Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03134560
Other study ID # IndonesiaUAnes003
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received April 24, 2017
Last updated October 26, 2017
Start date April 2016
Est. completion date May 2016

Study information

Verified date October 2017
Source Indonesia University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to compare intravenous cannulation success rate between using vein display instrument and without using vein display instrument in pediatric patients.


Description:

Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Parents' subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study. After doing asepsis and antisepsis procedure and putting on the tourniquet the first group would get intravenous cannulation without vein displaying instrument. While for the second group, after doing asepsis procedure and tourniquet was put on, a vein display instrument was used to choose the vein. Intravenous cannulation was done after antiseptic procedure. After blood dripped out of the cannula, cannula was connected to the infusion set. Evaluation was done to assess vein route establishment, canulation attempt number and swelling. Data recorded were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) using Chi-square test or Fisher Exact test. Significant value is p<0.05.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 88
Est. completion date May 2016
Est. primary completion date May 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A to 5 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Subjects aged 0-5 years old

- Subjects with difficult vein access (e.g. edema, obesity, chemotherapy history),

- Subjects whose parents had signed the informed consent

- Subjects with available vein access locations at the back of either hands.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Subjects who had infection signs at the designated vein access location

- Subjects in need of emergency procedures.

Drop out Criteria:

- Subjects resigned from the study

- Subjects rejected any next attempt of intravenous cannulation

- Subjects who received anesthetic drugs before intravenous cannulation.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Vein Display Instrument


Locations

Country Name City State
Indonesia Cipto Mangunkusumo Central National Hospital Jakarta

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Indonesia University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Indonesia, 

References & Publications (13)

Chapman LL, Sullivan B, Pacheco AL, Draleau CP, Becker BM. VeinViewer-assisted Intravenous catheter placement in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):966-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01155.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19. — View Citation

Chiao FB, Resta-Flarer F, Lesser J, Ng J, Ganz A, Pino-Luey D, Bennett H, Perkins C Jr, Witek B. Vein visualization: patient characteristic factors and efficacy of a new infrared vein finder technology. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):966-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet003. Epub 2013 Feb 5. — View Citation

de Negri DC, Avelar AF, Andreoni S, Pedreira Mda L. Predisposing factors for peripheral intravenous puncture failure in children. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012 Nov-Dec;20(6):1072-80. English, Portuguese, Spanish. — View Citation

Donaldson JS. Pediatric vascular access. Pediatr Radiol. 2006 May;36(5):386-97. Epub 2006 Mar 15. Review. — View Citation

Doniger SJ, Ishimine P, Fox JC, Kanegaye JT. Randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement versus traditional techniques in difficult-access pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Mar;25(3):154-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31819a8946. — View Citation

John JM. Transillumination for vascular access: old concept, new technology. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Feb;17(2):197-8. — View Citation

Kaddoum RN, Anghelescu DL, Parish ME, Wright BB, Trujillo L, Wu J, Wu Y, Burgoyne LL. A randomized controlled trial comparing the AccuVein AV300 device to standard insertion technique for intravenous cannulation of anesthetized children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Sep;22(9):884-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03896.x. Epub 2012 Jun 14. — View Citation

Kim MJ, Park JM, Rhee N, Je SM, Hong SH, Lee YM, Chung SP, Kim SH. Efficacy of VeinViewer in pediatric peripheral intravenous access: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Jul;171(7):1121-5. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1713-9. Epub 2012 Mar 14. — View Citation

Lamperti M, Pittiruti M. II. Difficult peripheral veins: turn on the lights. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):888-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet078. — View Citation

Myers LA, Arteaga GM, Kolb LJ, Lohse CM, Russi CS. Prehospital peripheral intravenous vascular access success rates in children. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):425-8. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.818180. Epub 2013 Aug 16. — View Citation

Scales K. Vascular access: a guide to peripheral venous cannulation. Nurs Stand. 2005 Aug 17-23;19(49):48-52. Review. — View Citation

Schindler E, Schears GJ, Hall SR, Yamamoto T. Ultrasound for vascular access in pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Oct;22(10):1002-7. doi: 10.1111/pan.12005. Review. — View Citation

Simhi E, Kachko L, Bruckheimer E, Katz J. A vein entry indicator device for facilitating peripheral intravenous cannulation in children: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1531-5. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318185cdab. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Successful first vein cannulation attempt Whether the first vein cannulation attempt successful or not will be recorded Day 1