Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06189638
Other study ID # 280800-JSPL-PL-5-203
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date January 8, 2024
Est. completion date June 30, 2025

Study information

Verified date December 2023
Source Jiangsu ProteLight Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Contact Ming M Liu, MD, MS
Phone +86-15692176002
Email liu.ming@protelight.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray in patients with mild infections of diabetic foot ulcers. Eligible subjects will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive twice a day, 14 days treatment of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (1‰), Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (2‰) and topical placebo (vehicle) spray. In this study, the cut-off date for final analysis is defined as the time when all subjects have completed the last visit or discontinued the study


Description:

This is a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray in patients with mild infections of diabetic foot ulcers. Approximately 90 patients (30 per treatment group) will be randomized in this study. Eligible subjects will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive twice a day, 14 days treatment of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (1‰), Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (2‰) and placebo of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (vehicle). In this study, the cut-off date for final analysis is defined as the time when all subjects have completed the last visit or discontinued the study. The duration of the whole study is planned for 24 months; the duration of each participant is about 4-5 weeks, including Screening period/Baseline (about 7 days), treatment period (about 14 days), Follow-up period (about 7-14 days). No interim analysis will be performed in this study. This study is a phase II study, and no statistical hypothesis is proposed.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 90
Est. completion date June 30, 2025
Est. primary completion date December 30, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age between 18 to 65 years. 2. Non-hospitalized ambulatory subjects with Diabetes mellitus, Type I or II, according to the American Diabetes Association criteria. 3. HbA1c =12% at screening. 4. At baseline visit (after any required debridement), presence of Grade 2 diabetic foot infection [Grade 2 of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) classification] Infection present, as defined by the presence of at least 2 of the following items: - Local swelling or induration - Erythema >0.5 cm to =2 cm around the ulcer. - Local tenderness or pain - Local increased warmth - Purulent discharge (thick, opaque to white, or sanguineous secretion) Mild infection of an ulcer is defined as: Presence of =2 manifestations of inflammation (purulence or erythema, tenderness, warmth, or induration), but any cellulitis/erythema extends =2cm around the ulcer, and infection is limited to the skin or superficial subcutaneous tissues; no other local complications or systemic illness. 5. Voluntary written consent, given before performance of any clinical investigation-related procedure not part of standard medical care, and with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn at any time without prejudice to future medical care. 6. Female subjects must meet at least one of the following additional criteria: - Surgically sterile with bilateral tubal ligation or hysterectomy. - Postmenopausal for at least one year. - If of childbearing potential, practicing an acceptable method of birth control for the duration of the clinical investigation as judged by the Investigator, such as condoms, foams, jellies, diaphragm, intrauterine device or abstinence Exclusion Criteria: 1. Another cause of the inflammatory response of the skin around the ulcer (such as a trauma, gout, acute Charcot neuro-arthropathy, fracture, thrombosis, or venous stasis). 2. Foot deformities, calluses, corns, ingrown nails, fungal infections, which will impact infection or wound healing based on Investigator's judgement. 3. Received any topical or systemic antimicrobial therapy within 7 days prior to study entry (Day 1). 4. Infected diabetic foot ulcer that is associated with local wound complications such as prosthetic materials or protruding surgical hardware. 5. > 1 infected foot ulcer. 6. Concurrent or expected to require systemic antimicrobials during the study period for any infection, including diabetic foot ulcer. 7. Bone or joint involvement is suspected based on clinical examination or plain X-ray. 8. Arterial brachial index (ABI) <0.5 or ankle pressure <50 mmHg. If ABI is >1.3 (medial calcification is present), then only subjects meeting secondary testing requirements including either a toe pressure =30 mmHg, a transcutaneous pressure of oxygen =50 mmHg, or a skin perfusion pressure =40 mmHg are allowed. For subjects with ABI >1.3, only the initial secondary test after ABI should be used for this assessment. A documented ABI within 3 months prior to Screening is acceptable, as is the initially performed secondary testing method for subjects with ABI >1.3. 9. The subject is expected to be unable to care for the ulcer or return for all scheduled visits because of hospitalization, vacation, disability, etc. during the study period or cannot safely monitor the infection status at home. 10. Pregnant or lactating women.

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray and Placebo
Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray At about 5 cm vertically above the wound, the investigator sprays antimicrobial peptide PL-5 topical spray on the test wound. The cover area after spraying is a cone with a surface diameter of about 5 cm and area about 20 cm2. One spray dose is about 0.1 ml. The number of drug sprays is determined according to the wound area in the screening period, and the determined dose is applied consistently. During the operation, an effective spray operation is completely ejected with no leakage.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Bay Area Foot Care Castro Valley California
United States Crisp Regional Hospital Cordele Georgia
United States South Florida Podiatry Deerfield Beach Florida
United States Limb Preservation Platform, Inc. Fresno California
United States Houston Foot and Ankle Care Houston Texas
United States Scripps Clinical Research La Jolla California
United States Central Arkansas VA Hospital Little Rock Arkansas
United States Clemente Clinical Research Los Angeles California
United States Felix Sigal - Foot and Ankle Clinic Los Angeles California
United States Miami Dade Medical Research Institute, LLC Miami Florida
United States Stanford Health Care (SHC) - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic Palo Alto California
United States Havana Research Institute Pasadena Florida
United States Western University of Health Sciences Pomona California
United States Doctor Research Network South Miami Florida
United States Foot & Ankle Center of Illinois Springfield Illinois
United States Essential Medical Research Tulsa Oklahoma
United States Wake Forest Baptist Health - Wound Care and Hyperbaric Center Winston-Salem North Carolina

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Jiangsu ProteLight Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Parexel

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Wei Y, Wu J, Chen Y, Fan K, Yu X, Li X, Zhao Y, Li Y, Lv G, Song G, Rong X, Lin C, Wang H, Chen X, Zhang P, Han C, Zu H, Liu W, Zhang Y, Liu C, Su Y, Zhang B, Sun B, Wang L, Lai W, Liu J, Xia C, Ji G, Zhu F, Yu J, Ahemaiti A, Dong H, Chen M; PL-5 Investig — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Clinical response the Investigator will grade the clinical response as (1)"infection resolved or cured" (all signs and symptoms of infection resolved);(2)"infection improving"(most, but not all, signs and symptoms of infection improved or resolved)(3)"treatment failure" (=1 signs or symptoms of infection substantially worsening), (4)"unevaluable"(<3 days of study treatment or patient lost to follow-up), or (5)"recurrence"(a previously cured or improved infection showing worsening of signs or symptoms of infection) At EOT (End-of-therapy: within 24 hours after the final dose)
Secondary Microbiological response Microbiological culture examination of wound tissue; Analysis of drug sensitivity test results; Analysis of MIC50, MIC90, geometric mean inhibitory concentration and range results of clinically isolated pathogenic bacteria. At baseline, day 1, and at all other study visits, Investigators will culture samples obtained from the wound at which culturable material and signs of infection are present. They will obtain specimens using tissue curettage with a sterile scalpel, place them into transport media, and ship them to the designated central laboratory for species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. For specific operations of bacteriological examination of wound tissue, please refer to the clinical microbiology operation manual. Result: 1)Resolved;2) Improved;3)Failure 4) Colonization 5) Superinfection. Interim Clinical Evaluation (ICE): 7 days after the initiation of the study drug. End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE): 7-14 days after the final dose.
Secondary Comprehensive Response At EOT and PTE, the Investigator will grade the comprehensive response as (1)"cure"(patients are clinically cured, and the bacteria are eradicated or presumed eradicated.);(2)"failure" (patients are classified as clinical failure or/and microbiological responses are failure and superinfection) or (3)"indeterminate"(if both clinical and microbiological responses are indeterminate). End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE):7-14 days after the final dose.
Secondary Safety and tolerability The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), and clinically significant changes in physical examination, vital signs, laboratory tests, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) Interim Clinical Evaluation (ICE): 7 days after the initiation of the study drug. End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE): 7-14 days after the final dose
Secondary Clinical response At each visit after enrollment, the Investigator will grade the clinical response as (1)"infection resolved or cured" (all signs and symptoms of infection resolved);(2)"infection improving"(most, but not all, signs and symptoms of infection improved or resolved)(3)"treatment failure" (=1 signs or symptoms of infection substantially worsening), (4)"unevaluable"(<3 days of study treatment or patient lost to follow-up), or (5)"recurrence"(a previously cured or improved infection showing worsening of signs or symptoms of infection) Interim Clinical Evaluation (ICE): 7 days after the initiation of the study drug. End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE): 7-14 days after the final dose.
Secondary Wound infection Score and Total Wound Score A "wound infection score" was semiquantitatively assessed by grading each of 7 parameters with a score of 0-3: (1) purulent drainage, (2) nonpurulent drainage, (3) erythema, (4) induration, (5) tenderness, (6) pain, and (7) local warmth. At baseline, day 1, and at all other study visits, investigators will compile a "total wound score" that included ratings of signs and symptoms of infection, wound measurements (maximum length, width, and depth), and assessment of granulation tissue.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02652754 - Safety Study to Examine the Systemic Exposure of Granexin® Gel After Topical Application to Diabetic Foot Ulcers Phase 1
Completed NCT01070433 - A Clinical Study of the Safety and Efficacy of MEBO Wound Ointment in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers Phase 2
Completed NCT00971048 - Evaluation of the Effects of HP828-101 Versus Standard of Care in the Management of Partial or Full Thickness Wounds N/A
Terminated NCT00762138 - The AutoloGel™ Post-Market Surveillance (TAPS) Program N/A
Completed NCT00578604 - Non-Invasive Assessment of Wound Healing With Optical Methods N/A
Completed NCT05417425 - Omeza Products in Combination With Standard of Care for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Phase 1
Completed NCT02631512 - Evaluation of Woulgan in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Phase 4
Terminated NCT01816633 - Effectiveness of AutoloGel Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers N/A
Completed NCT02222376 - Effect of Topic Pirfenidone in Diabetic Ulcers Phase 3
Completed NCT01221207 - Instant Total Contact Cast to Heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers N/A
Completed NCT01454401 - LeucoPatch™ Study A Multicenter Study on the Effect of LeucoPatch™ in Diabetic Foot Ulcers N/A
Completed NCT01291160 - Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Phase 2/Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT01105884 - Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Different Dressing Materials in Diabetic Foot Ulcers N/A
Completed NCT00536744 - Effectiveness of dermaPACE™ Device and Standard Treatment Compared to Standard Treatment Alone for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Phase 3
Terminated NCT00316537 - Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Nicotine Gel to Treat Diabetic Foot Ulcers Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT00013299 - Clinical Trials of Footwear in Patients With Diabetes-Study Arm 2,3 Phase 2
Completed NCT00013286 - A Prospective Study of Endothelial Dysfunction and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Risk Phase 2
Terminated NCT02667327 - A Study of Granexin Gel in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT00916292 - Safety Study of Topical Human FGF-1 for Wound Healing Phase 1
Completed NCT01154374 - A Clinical Study of the Safety and Efficacy of MEBO® Wound Ointment in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers (Pilot) Phase 2