Diabetic Foot Ulcers Clinical Trial
— PL-5Official title:
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray in Patients With Mild Infections of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
This is a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray in patients with mild infections of diabetic foot ulcers. Eligible subjects will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive twice a day, 14 days treatment of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (1‰), Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 Topical Spray (2‰) and topical placebo (vehicle) spray. In this study, the cut-off date for final analysis is defined as the time when all subjects have completed the last visit or discontinued the study
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 30, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age between 18 to 65 years. 2. Non-hospitalized ambulatory subjects with Diabetes mellitus, Type I or II, according to the American Diabetes Association criteria. 3. HbA1c =12% at screening. 4. At baseline visit (after any required debridement), presence of Grade 2 diabetic foot infection [Grade 2 of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) classification] Infection present, as defined by the presence of at least 2 of the following items: - Local swelling or induration - Erythema >0.5 cm to =2 cm around the ulcer. - Local tenderness or pain - Local increased warmth - Purulent discharge (thick, opaque to white, or sanguineous secretion) Mild infection of an ulcer is defined as: Presence of =2 manifestations of inflammation (purulence or erythema, tenderness, warmth, or induration), but any cellulitis/erythema extends =2cm around the ulcer, and infection is limited to the skin or superficial subcutaneous tissues; no other local complications or systemic illness. 5. Voluntary written consent, given before performance of any clinical investigation-related procedure not part of standard medical care, and with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn at any time without prejudice to future medical care. 6. Female subjects must meet at least one of the following additional criteria: - Surgically sterile with bilateral tubal ligation or hysterectomy. - Postmenopausal for at least one year. - If of childbearing potential, practicing an acceptable method of birth control for the duration of the clinical investigation as judged by the Investigator, such as condoms, foams, jellies, diaphragm, intrauterine device or abstinence Exclusion Criteria: 1. Another cause of the inflammatory response of the skin around the ulcer (such as a trauma, gout, acute Charcot neuro-arthropathy, fracture, thrombosis, or venous stasis). 2. Foot deformities, calluses, corns, ingrown nails, fungal infections, which will impact infection or wound healing based on Investigator's judgement. 3. Received any topical or systemic antimicrobial therapy within 7 days prior to study entry (Day 1). 4. Infected diabetic foot ulcer that is associated with local wound complications such as prosthetic materials or protruding surgical hardware. 5. > 1 infected foot ulcer. 6. Concurrent or expected to require systemic antimicrobials during the study period for any infection, including diabetic foot ulcer. 7. Bone or joint involvement is suspected based on clinical examination or plain X-ray. 8. Arterial brachial index (ABI) <0.5 or ankle pressure <50 mmHg. If ABI is >1.3 (medial calcification is present), then only subjects meeting secondary testing requirements including either a toe pressure =30 mmHg, a transcutaneous pressure of oxygen =50 mmHg, or a skin perfusion pressure =40 mmHg are allowed. For subjects with ABI >1.3, only the initial secondary test after ABI should be used for this assessment. A documented ABI within 3 months prior to Screening is acceptable, as is the initially performed secondary testing method for subjects with ABI >1.3. 9. The subject is expected to be unable to care for the ulcer or return for all scheduled visits because of hospitalization, vacation, disability, etc. during the study period or cannot safely monitor the infection status at home. 10. Pregnant or lactating women. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Bay Area Foot Care | Castro Valley | California |
United States | Crisp Regional Hospital | Cordele | Georgia |
United States | South Florida Podiatry | Deerfield Beach | Florida |
United States | Limb Preservation Platform, Inc. | Fresno | California |
United States | Houston Foot and Ankle Care | Houston | Texas |
United States | Scripps Clinical Research | La Jolla | California |
United States | Central Arkansas VA Hospital | Little Rock | Arkansas |
United States | Clemente Clinical Research | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Felix Sigal - Foot and Ankle Clinic | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Miami Dade Medical Research Institute, LLC | Miami | Florida |
United States | Stanford Health Care (SHC) - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic | Palo Alto | California |
United States | Havana Research Institute | Pasadena | Florida |
United States | Western University of Health Sciences | Pomona | California |
United States | Doctor Research Network | South Miami | Florida |
United States | Foot & Ankle Center of Illinois | Springfield | Illinois |
United States | Essential Medical Research | Tulsa | Oklahoma |
United States | Wake Forest Baptist Health - Wound Care and Hyperbaric Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Jiangsu ProteLight Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Co., Ltd. | Parexel |
United States,
Wei Y, Wu J, Chen Y, Fan K, Yu X, Li X, Zhao Y, Li Y, Lv G, Song G, Rong X, Lin C, Wang H, Chen X, Zhang P, Han C, Zu H, Liu W, Zhang Y, Liu C, Su Y, Zhang B, Sun B, Wang L, Lai W, Liu J, Xia C, Ji G, Zhu F, Yu J, Ahemaiti A, Dong H, Chen M; PL-5 Investig — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Clinical response | the Investigator will grade the clinical response as (1)"infection resolved or cured" (all signs and symptoms of infection resolved);(2)"infection improving"(most, but not all, signs and symptoms of infection improved or resolved)(3)"treatment failure" (=1 signs or symptoms of infection substantially worsening), (4)"unevaluable"(<3 days of study treatment or patient lost to follow-up), or (5)"recurrence"(a previously cured or improved infection showing worsening of signs or symptoms of infection) | At EOT (End-of-therapy: within 24 hours after the final dose) | |
Secondary | Microbiological response | Microbiological culture examination of wound tissue; Analysis of drug sensitivity test results; Analysis of MIC50, MIC90, geometric mean inhibitory concentration and range results of clinically isolated pathogenic bacteria. At baseline, day 1, and at all other study visits, Investigators will culture samples obtained from the wound at which culturable material and signs of infection are present. They will obtain specimens using tissue curettage with a sterile scalpel, place them into transport media, and ship them to the designated central laboratory for species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. For specific operations of bacteriological examination of wound tissue, please refer to the clinical microbiology operation manual. Result: 1)Resolved;2) Improved;3)Failure 4) Colonization 5) Superinfection. | Interim Clinical Evaluation (ICE): 7 days after the initiation of the study drug. End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE): 7-14 days after the final dose. | |
Secondary | Comprehensive Response | At EOT and PTE, the Investigator will grade the comprehensive response as (1)"cure"(patients are clinically cured, and the bacteria are eradicated or presumed eradicated.);(2)"failure" (patients are classified as clinical failure or/and microbiological responses are failure and superinfection) or (3)"indeterminate"(if both clinical and microbiological responses are indeterminate). | End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE):7-14 days after the final dose. | |
Secondary | Safety and tolerability | The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), and clinically significant changes in physical examination, vital signs, laboratory tests, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) | Interim Clinical Evaluation (ICE): 7 days after the initiation of the study drug. End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE): 7-14 days after the final dose | |
Secondary | Clinical response | At each visit after enrollment, the Investigator will grade the clinical response as (1)"infection resolved or cured" (all signs and symptoms of infection resolved);(2)"infection improving"(most, but not all, signs and symptoms of infection improved or resolved)(3)"treatment failure" (=1 signs or symptoms of infection substantially worsening), (4)"unevaluable"(<3 days of study treatment or patient lost to follow-up), or (5)"recurrence"(a previously cured or improved infection showing worsening of signs or symptoms of infection) | Interim Clinical Evaluation (ICE): 7 days after the initiation of the study drug. End of Therapy (EOT): within 24 hours after the final dose. Post-therapy evaluation (PTE): 7-14 days after the final dose. | |
Secondary | Wound infection Score and Total Wound Score | A "wound infection score" was semiquantitatively assessed by grading each of 7 parameters with a score of 0-3: (1) purulent drainage, (2) nonpurulent drainage, (3) erythema, (4) induration, (5) tenderness, (6) pain, and (7) local warmth. | At baseline, day 1, and at all other study visits, investigators will compile a "total wound score" that included ratings of signs and symptoms of infection, wound measurements (maximum length, width, and depth), and assessment of granulation tissue. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02652754 -
Safety Study to Examine the Systemic Exposure of Granexin® Gel After Topical Application to Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01070433 -
A Clinical Study of the Safety and Efficacy of MEBO Wound Ointment in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00971048 -
Evaluation of the Effects of HP828-101 Versus Standard of Care in the Management of Partial or Full Thickness Wounds
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00762138 -
The AutoloGel™ Post-Market Surveillance (TAPS) Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00578604 -
Non-Invasive Assessment of Wound Healing With Optical Methods
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05417425 -
Omeza Products in Combination With Standard of Care for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02631512 -
Evaluation of Woulgan in Diabetic Foot Ulcer
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT01816633 -
Effectiveness of AutoloGel Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02222376 -
Effect of Topic Pirfenidone in Diabetic Ulcers
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01221207 -
Instant Total Contact Cast to Heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01454401 -
LeucoPatch™ Study A Multicenter Study on the Effect of LeucoPatch™ in Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01291160 -
Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01105884 -
Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Different Dressing Materials in Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00536744 -
Effectiveness of dermaPACE™ Device and Standard Treatment Compared to Standard Treatment Alone for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00316537 -
Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Nicotine Gel to Treat Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00013299 -
Clinical Trials of Footwear in Patients With Diabetes-Study Arm 2,3
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00013286 -
A Prospective Study of Endothelial Dysfunction and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Risk
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02667327 -
A Study of Granexin Gel in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00916292 -
Safety Study of Topical Human FGF-1 for Wound Healing
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01154374 -
A Clinical Study of the Safety and Efficacy of MEBO® Wound Ointment in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers (Pilot)
|
Phase 2 |