Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01831817
Other study ID # RH01591
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received April 11, 2013
Last updated March 23, 2015
Start date January 2013
Est. completion date May 2013

Study information

Verified date February 2015
Source GlaxoSmithKline
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this exploratory study is to compare the treatment effect on dentinal hypersensitivity of a tubule occluding dentifrice as measured by Schiff and Tactile sensitivity. This proof of concept study will compare the test dentifrice with three other treatment groups.


Description:

This will be a single center, eight week, randomized, controlled, examiner blind, four treatment arms, parallel design study in participants with at least two sensitive teeth that meet all the criteria at the Screening and Baseline visit. Participants will be assessed at baseline, four and eight weeks to monitor clinical efficacy and safety.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 140
Est. completion date May 2013
Est. primary completion date May 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 55 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Participants between 18 and 55 years of age, in good general health, with pre-existing self-reported and clinically diagnosed tooth sensitivity are required for entry into the study.

- Participants will be required to have at least four teeth with facial/cervical erosion, abrasion and/or gingival recession which respond to qualifying evaporative (air) assessment at the Screening visit and have at least two teeth (incisors, canines or pre-molars) demonstrating signs of sensitivity, measured by qualifying tactile threshold (Yeaple = 20 gram (g)) and evaporative (air) (Schiff Sensitivity Score = 2) assessments at the Baseline visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Specific Dentition Exclusions for Test teeth

1. Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay in 12 months of Screening.

2. Tooth with exposed dentin but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing etiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentin.

3. Sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator

- Use of a sensitivity dentifrice within 8 weeks of screening

- Individuals who require antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/ sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice
Calcium sodium phosphosilicate dentifrice (5% w/w) and 1500 ppm F as sodium monofluorophosphate
0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/ sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice
No calcium sodium phosphosilicate and 1500 ppm F as sodium monofluorophosphate
Sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice
Sodium monofluorophospate dentifrice (1000 ppm F)
Sodium Fluoride dentifrice
Dentifrice containing 1100ppm F as sodium fluoride

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Salus Research, Inc. Fort Wayne Indiana

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
GlaxoSmithKline

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4 Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant did not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responded to air stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus. Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment No
Primary Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8 Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant did not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responded to air stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus. Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment No
Primary Median Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4 Response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g. Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment No
Primary Median Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8 Response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g. Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment No
Primary Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4 The intensity of response to stimulus will be rated using a 10 point scale where 1 denotes "No Pain" and 10 denotes "Intense Pain". Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment No
Primary Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8 The intensity of response to stimulus will be rated using a 10 point scale where 1 denotes "No Pain" and 10 denotes "Intense Pain". Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment No
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4 DHEQ Total score is an overall summary measure for the impact of dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Total score is calculated as the sum of 34 questions (each with a possible score of 1 to 7). The scale of responses range from 34 to 238. Higher values imply a worse outcome i.e. an increase in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Lower values imply a better outcome i.e. a decrease in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment No
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8 DHEQ Total score is an overall summary measure for the impact of dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Total score is calculated as the sum of 34 questions (each with a possible score of 1 to 7). The scale of responses range from 34 to 238. Higher values imply a worse outcome i.e. an increase in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Lower values imply a better outcome i.e. a decrease in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT06244290 - Dentinal Hypersensitivity Reduction Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02466945 - Oral and Dental Tolerance and Efficacy on Dentinal Hypersensitivity of a Dental Gel, on Adults N/A
Completed NCT06166745 - Efficacy of Sensi-IP Toothpaste in the Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity Compared to a Sodium Fluoride Toothpaste N/A
Completed NCT02613117 - Research on Oral Tolerability and Product Application/Response of Two Oxalate Products for Dental Patients With Risk of Dentinal Hypersensitivity N/A
Recruiting NCT05852366 - Efficacy of Herbal Dentifrice for Management of Dentinal Hypersensitivity Phase 3
Completed NCT03405259 - A Clinical Study to Compare Professional Treatments for Dentinal Hypersensitivity N/A
Completed NCT02008500 - Comparison Of Clinical Efficacy Of A Herbal And A Non-Herbal Mouthwash On Dentinal Hypersensitivity Phase 2
Completed NCT04091256 - Treatment of Tooth Sensitivity With the Use of Biorepair Toothpaste N/A
Completed NCT01587950 - The Effects of Potassium Nitrate in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity Phase 1
Completed NCT03738514 - Comparison of Efficacy of 5% Fluorocalcium Phosphosilicate Dentifrice and Potassium Nitrate Dentifrice on Dentinal Hypersensitivity Phase 2
Completed NCT03741309 - Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of a Dentifrice Containing 5% Fluoro Calcium Phosphosilicate to a Dentifrice Containing Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate on Dentinal Hypersensitivity Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03553290 - Therapeutic Evaluation of Lower-level Laser for Treating Dentinal Hypersensitivity N/A