View clinical trials related to Diabetic Macular Edema.
Filter by:This is a clinical study where patients with diabetes and a vision threatening eye condition called "Diabetic Macular Edema" receive four injections into the eye at monthly intervals. The patients will already have tried the standard of care without complete success. The patients will be randomized to receive either a high dose, a low dose or a sham control treatment. The study will evaluate whether the new treatment improves vision and whether it changes the underlying course of the disease in the eye.
The study aims to compare the effect of intravitreal non steroidal anti inflammatory (Diclofenac) versus the standard treatment of diabetic macular edema, intravitreal anti vascular endothelial growth factor (Ranibizumab), measuring central macular thickness changes and best corrected visual acuity.
This is a one month pre post intervention study. Subjects with diabetic macular edema were given intravitreal anti VEGF (Aflibercept) injection. Central retinal thickness, macular electrophysiology, and visual acuity were observed one week and one month after injection was given to the eye to describe early anatomical, physiological, and clinical changes. We hypothesized that changes to these outcomes can be found and documented.
A two part, multi-center study consisting of a Phase 1b open label, sequential dose escalation followed by a Phase 2a randomized, double-masked, dose expansion evaluating OPT-302 in combination with aflibercept in participants with persistent central-involved Diabetic Macular Edema.
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of aflibercept (Eylea®) using two different treatment protocols in patients with vision loss from diabetic macular edema. While one group will be treated with an optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided 'treat and extend' regimen, the other group will be treated according to a visual acuity (VA) guided 'treat and extend' protocol. The patients will be randomized into two treatment arms using an automated randomization algorithm.
Between December 2016 and June 2017 a total of 40 eyes from 40 diabetic retinopathy patients with diabetic macular edema were recruited at the Ophthalmologic Clinic of University "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
This study will be a retrospective analysis of vitrectomy results in patients suffering from diabetic macular edema.
This phase I/II trial is designed to provide proof of concept evidence that combination therapy can have a beneficial effect on DME and possibly prevent increases in retinal volume or progression of non-central DME into the central subfield of the macula. If a beneficial effect is apparent in this phase I/II study involving a relatively small sample size and short follow-up period, its results could be used to in plan future phase III trials. We believe this study will be the first to show that a systems pharmacology approach can successfully address diabetic macular edema, and thus revolutionize the treatment of complex retinal diseases for which there are a paucity of effective treatment options.
Despite improved glycemic and systemic control for many patients with diabetes, over the past several decades, diabetic retinopathy (DR) develops and progresses in a large proportion of patients, and visual loss from diabetic eye complications continues to be a leading cause of blindness in the US and other developed countries worldwide. Thus, even a modest ability to prevent DR onset or to slow DR worsening might substantially reduce the number of patients at risk for diabetes-related vision loss worldwide. Widespread use of an oral agent effective at reducing worsening of DR might also decrease the numbers of patients who undergo treatment for DR and diabetic macular edema (DME) and who are consequently at risk for side effects that adversely affect visual function. Two major studies of fenofibrate, the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) and The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)-eye study, have demonstrated clinically important reduction in progression of retinopathy in patients with diabetes assigned to fibrate compared with placebo. However, despite the positive clinical trial results, fenofibrate has not gained wide acceptance as a preventive agent by either ophthalmologists or primary diabetes care providers. Thus, it is important to provide further evidence demonstrating whether or not selectively increasing peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activity reduces progression of retinopathy in patients with diabetes and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy at baseline. Pemafibrate is a more potent and selective PPARα modulator than fenofibrate. Its efficacy is currently being evaluated in the Pemafibrate to Reduce Cardiovascular OutcoMes by Reducing Triglycerides IN patiENts With diabeTes (PROMINENT) study for prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Given the large study cohort with a substantial proportion likely to have DR and the multi-year duration of the PROMINENT trial, this study represents a unique opportunity to assess effects of chronic PPARα activation through pemafibrate therapy on DR outcomes. Primary Study Objective: To assess whether treatment with pemafibrate (0.2 mg orally BID) compared with placebo reduces the hazard rate of diabetic retinopathy worsening in adults with type 2 diabetes and diabetic retinopathy without neovascularization in at least one eye who are participating in the parent PROMINENT trial.
This is a phase 4 prospective, nonrandomized, open label, interventional clinical trial. Study eyes will receive 5 required initial monthly Intravitreal Aflibercept (IAI) doses of 2 mg followed by 2q8 IAI for a total of 52 weeks; only one study eye from each patient will be enrolled.