multiple social determinants of health (SDOH) are uniquely associated with homelessness, driving substance use and adverse mental health consequences. However, limited research has identified pragmatic interventions that have a long-term ameliorating impact on the complex, multi-symptomatic issues among these youth. This study overcomes prior gaps in research through testing a multi-component comprehensive prevention intervention targeting SDOH that may affect biopsychosocial health indicators and longer-term health outcomes. In partnership with a drop-in center for YEH, youth between the ages of 14 to 24 years, will be engaged and randomly assigned to conditions using a dismantling design so that essential intervention components can be efficiently identified. In particular, youth (N = 300) will be randomly assigned to a) Motivational Interviewing/Community Reinforcement Approach + Services as Usual (MI/CRA + SAU, n = 80), b) Strengths-Based Outreach and Advocacy + Services As Usual (SBOA + SAU, n = 80), c) MI/CRA + SBOA + SAU (n = 80) or d) SAU (n=60) through the drop-in center. In order to assess the longer-term prevention effects on substance use, mental health and other outcomes, all youth will be assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24-months post-baseline. The primary goal of this study is to establish the impact of a comprehensive intervention embedded within a system that serves YEH, a community drop-in center, on youth's opioid misuse and disorder, other substance misuse and disorders, mental health diagnoses, and other targeted outcomes. This study will offer unique information on the physiological and psychological stress pathways underlying change for specific subgroups of youth along with cost estimates to inform future implementation efforts in drop-in centers around the country.