Dermatitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Risankizumab in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Verified date | October 2021 |
Source | AbbVie |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and adolescents.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 172 |
Est. completion date | April 26, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | October 28, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 12 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - adults who are = 18 years old and, where locally permissible and approved, adolescent subjects who are at least 12 years old - a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) with onset of symptoms at least 2 years prior to Baseline and subject meets Hanifin and Rajka criteria - moderate to severe AD at the Baseline Visit - history of inadequate response to previous topical corticosteroid and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor treatments or a medical inability to receive these treatments Exclusion Criteria: - prior exposure to any biologic immunomodulatory agent or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor - concurrent treatment with systemic therapy for AD (biologic or non-biologic) or topical and/or phototherapy treatments |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Skin Health Institute Inc /ID# 204779 | Carlton | Victoria |
Australia | Fremantle Dermatology /ID# 204784 | Fremantle | Western Australia |
Australia | North Eastern Health Specialists /ID# 204785 | Hectorville | South Australia |
Australia | St George Hospital /ID# 204780 | Kogarah | New South Wales |
Australia | Woden Dermatology /ID# 204778 | Phillip | Australian Capital Territory |
Australia | Veracity Clinical Research /ID# 204786 | Woolloongabba | Queensland |
Canada | Beacon Dermatology Inc /ID# 213003 | Calgary | Alberta |
Canada | Kirk Barber Research, CA /ID# 201046 | Calgary | Alberta |
Canada | University of Alberta Hospital - Division of Hematology /ID# 213008 | Edmonton | Alberta |
Canada | Dr. Wei Jing Loo Medicine Prof /ID# 208849 | London | Ontario |
Canada | Lynderm Research Inc. /ID# 201050 | Markham | Ontario |
Canada | Dre Angelique Gagne-Henley M.D. inc. /ID# 208189 | Saint-Jerome | Quebec |
Canada | Medicor Research Inc /ID# 211274 | Sudbury | Ontario |
Japan | Hamamatsu University Hospital /ID# 203270 | Hamamatsu-shi | Shizuoka |
Japan | Teikyo University Hospital /ID# 202884 | Itabashi-ku | Tokyo |
Japan | Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital /ID# 213961 | Kawasaki-shi | Kanagawa |
Japan | Kurume University Hospital /ID# 203139 | Kurume-shi | Fukuoka |
Japan | Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital /ID# 214140 | Nagaoka-shi | Niigata |
Japan | Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Chubu Rosai Hospital /ID# 213667 | Nagoya-shi | Aichi |
Japan | University of the Ryukyus Hospital /ID# 203974 | Nakagami-gun | Okinawa |
Japan | Osaka City University Hospital /ID# 203410 | Osaka-shi | Osaka |
Japan | Tokyo Medical University Hospital /ID# 203647 | Shinjuku-ku | Tokyo |
Japan | Tokyo Medical University Hospital /ID# 204101 | Shinjuku-ku | Tokyo |
Puerto Rico | Dr. Samuel Sanchez PSC /ID# 213117 | Caguas | |
Puerto Rico | Cruz-Santana, Carolina, PR /ID# 213229 | Carolina | |
Puerto Rico | Clinical Research Puerto Rico /ID# 213118 | San Juan | |
United States | Cosmetic Dermatology of Orange County /ID# 205801 | Anaheim | California |
United States | Arlington Research Center, Inc /ID# 215899 | Arlington | Texas |
United States | MetroDerm ACC Research /ID# 205958 | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Oakland Hills Dermatology /ID# 217453 | Auburn Hills | Michigan |
United States | Tekton Research, Inc. /ID# 211558 | Austin | Texas |
United States | Duplicate_Great Lakes Research, Inc. /ID# 206447 | Bay City | Michigan |
United States | UAB Department of Dermatology /ID# 211561 | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Colorado Center for Dermatology, PLLC /ID# 216260 | Centennial | Colorado |
United States | Darst Dermatology /ID# 215100 | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | University Dermatology and Vein Clinic, LLC /ID# 210702 | Darien | Illinois |
United States | Dermatologic SurgiCenter /ID# 208972 | Drexel Hill | Pennsylvania |
United States | Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey /ID# 203203 | East Windsor | New Jersey |
United States | Center for Dermatology Clinical Research /ID# 204950 | Fremont | California |
United States | Rivergate Dermatology & Skin Care Center /ID# 203372 | Goodlettsville | Tennessee |
United States | Dermdox Dermatology Centers, PC /ID# 212259 | Hazleton | Pennsylvania |
United States | Center for Clinical Studies - Houston (Binz) /ID# 203383 | Houston | Texas |
United States | RI SkinDoc /ID# 203417 | Johnston | Rhode Island |
United States | Skin Care Physicians of Georgia /ID# 213188 | Macon | Georgia |
United States | Dermatologists of Southwest Ohio, Inc /ID# 215104 | Mason | Ohio |
United States | Tulane University /ID# 203214 | New Orleans | Louisiana |
United States | Virginia Dermatology & Skin Cancer Center /ID# 210154 | Norfolk | Virginia |
United States | Unity Clinical Research /ID# 217461 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Park Avenue Dermatology, PA /ID# 203378 | Orange Park | Florida |
United States | University of Pittsburgh MC /ID# 203296 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | The Indiana Clinical Trials Center /ID# 211618 | Plainfield | Indiana |
United States | Derm Assoc of Plymouth Meeting /ID# 208925 | Plymouth Meeting | Pennsylvania |
United States | Oregon Derm & Res. Ctr /ID# 202880 | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Health Concepts /ID# 203205 | Rapid City | South Dakota |
United States | Skin Cancer and Dermatology Institute (SCDI) /ID# 213041 | Reno | Nevada |
United States | Dominion Medical Associates /ID# 212986 | Richmond | Virginia |
United States | DermAssociates /ID# 206189 | Rockville | Maryland |
United States | Integrative Skin Science and Research /ID# 212486 | Sacramento | California |
United States | Cosmetic Laser Dermatology /ID# 210560 | San Diego | California |
United States | Therapeutics Clinical Research /ID# 203422 | San Diego | California |
United States | Cognitive Clinical Trials /ID# 208895 | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | Acclaim Dermatology /ID# 213026 | Sugar Land | Texas |
United States | The Vancouver Clinic, INC. PS /ID# 202930 | Vancouver | Washington |
United States | Grekin Skin Institute /ID# 210485 | Warren | Michigan |
United States | Omega Medical Research /ID# 216022 | Warwick | Rhode Island |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
AbbVie |
United States, Australia, Canada, Japan, Puerto Rico,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants Achieving At Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at Week 16 | EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease. |
Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of "0" or "1" With a Reduction From Baseline of = 2 Points at Week 16 | Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) was used to assess the severity of AD based on lesion appearance on the following scale:
0 - Clear: No signs of AD; 1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting; 4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting. |
Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction of = 4 Points in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16 | Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). | Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16 | EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 28 and Week 52 | EASI is used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected and the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling), scratching, and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS means were calculated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with Baseline, treatment and vIGA-AD categories in the model. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 75 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 | EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 50 Response at Week 16 | EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease. EASI 50 response is defined as at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score. |
Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 50 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 | EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease. An EASI 50 response is defined as at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 90 Response at Week 16 | EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease. An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score. |
Baseline, Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 90 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 | EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease. An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of "0" or "1" With a Reduction From Baseline of = 2 Points at Week 28 and Week 52 | Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) was used to assess the severity of AD based on lesion appearance on the following scale:
0 - Clear: No signs of AD; 1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting; 4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis at Week 16 | Body surface area (BSA) affected by atopic dermatitis was assessed by the physician and is expressed as a percentage of the total BSA. For purposes of the estimation, the total surface of the participant's palm plus five digits was assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Percentage of BSA Affected by Atopic Dermatitis at Weeks 28 and 52 | Body surface area (BSA) affected by atopic dermatitis was assessed by the physician and is expressed as a percentage of the total BSA. For purposes of the estimation, the total surface of the participant's palm plus five digits was assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means and standard errors were calculated from ANCOVA with Baseline, treatment and stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories) in the model. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score (SCORAD 50) at Week 16 | SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). | Baseline, Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 50 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 | SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). | Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 75 Response at Week 16 | SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score. |
Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 75 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 | SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 90 Response at Week 16 | SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score. |
Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 90 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 | SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16 | The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all. |
Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a DLQI Score of "0" or "1" at Week 28 and Week 52 | The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all. |
Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16 | The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were < 16 years old at Baseline. |
Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CDLQI Score of "0" or "1" at Week 28 and Week 52 | The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were < 16 years old at Baseline. |
Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction in DLQI of = 4 Points From Baseline at Week 16 Among Those With a DLQI = 4 at Baseline | The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). |
Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction in DLQI of = 4 Points From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 Among Those With a DLQI = 4 at Baseline | The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 16 | The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 28 and Week 52 | The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS means and standard errors were calculated from an ANCOVA model with Baseline, treatment and stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories) in the model. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score at Week 16 | The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were < 16 years old at the Baseline visit. |
Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score at Week 28 and Week 52 | The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were < 16 years old at the Baseline visit. LS means were calculated from ANCOVA with Baseline and treatment in the model. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale at Week 16 | Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Change from Baseline was calculated from a rolling weekly average. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 28 and Week 52 | Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Change from Baseline was calculated from a rolling weekly average. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means and standard errors were calculated from an ANCOVA with Baseline, treatment and stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories) in the model. |
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction of = 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 28 and Week 52 | Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). | Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03563066 -
Effect of Benralizumab in Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02916888 -
A Study Comparing the Quality of Life of Patients in the Treatment of Eczema by Pediatric Generalists and Specialists
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01631617 -
Effects of Treatments on Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03720470 -
Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of PF-04965842 and Dupilumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis on Background Topical Therapy
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01012453 -
A Randomised Clinical Trial in a Population of Health Care Workers With Hand Eczema
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00375713 -
Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Xyzal® (Levocetirizine) vs Zyrtec® (Cetirizine) in Subjects With Dermatitis and Eczema
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00001150 -
Induction of Suction Blisters in Patients With Urticaria, Blistering Diseases, Inflammatory Dermatoses and Neoplastic Disorders, and in Normal Volunteers
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04154033 -
Treatment of Chronic Itch in Atopic Dermatitis With Topical Naltrexone
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05247333 -
Implementation of a Minor Ailment Service in Community Pharmacy Practice
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02979210 -
Infant Fecal Insult Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02615912 -
A Single-Center, Exploratory Study to Analyze the Dynamics of Skin Microflora Following Exposure to Surfactants
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01125761 -
Efficacy and Safety of the Association Drugs in Patients With Allergic Dermatitis
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00746382 -
A Placebo Controlled 4 Week Proof of Concept Study With 0.5% Roflumilast Cream in Patients With Mild Atopic Dermatitis (RO-2351-001-EM)
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00176956 -
Atopic Dermatitis-Like Skin Disease in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05001139 -
Clinical Investigation on the Efficacy and Safety of Relizema Ecofoam
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00801502 -
Salmon in Pregnancy Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00005781 -
Assessment of Digital Imaging as a Tool for Diagnosing Psoriasis, Hand Rashes and Unusual Moles
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05324618 -
Tacrolimus Versus Hydrocortisone in Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04826471 -
Clinical Investigation on the Performance and Safety of DermoRelizema Ecofoam
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06436183 -
A Study of the Effects of Camoteskimab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 |