Diaphragm Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation: a Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial
Transcutaneous electrical phrenic nerve stimulation (TEPNS) and transcutaneous electrical diaphragm stimulation (TEDS) are modalities that use surface electrodes placed on the patients' skin to generate action potentials and contractions of the muscle fibers of the diaphragm. The primary objective will be to evaluate the efficacy of TEPNS and TEDS in healthy adult individuals. Secondary objectives will be to assess the feasibility, safety, and level of discomfort reported by the individual resulting from the application of TEPNS and TEDS.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 12 |
Est. completion date | March 1, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 1, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 60 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age between 18 and 60 years; - Normal pulmonary function test, without alterations, assessed through spirometry; - Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2. Exclusion Criteria: - Smokers or former smokers; - Individuals with previously known cardiopulmonary diseases (restrictive lung diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - COPD, asthma, cystic fibrosis, among other pathologies); - Presence of implanted electrical devices (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, among others); - Individuals who have contraindications to undergo evaluation and/or application of transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the diaphragm muscle, such as: altered sensitivity, wounds at the site of application, deformities, among other conditions. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Hospital Sírio Libanês | São Paulo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hospital Sirio-Libanes | Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein |
Brazil,
Boon AJ, Harper CJ, Ghahfarokhi LS, Strommen JA, Watson JC, Sorenson EJ. Two-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the diaphragm: quantitative values in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve. 2013 Jun;47(6):884-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.23702. Epub 2013 Apr 29. — View Citation
Cancelliero-Gaiad KM, Ike D, Pantoni CB, Mendes RG, Borghi-Silva A, Costa D. Acute effects of transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation on respiratory pattern in COPD patients: cross-sectional and comparative clinical trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013 Nov-Dec;17(6):547-55. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000121. Epub 2013 Nov 14. — View Citation
Canella C, Demondion X, Delebarre A, Moraux A, Cotten H, Cotten A. Anatomical study of phrenic nerve using ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2010 Mar;20(3):659-65. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1579-z. Epub 2009 Sep 2. — View Citation
Carrillo-Esper R, Perez-Calatayud AA, Arch-Tirado E, Diaz-Carrillo MA, Garrido-Aguirre E, Tapia-Velazco R, Pena-Perez CA, Espinoza-de Los Monteros I, Meza-Marquez JM, Flores-Rivera OI, Zepeda-Mendoza AD, de la Torre-Leon T. Standardization of Sonographic Diaphragm Thickness Evaluations in Healthy Volunteers. Respir Care. 2016 Jul;61(7):920-4. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03999. Epub 2016 Apr 12. — View Citation
Hedenstierna G, Tokics L, Lundquist H, Andersson T, Strandberg A, Brismar B. Phrenic nerve stimulation during halothane anesthesia. Effects of atelectasis. Anesthesiology. 1994 Apr;80(4):751-60. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199404000-00006. — View Citation
Santana PV, Cardenas LZ, Albuquerque ALP, Carvalho CRR, Caruso P. Diaphragmatic ultrasound: a review of its methodological aspects and clinical uses. J Bras Pneumol. 2020 Nov 20;46(6):e20200064. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200064. eCollection 2020. — View Citation
Testa A, Soldati G, Giannuzzi R, Berardi S, Portale G, Gentiloni Silveri N. Ultrasound M-mode assessment of diaphragmatic kinetics by anterior transverse scanning in healthy subjects. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Jan;37(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.10.004. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Diaphragm mobility | The assessment of diaphragmatic mobility will use a "convex" type transducer (2-6 MHz), positioned in the right subcostal space, at the midclavicular line, tilted in the cephalic direction. The B-mode visualization window will initially be used to locate the diaphragmatic hemi-dome. Upon acquiring a good quality image, respiratory excursions will be measured in M-mode, using the inferior vena cava and the gallbladder as anatomical parameters. Diaphragmatic mobility measurement will be considered as the distance, in centimeters, between the baseline at expiration and its greatest vertical displacement at inspiration produced by diaphragmatic movement. | At baseline, between the fourth and fifth minutes and between the ninth and tenth minutes after the start of stimulation. | |
Primary | Diaphragm thickness | Diaphragm thickness (Tdi) will be obtained using a high-frequency "linear" type transducer (7-13 MHz), positioned over the zone of apposition (ZA) of the diaphragm muscle. The approximate location is between the 8th and 9th intercostal space, between the anterior axillary line and the midaxillary line, 0.5 to 2.0 cm below the costophrenic angle. The depth will be 1.5 to 3.0 cm, and the diaphragm muscle will be identified as the innermost portion of the hypoechoic muscular layer bounded by two hyperechoic membranes, the pleura - superficial line, and the peritoneum - deeper line. "Tdi" will be measured from the inner edge of the pleural line to the inner edge of the peritoneal line at the end of expiration (Tdi-exp); and at the end of inspiration (Tdi-insp). | At baseline, between the fourth and fifth minutes and between the ninth and tenth minutes after the start of stimulation. | |
Primary | Thickening fraction | The thickening fraction will be obtained using a high-frequency "linear" type transducer (7-13 MHz), positioned over the zone of apposition (ZA) of the diaphragm muscle. The approximate location is between the 8th and 9th intercostal space, between the anterior axillary line and the midaxillary line, 0.5 to 2.0 cm below the costophrenic angle. The depth will be 1.5 to 3.0 cm, and the diaphragm muscle will be identified as the innermost portion of the hypoechoic muscular layer bounded by two hyperechoic membranes, the pleura - superficial line, and the peritoneum - deeper line. The localization of structures and measurements will be performed in B-mode. The diaphragm thickening fraction will be calculated as the percentage of thickness increment during inspiration relative to the thickness at the end of expiration. | At baseline, between the fourth and fifth minutes and between the ninth and tenth minutes after the start of stimulation. | |
Secondary | Evaluation of sensory discomfort | The assessment of reported sensory discomfort will be measured through the application of the horizontal numerical scale of sensory discomfort. The numerical scale will be presented to participants in its printed version, on standardized paper measuring 10 centimeters in length. The value "0" (zero) will be assigned to the concept of "absence of discomfort," and the value "10" (ten) will be assigned to the concept of "greatest imaginable discomfort." | At baseline, five and 10 minutes the start of stimulation. | |
Secondary | Safety of TEPNS and TEDS application | Safety criteria will be measured through the occurrence of the number of adverse events, including: Mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg; heart rate > 140 bpm or < 50 bpm; arrhythmias occurrence; oxygen saturation dropping below 88%; temperature increase (above 37.7°C); presence of reported pain above 7 on the visual analog pain scale; presence of burns at the site where electrodes were placed for electrostimulation. The numbers of adverse events will be recorded, along with their classification according to the World Health Organization Patient Safety Document as follows: no harm, minor, moderate, severe, and death. | The events will be monitored throughout the entire period of TEPNS and TEDS application. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02916342 -
Interscalene Block Versus Combined Supraprascapular: Axillary Nerve Blocks
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02801058 -
Ultrasound Evaluation of Changes in Diaphragm Induced by Osteopathic Manipulative Techniques
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03688724 -
Perioperative Diaphragm Point of Care Ultrasound
|
||
Completed |
NCT04052230 -
Evolution of Diaphragm Thickness Under Veno-arterial ECMO
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03827538 -
Endobronchial Valves Positioning Effects On Diaphragm Function In Patients With Lung Hyperinflation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05965830 -
Comparing Electromyography of the Diaphragm With Ultrasound in Neonates and Children With Respiratory Support
|
||
Completed |
NCT06086769 -
High Flow Oxygen Therapy Effect on Healthy Subjects
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03129386 -
Defining the Normal Range for Maximal Sniff Diaphragm Thickening Fraction
|
||
Completed |
NCT05670327 -
Diaphragmatic Ultrasound and Weaning After Lung Transplant.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06009731 -
Diaphragmatic Speckle Tracking During Spontaneous Breathing Trial
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT01053182 -
Esophagectomy Associated Respiratory Complications: Ivor-Lewis Versus Sweet Approaches
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04333186 -
Expiratory Muscle Function in Critically Ill Ventilated Patients
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05529641 -
Effects of Diaphragmatic Resistance Training in People With Chronic Neck Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06347549 -
The Impact of Diaphragmatic Breathing Instructions and Inspiratory Pressures on Diaphragm Contraction in Healthy Adults
|
||
Completed |
NCT02725190 -
Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Diaphragm Command During an Inspiratory Endurance Trial in Healthy Volunteers.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03114384 -
Patient-ventilator Asynchrony During Noninvasive Ventilation Assessed Using Diaphragm Ultrasonography
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06348745 -
Trans Thoracic Ultrasound to Assess Diaphragmatic Function in Stable COPD Versus Bronchial Asthma.
|
N/A |