View clinical trials related to Dry Eye Disease.
Filter by:This study employed secondary database analysis of the Adelphi Dry Eye Disease (DED) Disease Specific Programme™ (DSP™), a templatized cross-sectional survey with retrospective data collection that is administered by Adelphi to a convenience sample of patients diagnosed with DED, and their consulting physicians in the United States. In addition to the survey data, the DED DSP also included recorded medical history data as reported by physicians (optometrists, ophthalmologists or refractive surgeons).
This randomized clinical trial (RCT) was aimed to determine the effects of eye masking on sleep quality and tear layer function in patients with dry eye disease. In this regard, a total of 34 patients with dry eye disease aged between 20 to 35 years old will be participated. They will be randomly divided into case and control (n=17) groups. Patients in the case group will be instructed to wear the eye mask as long as two weeks and the controls will be recommended to not wear it at the same time. Afterwards, the eye mask application will be cross- over for the next 2 hours between the two groups. Tear layer will be investigated in baseline and repeated in both follow- ups of weeks 2 and 4, either quantitatively and qualitatively, by using Schirmer and TBUT tests. Furthermore, the sleep quality will be checked by the PSQI test.
The objective is to compare the USL and placebo in terms of efficacy and safety, and to determine the appropriate dosage.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical spironolactone ophthalmic solution, 0.005 mg/cc in subjects with dry eye disease compared to placebo. The hypothesis for this study is that topical spironolactone ophthalmic solution will be beneficial in the management of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease when compared to placebo.
Patients who suffer from dry eye disease are often prescribed eye drops containing cyclosporine A that help with reducing inflammation. The newest eye drop containing cyclosporine A is called Cequa (Sun Pharma, Canada). Unfortunately, nearly a quarter of (24.2%) of patients using Cequa have reported some form of discomfort (burning and stinging) when instilling the drops. This potentially discourages patients from continuing the eye drop, which prevents their dry eye disease from being managed effectively. This study is trying to determine if refrigerating the eye drops would allow the drops to feel more comfortable when they are instilled in the eye.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about licaminlimab (OCS-02) in the treatment of dry eye disease. The main question it aims to answer is if licaminlimab ophthalmic suspension is more effective than vehicle in treating signs of dry eye disease.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate investigational ocular lubricants for their safety and tolerability on subjects with mild to moderate dry eye disease.
The goal of this interventional investigation is to compare BUFY02 with TRB02 in the treatment of patients with dry eye disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is BUFY02 non-inferior to TRB02 in terms of signs of DED? - Is BUFY02 non-inferior to TRB02 in terms of symptoms of DED? Participants will be asked to: - Visit the trial site at 4 different timepoints - Use the allocated study treatment everyday until the end of the study (during 3 months) - Be examined by the investigator - Complete several questionnaires - Return unused study treatment. Researchers will compare BUFY02 to TRB02 to see if both study treatments provide similar effects on signs and symptoms of the disease, together with comparable safety.
The goal of this interventional investigation is to compare BUFY01 with SVS20 in the treatment of patients with dry eye disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is BUFY01 non-inferior to SVS20 in terms of signs of DED? - Is BUFY01 non-inferior to SVS20 in terms of symptoms of DED? Participants will be asked to: - Visit the trial site at 4 different timepoints - Use the allocated study treatment everyday until the end of the study (during 3 months) - Be examined by the investigator - Complete several questionnaires - Return unused study treatment. Researchers will compare BUFY01 to SVS20 to see if both study treatments provide similar effects on signs and symptoms of the disease, together with comparable safety.
A prospective, non- interventional, observational, non-comparative, longitudinal cohort study design will be used to address the objectives of this study using data collected through a healthcare.