Dream Content Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Impact of Epilepsy Surgery on Dream Content
NCT number | NCT02731443 |
Other study ID # | 107654 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 2016 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2018 |
Verified date | February 2020 |
Source | London Health Sciences Centre |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
Prospective observational study on epilepsy patients undergoing partial brain resection surgery (i.e. anterior temporal lobectomy) to assess the change in dream content before and 3 months and 1 year after surgery using anonymized dream-recall questionnaires. A control group of epilepsy patients undergoing diagnostic depth electrodes placement will complete the same questionnaires pre- and postoperatively to asses the factor 'general anesthesia' as a potential confounder.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | June 30, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 16 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - All epilepsy patients (minimum age: 16 years) undergoing elective surgical resection of brain tissue (study group) or depth electrode insertion in general anesthesia (control group) that give written consent after thorough study information. - Patients must be able to understand the study concept and willing/able to document their most recent dream in written. Exclusion Criteria: - Inability to document their most recent dream in written (language barrier, illiteracy, low intelligence, mental disabilities). Age <16 years. - Relevant co-morbidities such as dementia, depression and other psychiatric disorders, Parkinson's disease. - Previous cranial surgery in a relevant cortical area of the default dream network. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | London Health Sciences Center, University Hospital | London | Ontario |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
London Health Sciences Centre |
Canada,
Bentes C, Costa J, Peralta R, Pires J, Sousa P, Paiva T. Dream recall frequency and content in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011 Nov;52(11):2022-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03290.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17. — View Citation
Domhoff GW, Fox KC. Dreaming and the default network: A review, synthesis, and counterintuitive research proposal. Conscious Cogn. 2015 May;33:342-53. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Feb 24. Review. — View Citation
Domhoff GW, Schneider A. New rationales and methods for quantitative dream research outside the laboratory. Sleep. 1998 Jun 15;21(4):398-404. — View Citation
International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/. Accessed 1st of August 2015.
Schneider A, Domhoff GW. The Quantitative Study of Dreams. Retrieved December 13 2015: http://www.dreamresearch.net/.
Solms M. Dreaming and REM sleep are controlled by different brain mechanisms. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Dec;23(6):843-50; discussion 904-1121. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Seizure frequency (ESx only) | According to the ENGEL classification | 3 and 12 months | |
Other | Anti epileptic drugs (AED) usage (ESx only) | Number of different AED | 3 and 12 months | |
Primary | Percentage Change of Dream Features Occurrence (i.e. dream content; MOST RECENT DREAM questionnaire) - both groups (ESx & control group) | Percentage change of the following dream features occurrences according to the Hall/Van de Castle system are considered: Characters Social Interactions Aggression Friendliness Sexuality Activities (walking, talking, seeing, thinking, etc.) Success and Failure Misfortune and Good Fortune Emotions Settings Objects Descriptive Elements (modifiers, time, negatives) The relative abundance of the dream content listed above will be expressed in percentage and postoperative changes compared to the preoperative baseline. Relative differences between the indicators will be determined and statistically tested for significance. The one indicator that turns out to be statistically different from the rest will be considered the primary outcome measure. For an example, compare Bentes et al. 2011. |
3 months | |
Secondary | Dream Content (MOST RECENT DREAM questionnaire) - ESx group | Major indicators for main content categories according to the Hall/Van de Castle system. | 12 months |