Dental Wear Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Hybrid Composite-nanoceramic on Material Characteristic and Clinical Use Over Tooth Wear Patients.
Evaluation of hybrid composite-nanoceramic on material characteristic and clinical use over tooth wear patients.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years to 100 Years |
Eligibility | 1. Tooth erosion/attrition/abrasion/abfraction patients 2. Age above 20 years old 3. Return at certain period during the trial 4. Full understanding of written and spoken language 5. Agree with the questionnaire |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Taiwan | National Taiwan University Hospital | Taipei | Test2 |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
National Taiwan University Hospital | Taipei Medical University Hospital |
Taiwan,
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010 — View Citation
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98--FDI World Dental — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Evaluation the change of hybrid composite-nanoceramic on material characteristic and clinical use over tooth wear patients. | Participants with worn dentition dentition (attrition, erosion, abrasion, abfraction) were enrolled in the present study. They were restored with hybrid composite-nanoceramic resin(Cerasmart, GC Corporation).
During the follow up time, participants were examined with clinical photos, radiographic film, intraoral scans, and asked to fill in questionnaires. The questionnaires included subjective questionnaire with VAS scale and objective questionnaire according to FDI criteria. The restorations were evaluated by two observers at baseline and after 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months according to the FDI criteria, which were categorized into three groups: esthetic parameters (four criteria), functional parameters (six criteria) and biological parameters (six criteria). Restorations were scored for clinical acceptability. Scores 4 and 5 were recorded as clinically unacceptable, and scores 5 was recorded for clinically failed. |
3months, 6months, 12months, 24months, 36months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02961049 -
Influences of Gingival Cord Retractor in Retention Rate of Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restorations.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04963530 -
Enamel Wear Evaluation in Patients With Different Ceramic Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03198520 -
REFRAME RPD Post-Market Clinical Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05843513 -
Tooth Wear Monitoring Using Intraoral Scanner
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03540264 -
Tooth Wear:m Tooth Wear : Diagnosis- Treatment Decision
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05431465 -
Wear of Vita Ambria Only Restoration Compared With IPS Emax Onlay Restoration
|
N/A |