Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02356406
Other study ID # SHEBA-14-1630-DH-CTIL
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 2
First received January 21, 2015
Last updated February 5, 2015
Start date January 2014
Est. completion date June 2016

Study information

Verified date February 2015
Source Sheba Medical Center
Contact David Hausner, M.D
Phone 972-35302542
Email david.hausner@sheba.health.gov.il
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Israel: Ministry of Health
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This prospective study evaluates celiac plexus radiosurgery for pain control in patients with upper abdominal malignancies.


Description:

This study aims as primary objective to evaluate short and long term pain relief following the administration of radiosurgery to the celiac plexus in patients with upper abdominal cancer. As secondary objectives it will describe acute and late side effects and quality of life measures of patients undergoing the treatment.

The study has a prospective, single arm design. It will be composed from an initial run-in safety assessment that will include 6 patients and then continue as a phase II trial. All eligible patients will receive the same protocol of celiac plexus radiosurgery and will be evaluated before, during and following this treatment.

The treatment duration is one and a half weeks (5 fractions delivered every other weekday).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date June 2016
Est. primary completion date January 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with upper abdominal cancer (pancreatic/gastric/colon/hepato-biliary cancer) with typical retroperitoneal pain syndrome (somatic pain that radiates from the upper abdomen to the back) thought to be secondary to celiac plexus involvement, directly or indirectly, and have high level of pain despite opioids usage (NRS >4). Patients with other cancer types metastatic to the celiac lymph nodes will also be eligible

- Recent abdominal imaging (CT, PET or MRI) should be at most 2 months old.

- Prior chemotherapy or biological treatment is allowed, but any active oncological treatment should be stopped at least 1 week prior to radiation and renewed at least 1 week following radiation. Following gemcitabine 2 weeks are required between final dose and commencement of radiation

- Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients under 18 years of age

- Patients who are well balanced in terms of pain control

- Patients with life expectancy <8 weeks

- Patients with ECOG (Eastern cooperative oncology group) performance status 4

- Any concurrent chemotherapy or biologic treatment is prohibited during 1 week before until 1 week following radiotherapy

- Special populations: pregnant women, prisoners, patients with major psychiatric illnesses

- Previous radiotherapy to upper abdomen

- Conditions associated with increased side effects to radiotherapy (IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) for example)

Study Design

Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Supportive Care


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Radiation:
Celiac Plexus Radiosurgery
5 fractions of SBRT (Stereotactic body radiation therapy). The target will always include the anterior-medial aspect aorta at T12-L2 (surrogate for celiac plexus). If there is adjacent tumor (e.g. pancreatic tumor that infiltrates the celiac plexus) this will be irradiated in addition. It is expected that patients will be treated with a rapid-arc IMRT (Intensity modulation radiation therapy) dose-painting technique. Details of beam arrangement and energy used will be determined on an individual basis.

Locations

Country Name City State
Israel Sheba Medical Center Ramat-Gan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Sheba Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Israel, 

References & Publications (12)

Chuong MD, Springett GM, Freilich JM, Park CK, Weber JM, Mellon EA, Hodul PJ, Malafa MP, Meredith KL, Hoffe SE, Shridhar R. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is effective and well tolerated. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jul 1;86(3):516-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.022. Epub 2013 Apr 5. — View Citation

Didolkar MS, Coleman CW, Brenner MJ, Chu KU, Olexa N, Stanwyck E, Yu A, Neerchal N, Rabinowitz S. Image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma results of first 85 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Oct;14(10):1547-59. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1323-7. Epub 2010 Sep 14. — View Citation

Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. Epub 2007 Dec 11. — View Citation

Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-58. — View Citation

Iwata K, Yasuda I, Enya M, Mukai T, Nakashima M, Doi S, Iwashita T, Tomita E, Moriwaki H. Predictive factors for pain relief after endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Dig Endosc. 2011 Apr;23(2):140-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01046.x. Epub 2010 Dec 7. — View Citation

Kambadakone A, Thabet A, Gervais DA, Mueller PR, Arellano RS. CT-guided celiac plexus neurolysis: a review of anatomy, indications, technique, and tips for successful treatment. Radiographics. 2011 Oct;31(6):1599-621. doi: 10.1148/rg.316115526. Review. — View Citation

Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac plexus block. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jun;57(7):923-30. Review. — View Citation

Macchia G, Morganti AG, Cilla S, Ippolito E, Massaccesi M, Picardi V, Mattiucci GC, Bonomo P, Tambaro R, Pacelli F, Piermattei A, De Spirito M, Valentini V, Cellini N, Deodato F. Quality of life and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in pancreatic tumors: a case series. Cancer Invest. 2012 Feb;30(2):149-55. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2011.640649. — View Citation

Rwigema JC, Parikh SD, Heron DE, Howell M, Zeh H, Moser AJ, Bahary N, Quinn A, Burton SA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb;34(1):63-9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181d270b4. — View Citation

Smigielski J, Piskorz L, Wawrzycki M, Kutwin L, Misiak P, Brocki M. Assessment of quality of life in patients with non-operated pancreatic cancer after videothoracoscopic splanchnicectomy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2011 Sep;6(3):132-7. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.24690. Epub 2011 Sep 30. — View Citation

Wong GY, Schroeder DR, Carns PE, Wilson JL, Martin DP, Kinney MO, Mantilla CB, Warner DO. Effect of neurolytic celiac plexus block on pain relief, quality of life, and survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Mar 3;291(9):1092-9. — View Citation

Zhu Z, Friess H, diMola FF, Zimmermann A, Graber HU, Korc M, Büchler MW. Nerve growth factor expression correlates with perineural invasion and pain in human pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Aug;17(8):2419-28. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score difference from baseline 3 weeks post treatment No
Secondary Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score difference from baseline 6 weeks and 3 months post treatment and subsequently every 3 months on average up to 1 year post treatment No
Secondary Analgesic use difference from baseline in oral morphin equivalents Average analgesic consumption will be defined using daily oral morphine equivalents in milligrams 6 weeks and 3 months post treatment and subsequently every 3 months on average up to 1 year post treatment No
Secondary QoL difference from baseline 6 weeks and 3 months post treatment and subsequently every 3 months on average up to 1 year post treatment No
Secondary Safety profile of the procedure - measuring the frequency and severity of treatment side effects, mainly GI toxicities The safety profile will focused on fatigue and expected GI (gastro-intestinal) toxicities as nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Acute and late toxicity will be assessed using the NCI-CTCAE (common toxicity criteria for adverse events) version 4.0 6 weeks and 3 months post treatment and subsequently every 3 months on average up to 1 year post treatment Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06026774 - Clinical Study of Personalized mRNA Vaccine Encoding Neoantigen in Subjects With Resected Digestive System Neoplasms Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06026800 - Clinical Study of Personalized mRNA Vaccine Encoding Neoantigen in Combination With Standard First-line Treatment in Subjects With Advanced Digestive System Neoplasms Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06019702 - Clinical Study of Personalized mRNA Vaccine Encoding Neoantigen Alone in Subjects With Advanced Digestive System Neoplasms Phase 1
Completed NCT02909452 - Continuation Study of Entinostat in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT05602935 - Efficacy and Safety of SOX Regimen Combined With Camrelizumab as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Phase II, Single-arm Study Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04518852 - TACE, Sorafenib and PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody in the Treatment of HCC Phase 2
Completed NCT03717298 - Evaluation of Ocoxin-Viusid® in Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05322486 - Palliative Primary Tumor Resection in Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Unresectable Metastases
Recruiting NCT04556344 - Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention Aimed at Increasing the Emotional Competencies of Patients Under Surveillance After Antineoplastic Treatment of Oesogastric or Bronchopulmonary Cancer N/A
Terminated NCT03306693 - Educational Intervention to Increase the Emotional Competence of Patients With Oesogastric and Bronchopulmonary Cancers N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01037049 - Optimum Timing for Surgery After Pre-operative Radiotherapy 6 vs 12 Weeks Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02208804 - Surefire Infusion System vs. Standard Microcatheter Use During Holmium-166 Radioembolization Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04080843 - Anlotinib Hydrochloride Capsules Combined With CAPEOX in RAS and BRAF Wild-type mCRC Patients Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03303495 - A Study of 2nd-line FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab vs. Irinotecan ± Bevacizumab in mCRC Phase 3
Terminated NCT04644315 - A Home-Based Approach Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alectinib in Locally-Advanced or Metastatic ALK-Positive Solid Tumors Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03271255 - Apatinib Versus Bevacizumab in Second-line Therapy for Colorectal Cancer(ABST-C) Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03221335 - EUS-guided RFA for Solid Abdominal Neoplasms N/A
Recruiting NCT02487017 - DC-CIK Combined With TACE in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT01556815 - Sorafenib Combined With Transarterial Chemoembolization in Treating HBV-infected Patients With Intermediate Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04949282 - Spanish Series of Patients Treated With the Radionuclide Lutetium177