Dry Eye Syndromes Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase I/II Prospective, Randomized, Double Masked, Vehicle And Comparator Controlled, Dose Ranging Study Of CP-690,550 In Subjects With Dry Eye Disease.
Verified date | February 2013 |
Source | Pfizer |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
A prospective, randomized, placebo and active comparator controlled study of CP-690,550 in subjects with dry eye.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 327 |
Est. completion date | October 2009 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2009 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Symptoms of dry eye for at least 6 months. - Signs of moderate to severe dry eye Exclusion Criteria: - Women who are nursing or pregnant - Participation in other studies within 30 days of screening visit - Ocular disorders that may confound interpretation of study results |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Artesia | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Austin | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Austin | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Austin | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Centennial | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Chandler | Arizona |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | High Point | North Carolina |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Kansas City | Missouri |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Lynbrook | New York |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Morrow | Georgia |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Ormond Beach | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Peoria | Arizona |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Rochester | New York |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Roswell | Georgia |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Stuart | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Tamarac | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Tampa | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pfizer |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants With Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Systemic AEs are the events which are not localized but occur throughout the systemic circulation. | Baseline up to Week 8 | Yes |
Primary | Percentage of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Ocular AEs are the events which are localized in the ocular region. | Baseline up to Week 8 | Yes |
Primary | Percentage of Participants With Ocular Tolerability Assessment | Ocular tolerability assessment included evaluation of severity and duration of the 5 symptoms: burning/stinging, blurred vision, ocular discomfort, pain, tearing. Severity was assessed on a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe. Duration was assessed as immediate (if subsided within 5 minutes [<5 min] after application) or persistent (if continued beyond 5 minutes [>=5 min] after application). | Baseline up to Week 8 | Yes |
Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 Millimeter (mm) Schirmer Wetting Score Without Anesthesia at Week 8 | Schirmer test without anesthesia: well standardized test used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 millimeter (mm). If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Time to Achieve >= 10mm Schirmer Test Score Without Anesthesia | Schirmer test without anesthesia: well standardized test used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Baseline through Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Time to Achieve 100 Percent (%) Clearance of Corneal Staining | Corneal staining was assessed by instilling sodium fluorescein dye in the eye and after 1 to 2 minutes, observing for corneal staining with the aid of a yellow filter and slit lamp. The cornea was divided into five different zones and each corneal zone was graded independently using a 0 to 3 grading scale; where 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Results from study eye were to be reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Baseline through Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Time to Achieve >= 5 Units Decrease in Ocular Comfort Index (OCI) Score | OCI: validated questionnaire to measure the frequency and intensity of 6 common dry eye symptoms: dryness, grittiness, stinging, eye tiredness, pain, and itching. It contained 12 questions, each measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (always/severe). Total score was transformed to range of 0 to 100, higher score indicated more ocular discomfort. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. | Baseline through Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Schirmer Wetting Score Without Anesthesia at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 | Schirmer test without anesthesia: well standardized test used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Schirmer Wetting Score With Anesthesia at Week 8 | Schirmer test was performed 2 to 3 minutes after 1 drop of proparacaine 0.5% was placed in lower conjunctival fornix and superior bulbar conjunctiva of each eye. It was used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Baseline, Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=10 mm Schirmer Wetting Score Without Anesthesia at Week 1, 2, 4 and 6 | Schirmer test without anesthesia: well standardized test used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Week 1, 2, 4, 6 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=10 mm Schirmer Wetting Score With Anesthesia at Week 8 | Schirmer test was performed 2 to 3 minutes after 1 drop of proparacaine 0.5% was placed in lower conjunctival fornix and superior bulbar conjunctiva of each eye. It was used to estimate tear flow stimulated reflexly by insertion of a filter paper strip into the conjunctival sac for 5 min. The length of wetting was recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. If the wetting line was oblique, halfway point was used. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Week 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining Scores at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 | Corneal staining was assessed using fluorescein dye, a yellow filter, and a slit lamp. The cornea was divided into 5 different zones. Each corneal zone was graded independently using a 0 to 3 grading scale; where 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Sum of scores of each zone led to total score. Total score range: 0 to 15, higher score indicated greater staining. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated 100% Clearance of Corneal Staining | Corneal staining was assessed using fluorescein dye, yellow filter, slit lamp. Cornea was divided into 5 different zones. Each corneal zone was graded independently using 0 to 3 grading scale:0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Sum of scores of each zone led to total score. Total score range: 0 to 15, higher score indicated greater staining. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Interpalpebral Conjunctival Staining Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 | Interpalpebral conjunctival staining was performed 1 minute following ocular administration of lissamine green dye with aid of slit lamp. Based on Oxford grading system, bulbar conjunctiva was divided into 2 zones: nasal, temporal. Staining were graded using a 6-point scale (0=absent, 5=severe). Total score=sum of 2 zone scores. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score=higher damage to eyes due to dryness. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Tear Break-up Time (TBUT) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 | TBUT was the time interval between the last complete blink and the first appearance of a dry spot, or disruption in the tear film. It was measured under a slit lamp following instillation of fluorescein dye in the eye using a stopwatch. Results from study eye are reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse Schirmer test score without anesthesia score at baseline. | Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Ocular Comfort Index (OCI) Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 | OCI: validated questionnaire to measure the frequency and intensity of 6 common dry eye symptoms: dryness, grittiness, stinging, eye tiredness, pain, and itching. It contains 12 questions, each measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (always/severe). Total score was transformed to range of 0 to 100, higher score indicated more ocular discomfort. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. | Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With >= 5 Units Decrease in Total OCI Score | OCI: validated questionnaire to measure the frequency and intensity of 6 common dry eye symptoms: dryness, grittiness, stinging, eye tiredness, pain, and itching. It contains 12 questions, each measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (always/severe). Total score was transformed to range of 0 to 100, higher score indicated more ocular discomfort. | Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Daily Artificial Tear Use at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 | Daily artificial tear use was assessed by collecting data on daily number of drops of artificial tear instilled in the eye using a participant diary. Decrease in daily artificial tear use indicated improvement. | Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total and Subscale Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 | OSDI is a validated instrument for ocular surface disease. It has 12 items, each measured on 5-point Likert scale (0=none of the time, 4=all the time). Based on these item scores, a total OSDI score (question 1 [Q1]-Q12) and three subscale scores can be derived: Ocular Symptom (Q1-Q3), Vision-related function (Q4-Q9), and Environmental trigger (Q10-Q12). Each derived score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicates worse condition. | Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With >= 10 Units Decrease in Total OSDI Score | OSDI is a validated instrument for ocular surface disease. It has 12 items, each has a raw score measured on 5-point Likert scale (0=none of the time, 4=all the time). Based on these item scores, a total OSDI score can be derived which ranges from 0 to 100; a higher score indicates worse ocular disease. | Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Raw Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 | OSDI is a validated instrument for ocular surface disease. It has 12 items, each with a raw score measured on 5-point Likert scale (0=none of the time, 4=all the time). | Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Modified Ocular Comfort Index (mOCI) Raw Scores at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 | mOCI consisted of the original 12-item OCI plus additional questions on other dry eye symptoms and their impact to participant's life. Each item was measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (always/severe). Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. | Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25-item Score (NEI-VFQ-25) at Week 8 | NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire included 25 items based on which overall composite VFQ score and 12 subscales were derived: general health (GH), general vision (GV), ocular pain (OP), near activities (NAct), distance activities (DA), social functioning (SF), mental health (MH), role difficulties (RD), dependency, driving, color vision (CV) and peripheral vision (PV). Response to each question converted to 0-100 score. Each subscale, total score=average of items contributing to score. For each subscale and total score, score range: 0 to 100, higher score=less symptoms/better visual functioning. | Baseline, Week 8 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04425551 -
Effect of Micropulse Laser on Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06379685 -
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of PRO-190 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Systane Ultra® on the Ocular Surface.
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04701086 -
3 Month Study of Cationorm Pro Versus Vismed in Adults With Dry Eye Disease Related to Keratitis or Keratoconjunctivitis
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03697876 -
Safety and Tolerability of the Ophthalmic Gel PRO-165 Versus Artelac® Nightime Gel
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT02815293 -
Topical Ophthalmic AGN-195263 for the Treatment of Evaporative Dry Eye
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02910713 -
Evaluation of Dry Eye Symptoms in CAE With Application of Intranasal Neurostimulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04104997 -
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of GLH8NDE After Single and Mutiple Ocular Administrations in Healthy Korean and Caucasian Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02595606 -
0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Dry Eye of Diabetic Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01711424 -
An Observational Study of OPTIVE PLUS® for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01202747 -
Evaluation of Screening Methods for Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01015209 -
Safety and Tolerability of Chitosan-N-acetylcysteine Eye Drops in Healthy Young Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00969280 -
Acupuncture for Dry Eye Syndrome
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00739713 -
Effects of Sea Buckthorn Oil on Dry Eye
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01496482 -
Comparison of Evaporimetry With the Established Methods of Tear Film Measurement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00756678 -
Efficacy and Acceptability of Two Lubricant Eye Drops
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00370747 -
Efficacy and Safety Study for Ecabet Ophthalmic Solution for Treating Dry Eye Syndrome
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00349440 -
Efficacy of Cyclosporine for the Prevention and Treatment of Dry Eye Symptoms Following LASIK or Photorefractive Keratectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05162261 -
to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® , VS LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02871440 -
A Two Comparator, Controlled Phase 3 Study in Patients With and Without Evaporative Dry Eye
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05042960 -
Computer Screen Properties Study
|
N/A |