Diverticulitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a 12 Week Treatment of Acute Diverticulitis With Asacol® 2.4 g/Day (400 mg Mesalamine Tablet), Followed by a 9 Month Treatment-free Observation Period
Verified date | April 2013 |
Source | Warner Chilcott |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Asacol® 2.4 g/day (400 mg Mesalamine) is safe and effective in the treatment of diverticulitis.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 117 |
Est. completion date | March 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 35 Years to 85 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - A clinical diagnosis of acute diverticulitis - Female patients must be postmenopausal (at least 1 year without spontaneous menses) or surgically sterile or have a negative urine pregnancy test and practice acceptable contraception (e.g., abstinence; oral, intramuscular, or implanted hormonal contraception [at least 3 months prior to enrollment]; 2-barrier methods [e.g., condom, diaphragm, or spermicide]; intrauterine device or verbal report of partner with history of non-reversed vasectomy) - Willing and able to participate in the study and provide a signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Presence of diverticular complications (e.g., fistula, abscess, obstruction, stenosis); - Active or recent history (within 6 months) of a peptic ulcer; - Prior history of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), as determined by the Investigator; - History of major abdominal surgery (as determined by the Investigator); - History of GI surgery within 3 months of diagnosis of acute diverticulitis; - History of immunocompromising disease, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS); - If female patient, active or recent history of endometriosis or dysmenorrhea; - Received a dose of a product that contains, or is metabolized to, mesalamine by any route within 4 weeks before the screening visit; |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Research Site | Asheville | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Boynton Beach | Florida |
United States | Research Facility | Cedar Knolls | New Jersey |
United States | Research Site | Chesapeake | Virginia |
United States | Research Site | Chesterfield | Michigan |
United States | Research Site | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Research Site | Cranston | Rhode Island |
United States | Research Site | Great Neck | New York |
United States | Research Site | Greenville | North Carolina |
United States | Research Facility | Harrisburg | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Jacksonsville | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Lafayette | Colorado |
United States | Research Site | Lake Success | New York |
United States | Research Site | Littleton | Colorado |
United States | Research Site | Longview | Texas |
United States | Research Facility | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Research Site | Merced | California |
United States | Research Site | Mexico | Missouri |
United States | Research Facility | Monroe | Wisconsin |
United States | Research Site | Monroe | Louisiana |
United States | Research Site | Morganton | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Oakland | California |
United States | Research Site | Odessa | Texas |
United States | Research Facility | Orange | California |
United States | Research Site | Palm Springs | California |
United States | Research Site | Pasadena | California |
United States | Research Site | Pratt | Kansas |
United States | Research Site | Setauket | New York |
United States | Research Site | Shreveport | Louisiana |
United States | Research Site | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Research Site | Tupelo | Mississippi |
United States | Research Site | Wilmington | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Winter Park | Florida |
United States | Research Facility | Zephyrhills | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Warner Chilcott |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Global Symptom Score (GSS) at Week 12, Primary Efficacy Population | GSS - Abdominal Pain & Symptom Rating, scale 0-none (better) to 6-severe (worse) for each of the following categories: abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, nausea/vomiting, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, mucus in stool, feeling urge to evacuate but no bowel movement, painful straining with bowel movement, pain/difficulty urinating. Total minimum score 0 (better), total maximum score 60 (worse). | 12 Weeks | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Responders at Week 12 - ITT Population | Responder - patient whose GSS scores for all symptoms were either 0 or 1 GSS - Abdominal Pain & Symptom Rating, scale 0-none (better) to 6-severe (worse) for each of the following categories: abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, nausea/vomiting, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, mucus in stool, feeling urge to evacuate but no bowel movement, painful straining with bowel movement, pain/difficulty urinating. Total minimum score 0 (better), total maximum score 60 (worse). | 12 Weeks | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Responders at Week 52 - ITT Population | Responder - patient whose GSS scores for all symptoms were either 0 or 1 GSS - Abdominal Pain & Symptom Rating, scale 0-none (better) to 6-severe (worse) for each of the following categories: abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, nausea/vomiting, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, mucus in stool, feeling urge to evacuate but no bowel movement, painful straining with bowel movement, pain/difficulty urinating. Total minimum score 0 (better), total maximum score 60 (worse). | 52 Weeks | No |
Secondary | Change in GSS From Baseline to Week 12 - ITT Population | GSS - Abdominal Pain & Symptom Rating, scale 0-none (better) to 6-severe (worse) for each of the following categories: abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, nausea/vomiting, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, mucus in stool, feeling urge to evacuate but no bowel movement, painful straining with bowel movement, pain/difficulty urinating. Total minimum score 0 (better), total maximum score 60 (worse). | Baseline to Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Change in GSS From Baseline to Week 52 - ITT Population | GSS - Abdominal Pain & Symptom Rating, scale 0-none (better) to 6-severe (worse) for each of the following categories: abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, nausea/vomiting, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, mucus in stool, feeling urge to evacuate but no bowel movement, painful straining with bowel movement, pain/difficulty urinating. Total minimum score 0 (better), total maximum score 60 (worse). | Baseline to Week 52 | No |
Secondary | Withdrawal Due to Surgery for Diverticulitis, Percentage, ITT Population, Week 12 | 12 Weeks | No | |
Secondary | Recurrent Diverticulitis, Percentage, ITT Population, Week 12 | At least one report of recurrent diverticulitis since the last visit (prior to the Week 12 visit). | 12 Weeks | No |
Secondary | Recurrent Diverticulitis, Percentage, ITT Population, Week 52 | At least one report of recurrent diverticulitis since the last visit (prior to the Week 52 visit). | 52 Weeks | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03042091 -
Neomycin and Metronidazole Hydrochloride With or Without Polyethylene Glycol in Reducing Infection in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02246361 -
Impact of Six Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) on Doctor Patient Communication
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01476995 -
Prognostic Indicators as Provided by the EPIC ClearView
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01081054 -
Hospitalization or Ambulatory Treatment of Acute Diverticulitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00195351 -
Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03337984 -
Damage Control Surgery in the Treatment of Complicated Diverticulitis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06210724 -
FIT in Diverticulitis
|
||
Completed |
NCT01986686 -
Recurrence Following Nonoperative Management of 1st Episode of Hinchey II Diverticulitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01477190 -
Spinal Analgesia for Colonic Resection Using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01056913 -
NITI CAR27 (ColonRing) Compression Anastomosis in Colorectal Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00230971 -
Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00468455 -
Post-Op Quality of Life After Colorectal Surgery
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03700593 -
Feasibility and Safety of Single Port Robot in Colorectal Procedures
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04095663 -
Comparison of Surgery and Medicine on the Impact of Diverticulitis (COSMID) Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00545740 -
Prevention of Recurrence of Diverticulitis
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01837342 -
Multicenter Study Comparing Morbidity and Quality of Life Associated in the Treatment by Surgical Resection and the Conservative Treatment, After Favorable Evolution of Purulent Peritonitis That Originates From Diverticulitis Treated by Mini-invasive Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01727388 -
Informativeness to Digital Rectal Examination
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04173182 -
Confocal Laser Endomicrospy in Colonic Diverticular Disease
|
||
Completed |
NCT01560377 -
Perfusion Assessment in Laparoscopic Left Anterior Resection
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02200055 -
Using Electrical Bioimpedance Assessments to Estimate Perioperative Total Body Water and Postoperative Fluid Need
|
N/A |