Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05109702
Other study ID # HL036-DED-US-P302
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date November 18, 2021
Est. completion date May 6, 2022

Study information

Verified date October 2023
Source HanAll BioPharma Co., Ltd.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of tanfanercept ophthalmic solution 0.25% with placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 260
Est. completion date May 6, 2022
Est. primary completion date May 6, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Have a participant-reported history of dry eye for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1 - Have a history of use or desire to use eye drops for dry eye symptoms within 6 months of Visit 1 - Have a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.7 minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better (Snellen equivalent score of 20/100 or better) in each eye at Visit 1 - Report a score of = 2 according to the Ora Calibra® ocular discomfort & 4-symptom questionnaire in at least one of the dry eye symptoms at Visits 1 and 2 - Have a Schirmer's Test score of = 10 millimeter (mm) and = 1 mm in at least one eye at Visits 1 and 2 - Have a corneal fluorescein staining score = 2 according to the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of fluorescein staining in at least 1 of the corneal regions (inferior, superior, or central) in at least 1 eye at Visits 1 and 2 - Have a conjunctival redness score = 1 according to the Ora Calibra® conjunctival redness for dry eye scale in at least 1 eye at Visits 1 and 2 Exclusion Criteria: - Have any clinically significant slit lamp findings at Visit 1 that may include active blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, lid margin inflammation or active ocular allergies that require therapeutic treatment, and/or in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with study parameters - Be diagnosed with an ongoing ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal), or active ocular inflammation at Visit 1 - Have worn contact lenses within 7 days of Visit 1 or anticipate using contact lenses during the study - Have previously had laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery within the last 12 months - Have used any cyclosporine-containing drops (such as Restasis®, Cequa®), or lifitegrast ophthalmic solution (Xiidra®) within 60 days of Visit 1 - Have any previous experience using TNF inhibitor ophthalmic solutions, such Tanfanercept Ophthalmic Solution - Be currently taking any topical ophthalmic prescription (including medications for glaucoma) or over-the-counter (OTC) solutions, artificial tears, gels or scrubs, and cannot discontinue these medications for the duration of the trial (excluding medications allowed for the conduct of the study) - Be a woman who is pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
0.25% Tanfanercept Ophthalmic Solution
Tanfanercept ophthalmic solution.
Placebo
Placebo vehicle solution.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Scott & Christie and Associates, PC Cranberry Township Pennsylvania
United States Oculus Research, Inc. Garner North Carolina
United States Global Research Management Glendale California
United States Center For Sight Henderson Nevada
United States The Eye Care Institute - Butchertown Clinical Trials Louisville Kentucky
United States Eye Research Foundation, Inc. Newport Beach California
United States Cornea & Cataract Consultants of Arizona Phoenix Arizona
United States Andover Eye Associates: Raynham Raynham Massachusetts
United States Advancing Vision Research, LLC. Smyrna Tennessee
United States Andover Eye Associates: Warwick Warwick Rhode Island

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
HanAll BioPharma Co., Ltd. Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Staining Score (CCSS) at Day 57 CCSS was graded using the Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Fluorescein Staining Scale. The Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale ranged 0 = None, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe; lower score indicated improvement. Baseline, Day 57 (Week 8)
Primary Change From Baseline in Eye Dryness Score (EDS) Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale at Day 57 Eye dryness score was scored on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0%-100% (0=no discomfort; 100=maximal discomfort). Baseline, Day 57 (Week 8)
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fluorescein Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8: Central Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of fluorescein staining. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fluorescein Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8: Superior Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of fluorescein staining. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fluorescein Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8: Inferior Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of fluorescein staining. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fluorescein Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8: Temporal Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of fluorescein staining. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fluorescein Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8: Nasal Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of fluorescein staining. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fluorescein Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8: Corneal Sum The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of fluorescein staining. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicated improvement. Fluorescein total staining score for corneal regions was derived as the sum of the reported scores for the inferior, superior, and central regions. Total score ranged between 0 to 12, and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fluorescein Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8: Conjunctival Sum The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of fluorescein staining. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicated improvement. Fluorescein total staining score for conjunctival regions was derived the sum of the reported scores for the nasal and temporal regions. Total score ranged between 0 to 8, and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Fluorescein Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8: Total Staining The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of fluorescein staining. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicated improvement. Fluorescein total staining score for corneal and conjunctival regions was derived as the sum of the reported scores for the inferior, superior, central, temporal, and nasal regions. Total score ranged between 0 to 20, and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Central Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of lissamine green staining. The score ranges from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicates improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Superior Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of lissamine green staining. The score ranges from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicates improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Inferior Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of lissamine green staining. The score ranges from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicates improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Temporal Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of lissamine green staining. The score ranges from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicates improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Nasal Region The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of lissamine green staining. The score ranges from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicates improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Corneal Sum The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of lissamine green staining. The score ranges from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicates improvement. Lissamine Green total staining score for corneal regions was derived as the sum of the reported scores for the inferior, superior, and central regions. Total score ranged between 0 to 12,and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Conjunctival Sum The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of lissamine green staining. The score ranges from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicates improvement. Lissamine Green total staining score for conjunctival regions was derived as the sum of the reported scores for the nasal and temporal regions. Total score ranged between 0 to 8, and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Total Staining The score for individual region was assessed by the Ora Calibra® corneal and conjunctival staining scale for grading of lissamine green staining. The score ranges from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), and lower score indicates improvement. Lissamine Green total staining score for corneal and conjunctival regions was derived as the sum of the reported scores for the inferior, superior, central, nasal, and temporal regions. Total score ranged between 0 to 20, and lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Redness Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 It was evaluated by the Ora Calibra® conjunctival redness scale for dry eye. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), where lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Schirmer's Test Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 The Schirmer test strip was placed in the lower temporal lid margin of each eye. Participants were instructed to close their eyes and after 5 minutes had elapsed, the length of moistened area of schirmer strip was recorded (millimeter [mm]) for each eye. Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-up Time at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 Sodium fluorescein solution was instilled into each eye and participants were instructed to blinked several times. The time it took to form micelles from the time that the eye is opened was noted. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Burning/Stinging Participants rated ocular symptom of burning/stinging by placing a vertical mark on VAS that ranged from 0%-100% (0=no discomfort; 100=maximal discomfort). Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Foreign Body Sensation Participants rated ocular symptom of foreign body sensation by placing a vertical mark on VAS that ranged from 0%-100% (0=no discomfort; 100=maximal discomfort). Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Itching Participants rated ocular symptom of itching by placing a vertical mark on VAS that ranged from 0%-100% (0=no discomfort; 100=maximal discomfort). Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Blurred Vision Participants rated ocular symptom of blurred vision by placing a vertical mark on VAS that ranged from 0%-100% (0=no discomfort; 100=maximal discomfort). Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Eye Dryness Participants rated ocular symptom of eye dryness by placing a vertical mark on VAS that ranged from 0%-100% (0=no discomfort; 100=maximal discomfort). Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Photophobia Participants rated ocular symptom of photophobia by placing a vertical mark on VAS that ranged from 0%-100% (0=no discomfort; 100=maximal discomfort). Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Pain Participants rated ocular symptom of pain by placing a vertical mark on VAS that ranged from 0%-100% (0=no discomfort; 100=maximal discomfort). Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 OSDI was a simple 12-question survey that rated the severity of the participant's dry eye disease based on the symptoms. Each question response ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 = None of the Time, 1 = Some of the Time, 2 = Half of the Time, 3 = Most of the Time, and 4 = All of the Time. Total OSDI score = (Sum of all answered questions) * 25/ (number of questions answered); which ranged from 0 to 100, with higher score representing greater disability. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Scale at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 It was assessed by the Ora Calibra® ocular discomfort scale. The score ranged from 0 to 4 (0=none and 4=severe), where lower score indicated improvement. Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Burning Discomfort Ora Calibra® ocular discomfort & 4-symptom questionnaire for dry eye included rating of the severity of 5 symptoms: ocular discomfort, burning, dryness, grittiness, and stinging.
Participants rated the severity of burning at all scheduled visits on 0 to 5 scale, where 0=none and 5=severe. Higher score represent higher severity.
Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Dryness Discomfort Ora Calibra® ocular discomfort & 4-symptom questionnaire for dry eye included rating of the severity of 5 symptoms: ocular discomfort, burning, dryness, grittiness, and stinging.
Participants rated the severity of dryness at all scheduled visits on 0 to 5 scale, where 0=none and 5=severe. Higher score represent higher severity.
Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Grittiness Discomfort Ora Calibra® ocular discomfort & 4-symptom questionnaire for dry eye included rating of the severity of 5 symptoms: ocular discomfort, burning, dryness, grittiness, and stinging.
Participants rated the severity of grittiness at all scheduled visits on 0 to 5 scale, where 0=none and 5=severe. Higher score represent higher severity.
Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Change From Baseline in Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 : Stinging Discomfort Ora Calibra® ocular discomfort & 4-symptom questionnaire for dry eye included rating of the severity of 5 symptoms: ocular discomfort, burning, dryness, grittiness, and stinging.
Participants rated the severity of stinging at all scheduled visits on 0 to 5 scale, where 0=none and 5=severe. Higher score represent higher severity.
Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Ora Calibra® Drop Comfort Assessment at Week 1 Ora Calibra® drop comfort scale ranged from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicated comfortable and 10 indicated uncomfortable. Lower score indicated better comfort level. Immediately Upon Instillation, 1 Minute Post Instillation and 2 Minutes Post Instillation at Week 1 Week 1
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05102409 - An Exploratory Clinical Trial to Assess Safety and Tolerability in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease Phase 2
Completed NCT05027087 - The Effect of a Novel Blueberry Supplement on Dry Eye Disease Phase 3
Completed NCT06159569 - Performance and Tolerability of the Medical Device LACRIACT N/A
Completed NCT04081610 - Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Lagricel® Ofteno Multi-dose Ophthalmic Solution Phase 1
Completed NCT05062564 - Efficacy of LipiFlow in Patients Affected by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Reducing Post-cataract Surgery Dry Eye N/A
Completed NCT05825599 - PMCF Study to Evaluate Performance and Safety of "HPMC-based Eyedrops" Used to Relieve Dry Eye Symptoms N/A
Completed NCT03418727 - Dry Eye Disease Study With Brimonidine Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04425551 - Effect of Micropulse Laser on Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction N/A
Recruiting NCT04527887 - Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert for the Treatment of Inflammation and Discomfort in Dry Eye Disease (DEcIDED) Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT06379685 - Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of PRO-190 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Systane Ultra® on the Ocular Surface. Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT05618730 - Safety, Tolerability, Plug Retention and Preliminary Efficacy of Tacrolimus-loaded Punctal Plug in Patients With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease - Cohort B Phase 1
Completed NCT04553432 - Dry Eye OmniLenz Application of Omnigen Research Study Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04109170 - Dry Eye Evaluation System Based on Bioinformatics
Completed NCT04105842 - Refitting Daily Disposable Contact Lens Wearers With Dry Eye Disease With A Different Daily Disposable Lens Type N/A
Completed NCT05505292 - Lifitegrast 5% for the Treatment of Dry Eye In Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers Phase 4
Completed NCT04668131 - Study on Curative Effect and Mechanism of Acupuncture on Neuropathic Pain in Dry Eye Disease N/A
Completed NCT06176651 - Evaluation of Miebo (Perfluorohexyloctane) Eyedrops in Habitual Contact Lens Wearers Phase 4
Completed NCT02235259 - Efficacy and Safety of XG-104 for the Treatment of Dry Eye Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT02218827 - Topical Steroid Treatment For Dry Eye N/A
Completed NCT01959854 - Efficacy of Topical 0.2% Xanthan Gum in Patients With Dry Eye N/A