Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04215250
Other study ID # IndonesiaUAnes 042
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 12, 2019
Est. completion date June 12, 2020

Study information

Verified date August 2020
Source Indonesia University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

compare the accuracy of CVC depth prediction in internal jugular veins: the difference between the andropoulos and ECG methods


Description:

seventy two subjects were given informed consent before the study started. compare the accuracy of CVC depth prediction in internal jugular veins with two difference methods, the andropoulos method and ECG method.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 72
Est. completion date June 12, 2020
Est. primary completion date June 12, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- signing informed consent form

- indicated for CVC insertion

- has no contraindication for right internal jugular vein CVC insertion

Exclusion Criteria:

- has history of arrhythmia

- has cardiac malformation history

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
andropulous method
Counts the CVC depth using specific equation
Device:
ECG
Using ECG to monitor the insertion of the CVC

Locations

Country Name City State
Indonesia Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital Jakarta DKI Jakarta

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Indonesia University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Indonesia, 

References & Publications (8)

Andropoulos DB, Bent ST, Skjonsby B, Stayer SA. The optimal length of insertion of central venous catheters for pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2001 Oct;93(4):883-6. — View Citation

Chaskar V, Karnik PP, Dave NM, Garasia M. Comparative Study of Three Methods for Depth of Central Venous Catheter Placement in Children: An Observational Pilot Study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2018 Apr;46(2):116-120. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2018.32748. Epub 2 — View Citation

Kremser J, Kleemann F, Reinhart K, Schummer W. Optimized method for correct left-sided central venous catheter placement under electrocardiographic guidance. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;107(4):567-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer189. Epub 2011 Jun 22. — View Citation

Kwon HJ, Jeong YI, Jun IG, Moon YJ, Lee YM. Evaluation of a central venous catheter tip placement for superior vena cava-subclavian central venous catheterization using a premeasured length: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jan;97(2):e960 — View Citation

Na HS, Kim JT, Kim HS, Bahk JH, Kim CS, Kim SD. Practical anatomic landmarks for determining the insertion depth of central venous catheter in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):820-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep078. Epub 2009 Apr 19. — View Citation

Sharma D, Singh VP, Malhotra MK, Gupta K. Optimum depth of central venous catheter - Comparision by pere's, landmark and endocavitory (atrial) ECG technique: A prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2013 May-Aug;7(2):216-20. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.118966. — View Citation

Struck MF, Schmidt T, Winkler BE, Reinhart K, Schummer W. Formulas for prediction of insertion depths of internal jugular vein catheters adjusted to body height categories. J Vasc Access. 2016 Mar-Apr;17(2):191-4. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000488. Epub 2015 Dec 7 — View Citation

Wang L, Liu ZS, Wang CA. Malposition of Central Venous Catheter: Presentation and Management. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jan 20;129(2):227-34. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.173525. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary CVC prediction depth using andropulous equation CVC will be inserted in certain depth according to the calculated depth 30 minutes
Secondary ECG change changes in p wave during CVC insertion 30 seconds