Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03706040
Other study ID # M16-813
Secondary ID 2021-002203-34
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date December 27, 2018
Est. completion date April 26, 2021

Study information

Verified date October 2021
Source AbbVie
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and adolescents.


Description:

This study includes a screening period of up to 35 days, a 16-week double-blind treatment period (Period A), and a 36-week double-blind treatment period (Period B). Participants who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized at Baseline in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of 3 treatment groups: (1) risankizumab 150 mg, (2) risankizumab 300 mg, or (3) matching placebo. Randomization will be stratified by Baseline disease severity (Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis [vIGA-AD] score of moderate [3] versus severe [4]) and geographic region (Japan versus rest of world). At Week 16, participants in the placebo group will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either risankizumab 150 mg or 300 mg for the remainder of the study. Participants originally randomized to the risankizumab 150 mg or 300 mg arms will stay on their previously-assigned treatment through the end of the study.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 172
Est. completion date April 26, 2021
Est. primary completion date October 28, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 12 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - adults who are = 18 years old and, where locally permissible and approved, adolescent subjects who are at least 12 years old - a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) with onset of symptoms at least 2 years prior to Baseline and subject meets Hanifin and Rajka criteria - moderate to severe AD at the Baseline Visit - history of inadequate response to previous topical corticosteroid and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor treatments or a medical inability to receive these treatments Exclusion Criteria: - prior exposure to any biologic immunomodulatory agent or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor - concurrent treatment with systemic therapy for AD (biologic or non-biologic) or topical and/or phototherapy treatments

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Biological:
Placebo
subcutaneous (SC) injection
Risankizumab
subcutaneous (SC) injection

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Skin Health Institute Inc /ID# 204779 Carlton Victoria
Australia Fremantle Dermatology /ID# 204784 Fremantle Western Australia
Australia North Eastern Health Specialists /ID# 204785 Hectorville South Australia
Australia St George Hospital /ID# 204780 Kogarah New South Wales
Australia Woden Dermatology /ID# 204778 Phillip Australian Capital Territory
Australia Veracity Clinical Research /ID# 204786 Woolloongabba Queensland
Canada Beacon Dermatology Inc /ID# 213003 Calgary Alberta
Canada Kirk Barber Research, CA /ID# 201046 Calgary Alberta
Canada University of Alberta Hospital - Division of Hematology /ID# 213008 Edmonton Alberta
Canada Dr. Wei Jing Loo Medicine Prof /ID# 208849 London Ontario
Canada Lynderm Research Inc. /ID# 201050 Markham Ontario
Canada Dre Angelique Gagne-Henley M.D. inc. /ID# 208189 Saint-Jerome Quebec
Canada Medicor Research Inc /ID# 211274 Sudbury Ontario
Japan Hamamatsu University Hospital /ID# 203270 Hamamatsu-shi Shizuoka
Japan Teikyo University Hospital /ID# 202884 Itabashi-ku Tokyo
Japan Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital /ID# 213961 Kawasaki-shi Kanagawa
Japan Kurume University Hospital /ID# 203139 Kurume-shi Fukuoka
Japan Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital /ID# 214140 Nagaoka-shi Niigata
Japan Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Chubu Rosai Hospital /ID# 213667 Nagoya-shi Aichi
Japan University of the Ryukyus Hospital /ID# 203974 Nakagami-gun Okinawa
Japan Osaka City University Hospital /ID# 203410 Osaka-shi Osaka
Japan Tokyo Medical University Hospital /ID# 203647 Shinjuku-ku Tokyo
Japan Tokyo Medical University Hospital /ID# 204101 Shinjuku-ku Tokyo
Puerto Rico Dr. Samuel Sanchez PSC /ID# 213117 Caguas
Puerto Rico Cruz-Santana, Carolina, PR /ID# 213229 Carolina
Puerto Rico Clinical Research Puerto Rico /ID# 213118 San Juan
United States Cosmetic Dermatology of Orange County /ID# 205801 Anaheim California
United States Arlington Research Center, Inc /ID# 215899 Arlington Texas
United States MetroDerm ACC Research /ID# 205958 Atlanta Georgia
United States Oakland Hills Dermatology /ID# 217453 Auburn Hills Michigan
United States Tekton Research, Inc. /ID# 211558 Austin Texas
United States Duplicate_Great Lakes Research, Inc. /ID# 206447 Bay City Michigan
United States UAB Department of Dermatology /ID# 211561 Birmingham Alabama
United States Colorado Center for Dermatology, PLLC /ID# 216260 Centennial Colorado
United States Darst Dermatology /ID# 215100 Charlotte North Carolina
United States University Dermatology and Vein Clinic, LLC /ID# 210702 Darien Illinois
United States Dermatologic SurgiCenter /ID# 208972 Drexel Hill Pennsylvania
United States Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey /ID# 203203 East Windsor New Jersey
United States Center for Dermatology Clinical Research /ID# 204950 Fremont California
United States Rivergate Dermatology & Skin Care Center /ID# 203372 Goodlettsville Tennessee
United States Dermdox Dermatology Centers, PC /ID# 212259 Hazleton Pennsylvania
United States Center for Clinical Studies - Houston (Binz) /ID# 203383 Houston Texas
United States RI SkinDoc /ID# 203417 Johnston Rhode Island
United States Skin Care Physicians of Georgia /ID# 213188 Macon Georgia
United States Dermatologists of Southwest Ohio, Inc /ID# 215104 Mason Ohio
United States Tulane University /ID# 203214 New Orleans Louisiana
United States Virginia Dermatology & Skin Cancer Center /ID# 210154 Norfolk Virginia
United States Unity Clinical Research /ID# 217461 Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States Park Avenue Dermatology, PA /ID# 203378 Orange Park Florida
United States University of Pittsburgh MC /ID# 203296 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States The Indiana Clinical Trials Center /ID# 211618 Plainfield Indiana
United States Derm Assoc of Plymouth Meeting /ID# 208925 Plymouth Meeting Pennsylvania
United States Oregon Derm & Res. Ctr /ID# 202880 Portland Oregon
United States Health Concepts /ID# 203205 Rapid City South Dakota
United States Skin Cancer and Dermatology Institute (SCDI) /ID# 213041 Reno Nevada
United States Dominion Medical Associates /ID# 212986 Richmond Virginia
United States DermAssociates /ID# 206189 Rockville Maryland
United States Integrative Skin Science and Research /ID# 212486 Sacramento California
United States Cosmetic Laser Dermatology /ID# 210560 San Diego California
United States Therapeutics Clinical Research /ID# 203422 San Diego California
United States Cognitive Clinical Trials /ID# 208895 Scottsdale Arizona
United States Acclaim Dermatology /ID# 213026 Sugar Land Texas
United States The Vancouver Clinic, INC. PS /ID# 202930 Vancouver Washington
United States Grekin Skin Institute /ID# 210485 Warren Michigan
United States Omega Medical Research /ID# 216022 Warwick Rhode Island

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
AbbVie

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Canada,  Japan,  Puerto Rico, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percentage of Participants Achieving At Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at Week 16 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of "0" or "1" With a Reduction From Baseline of = 2 Points at Week 16 Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) was used to assess the severity of AD based on lesion appearance on the following scale:
0 - Clear: No signs of AD;
1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification;
2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting;
3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting;
4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting.
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction of = 4 Points in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16 Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 28 and Week 52 EASI is used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected and the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling), scratching, and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means were calculated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with Baseline, treatment and vIGA-AD categories in the model.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 75 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 50 Response at Week 16 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
EASI 50 response is defined as at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 50 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 50 response is defined as at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 90 Response at Week 16 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 90 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of "0" or "1" With a Reduction From Baseline of = 2 Points at Week 28 and Week 52 Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) was used to assess the severity of AD based on lesion appearance on the following scale:
0 - Clear: No signs of AD;
1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification;
2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting;
3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting;
4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Change From Baseline in Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis at Week 16 Body surface area (BSA) affected by atopic dermatitis was assessed by the physician and is expressed as a percentage of the total BSA. For purposes of the estimation, the total surface of the participant's palm plus five digits was assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Percentage of BSA Affected by Atopic Dermatitis at Weeks 28 and 52 Body surface area (BSA) affected by atopic dermatitis was assessed by the physician and is expressed as a percentage of the total BSA. For purposes of the estimation, the total surface of the participant's palm plus five digits was assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means and standard errors were calculated from ANCOVA with Baseline, treatment and stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories) in the model.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score (SCORAD 50) at Week 16 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 50 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 75 Response at Week 16 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score.
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 75 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 90 Response at Week 16 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score.
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 90 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a DLQI Score of "0" or "1" at Week 28 and Week 52 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16 The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were < 16 years old at Baseline.
Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CDLQI Score of "0" or "1" at Week 28 and Week 52 The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were < 16 years old at Baseline.
Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction in DLQI of = 4 Points From Baseline at Week 16 Among Those With a DLQI = 4 at Baseline The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
A change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction in DLQI of = 4 Points From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 Among Those With a DLQI = 4 at Baseline The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
A change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 16 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 28 and Week 52 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means and standard errors were calculated from an ANCOVA model with Baseline, treatment and stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories) in the model.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score at Week 16 The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were < 16 years old at the Baseline visit.
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score at Week 28 and Week 52 The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were < 16 years old at the Baseline visit.
LS means were calculated from ANCOVA with Baseline and treatment in the model.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale at Week 16 Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Change from Baseline was calculated from a rolling weekly average. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 28 and Week 52 Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Change from Baseline was calculated from a rolling weekly average. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means and standard errors were calculated from an ANCOVA with Baseline, treatment and stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories) in the model.
Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction of = 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 28 and Week 52 Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03563066 - Effect of Benralizumab in Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Completed NCT02916888 - A Study Comparing the Quality of Life of Patients in the Treatment of Eczema by Pediatric Generalists and Specialists N/A
Recruiting NCT01631617 - Effects of Treatments on Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Completed NCT03720470 - Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of PF-04965842 and Dupilumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis on Background Topical Therapy Phase 3
Recruiting NCT01012453 - A Randomised Clinical Trial in a Population of Health Care Workers With Hand Eczema N/A
Completed NCT00375713 - Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Xyzal® (Levocetirizine) vs Zyrtec® (Cetirizine) in Subjects With Dermatitis and Eczema Phase 3
Completed NCT00001150 - Induction of Suction Blisters in Patients With Urticaria, Blistering Diseases, Inflammatory Dermatoses and Neoplastic Disorders, and in Normal Volunteers N/A
Withdrawn NCT04154033 - Treatment of Chronic Itch in Atopic Dermatitis With Topical Naltrexone Phase 2
Completed NCT05247333 - Implementation of a Minor Ailment Service in Community Pharmacy Practice N/A
Completed NCT02979210 - Infant Fecal Insult Study N/A
Completed NCT02615912 - A Single-Center, Exploratory Study to Analyze the Dynamics of Skin Microflora Following Exposure to Surfactants N/A
Withdrawn NCT01125761 - Efficacy and Safety of the Association Drugs in Patients With Allergic Dermatitis Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT00746382 - A Placebo Controlled 4 Week Proof of Concept Study With 0.5% Roflumilast Cream in Patients With Mild Atopic Dermatitis (RO-2351-001-EM) Phase 2
Terminated NCT00176956 - Atopic Dermatitis-Like Skin Disease in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT05001139 - Clinical Investigation on the Efficacy and Safety of Relizema Ecofoam N/A
Completed NCT00801502 - Salmon in Pregnancy Study N/A
Completed NCT00005781 - Assessment of Digital Imaging as a Tool for Diagnosing Psoriasis, Hand Rashes and Unusual Moles N/A
Completed NCT05324618 - Tacrolimus Versus Hydrocortisone in Atopic Dermatitis Phase 4
Completed NCT04826471 - Clinical Investigation on the Performance and Safety of DermoRelizema Ecofoam N/A
Recruiting NCT06436183 - A Study of the Effects of Camoteskimab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2