Outcome
| Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
| Other |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean subjective social status by the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status community ladder immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
The MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status community ladder consists of a self-reported visual analog scale, whereby respondents place themselves on a ladder rung according to their perceived social standing relative to others in their community. Responses can take a value from 1-10, with a higher score indicating higher perceived social status in relation to others' within ones' community. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean subjective social status by the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status community ladder at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
The MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status community ladder consists of a self-reported visual analog scale, whereby respondents place themselves on a ladder rung according to their perceived social standing relative to others in their community. Responses can take a value from 1-10, with a higher score indicating higher perceived social status in relation to others' within ones' community. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
|
| Other |
Dose response for impact of intervention on overall diet quality (by Health Eating Index-2015) by number of food coupons redeemed immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Objective data on number of coupons redeemed (0-112) over 10-15 weeks. Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. |
Coupon redemption assessed weekly from baseline (0 weeks) to post-intervention (10-15 weeks). Diet quality assessed twice at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Dose response for impact of intervention on overall diet quality (by Health Eating Index-2015) by number of food coupons redeemed at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Objective data on number of coupons redeemed (0-112) over 10-15 weeks. Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. |
Coupon redemption assessed weekly from baseline (0 weeks) to 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). Diet quality assessed twice at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Dose response for impact of intervention on overall diet quality (by Healthy Eating Index-2015) by number of skill-building activities attended immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Objective data on number of nutrition skill-building activities attended over 10-15 weeks. Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. |
Participation in skill-building assessed weekly from baseline (0 weeks) to post-intervention (10-15 weeks). Dietary intake assessed twice at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Dose response for impact of intervention on overall diet quality (by Healthy Eating Index-2015) by number of skill-building activities attended at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Objective data on number of nutrition skill-building activities attended over 10-15 weeks. Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. |
Participation in skill-building assessed weekly from baseline (0 weeks) to 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). Dietary intake assessed twice at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Subgroup analysis for impact of intervention on overall diet quality (assessed by Healthy Eating Index-2015) by sex immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Self-reported sex (male, female). Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. |
Sex assessed once at baseline. Dietary intake assessed at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Subgroup analysis for impact of intervention on overall diet quality (assessed by Healthy Eating Index-2015) by age immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Self-reported age. Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. |
Age assessed once at baseline. Dietary intake assessed at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Subgroup analysis for impact of intervention on overall diet quality (assessed by Healthy Eating Index-2015) by sex at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Self-reported sex (male, female). Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. |
Sex assessed once at baseline. Dietary intake assessed at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Subgroup analysis for impact of intervention on overall diet quality (assessed by Healthy Eating Index-2015) by age at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Self-reported age. Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. |
Age assessed once at baseline. Dietary intake assessed at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Subgroup analysis for impact of intervention on secondary outcomes by sex immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Self-reported sex (male, female). |
Sex assessed once at baseline. Secondary outcomes assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Subgroup analysis for impact of intervention on secondary outcomes by age immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Self-reported age. |
Age assessed once at baseline. Secondary outcomes assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Subgroup analysis for impact of intervention on secondary outcomes by age at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Self-reported age. |
Age assessed once at baseline. Secondary outcomes assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Subgroup analysis for impact of intervention on secondary outcomes by sex at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Self-reported sex (male, female). |
Sex assessed once at baseline. Secondary outcomes assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Other |
Food purchasing at farmers' markets |
Self-reported and objective data on food purchasing using coupons and own money (including food type and dollar amount) at farmers' markets |
Assessed weekly from baseline (0 weeks) to post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
|
| Other |
Nutrition skill-building activity attendance |
Objective data on attendance to nutrition skill-building activities (including number and types of activities) |
Assessed weekly from baseline (0 weeks) to post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
|
| Primary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean overall diet quality by Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls and can range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher diet quality. |
Assessed at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Primary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean overall diet quality by Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls and can range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher diet quality. |
Assessed at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean mental well-being scores by Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Items on the 14-item Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale are self-reported over the past two weeks. There are 14 items with 5 response categories (1=none of the time; 5=all of the time), summed to provide a single score ranging from 14-70. A higher score indicates higher perceived mental well-being. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean mental well-being scores by Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Items on the 14-item Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale are self-reported over the past two weeks. There are 14 items with 5 response categories (1=none of the time; 5=all of the time), summed to provide a single score ranging from 14-70. A higher score indicates higher perceived mental well-being. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean sense of community by the Brief Sense of Community scale immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Items on the 8-item Brief Sense of Community Scale are self-reported in which each item is scored using a Likert Scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Scores can range from 8-40. A higher score indicates a stronger sense of community. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean sense of community by the Brief Sense of Community scale at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Items on the 8-item Brief Sense of Community Scale are self-reported in which each item is scored using a Likert Scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Scores can range from 8-40. A higher score indicates a stronger sense of community. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in the odds of experiencing household food insecurity immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Items on the 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module are self-reported in relation to experiences in the past month. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in the odds of experiencing household food insecurity at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Items on the 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module are self-reported in relation to experiences in the past month. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in the odds of malnutrition by Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Items on the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool are self-reported and based on BMI (scored as 0= >20, 1= 18.5-20, 2 = <18.5) and percent of unplanned weight loss in the past 3-4 months (scored as 0 = <5%, 1 = 5-10%, 2 = >10%). Overall risk of malnutrition will be scored as 0=low risk, 1= medium risk, and >= 2= high risk. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in the odds of malnutrition by Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Items on the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool are self-reported and based on BMI (scored as 0= >20, 1= 18.5-20, 2 = <18.5) and percent of unplanned weight loss in the past 3-4 months (scored as 0 = <5%, 1 = 5-10%, 2 = >10%). Overall risk of malnutrition will be scored as 0=low risk, 1= medium risk, and >= 2= high risk. |
Assessed once at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean diet quality subscores by Healthy Eating Index-2015 immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks) |
Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. Subscores include adequacy (total fruits, whole fruits, total vegetables, greens and beans, whole grains, dairy, total protein foods, seafood and plant proteins, fatty acids) and moderation components (refined grains, sodium, added sugars, saturated fats), each of which are scored from 0-5 or 0-10. |
Assessed at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (10-15 weeks). |
|
| Secondary |
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean diet quality subscores by Healthy Eating Index-2015 at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks) |
Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. Subscores include adequacy (total fruits, whole fruits, total vegetables, greens and beans, whole grains, dairy, total protein foods, seafood and plant proteins, fatty acids) and moderation components (refined grains, sodium, added sugars, saturated fats), each of which are scored from 0-5 or 0-10. |
Assessed at each of the following time points: Baseline (0 weeks) and 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). |
|
