Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04955860
Other study ID # 2020/44
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date March 20, 2020
Est. completion date July 1, 2021

Study information

Verified date July 2021
Source TC Erciyes University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to evaluate and compare the inclination of the lower and upper permanent first molars and the transversal width of the lower and upper jaws in individuals of different age groups to evaluate whether the existing anomaly at different ages in individuals with a bilateral posterior crossbite. For this reason, first molar tooth inclination and lower and upper jaw transversal width will be evaluated in adolescent and post-adolescent individuals with a bilateral posterior crossbite.


Description:

The maxillary dental arch covers the mandibular arch in every space like a box cover in normal occlusion. The transversal disappearance of this relationship is called a crossbite. If this deformity occurs between posterior group teeth, it is defined as a posterior crossbite. In other words, in posterior crossbite, while the teeth are in centric occlusion, the vestibule tubercles of the upper posterior teeth come into contact with the central fossa of the lower posterior teeth. This occlusal discrepancy may concern only one tooth, or it may involve multiple teeth or all teeth. A posterior crossbite can be observed unilaterally or bilaterally and is usually caused by insufficient width of the upper jaw compared to the lower jaw. Crossbite; stated that it is a term used for the abnormal buccal, labial, or lingual relations of the lower and upper jaw teeth or tooth groups when the lower and upper dental arches are in the closing state. Crossbite is divided into two groups as anterior and posterior crossbite according to the region in the mouth. Anterior crossbite indicates malocclusion of the jaws and/or dental arches in the sagittal direction, while posterior crossbite indicates malocclusion in the transversal direction. Posterior crossbite is defined as the contact of the buccal tubercles of the posterior maxillary teeth with the lingual tubercles of the opposite mandibular teeth. This anomaly can be seen unilaterally or bilaterally and may involve one or more teeth. In addition, although the canines were anterior teeth before, these teeth were included in the posterior region while expressing posterior crossbite. A posterior crossbite can be seen in the primary, mixed, and permanent dentition period. Posteroanterior (PA) cephalograms are the most readily available and reliable diagnostic tool for the radiological identification and evaluation of transversal irregularities. Traditionally, orthodontists have focused on two-dimensional lateral cephalograms; however, treatment is done in all three planes. A planar assessment of the transverse space cannot be made unless the PA cephalogram is analyzed. Typically, standard PA cephalograms were not used as part of routine diagnostic recordings. However, PA radiographs should be added as an additional recording material in individuals with a posterior crossbite. Digital radiographs and digital photographs are becoming the norm in orthodontic records. Recent developments also include electronic working models. Because the medical and dental anamnesis, digital photos, radiographs, and all treatment notes were in digital format have become desirable to obtain digital study models. Dental cast models have a long and proven history in orthodontics. It has become the "gold standard" in orthodontics with many advantages, from cast models that can be mounted on an articulator for a three-dimensional study, from routine dental examination to ease of manufacture, cheapness, and ease of measurement. Digital operating models offer advantages that include storage and reassessment, ease of cross-transmission, and possibly equal or better diagnostic capabilities. In addition, linear dental anatomical measurements were obtained from plaster and digital models, while Bolton analysis was performed on the cast and digital models. At the beginning of the treatment, dental plaster models obtained from the lower and upper jaw dimensions will be scanned with a three-dimensional model scanning device (3 Shape R700 3D Scanner, 3 Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). Scanned models will be analyzed with the 3Shape Orthoanalyzer program (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). A point will be placed on the distal, facial, mesial, and lingual surfaces of each tooth, from the right first permanent molar to the left first permanent molar in the same arch. These points will be chosen by the rules established by Moyers et al. and Brust and McNamara to determine the geometric center of each tooth, the tooth center. This point provides a broader arc width measurement because it will eliminate the effect of tooth rotation. After cast rotation, the first molars' facial and lingual cusp crests will be selected to assess molar tooth tilt and angulation. An inclination below 180 degrees indicates that the molars are inclined buccally, while values above 180 degrees indicate that these teeth are inclined lingually. Dental arch width measurements will be measured between the following teeth: permanent canines, first premolars, second premolars, and permanent first molars. Arch width will be evaluated with two sets of measurements: the distance from the lingual point of the selected tooth to the similar point on its antimere and between the centroid and antimer of a tooth. The arch depth shall be measured as the distance from the midpoint between the facial surfaces of the central incisors to the tangent line to the mesial surfaces of the first permanent molars. Arch circumference will be determined by summing the segments between the points of contact from the mesial surface of the first permanent molar to the mesial surface of the opposite first permanent molar.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 120
Est. completion date July 1, 2021
Est. primary completion date March 20, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 12 Years to 18 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - For the Working Group; 1. Absence of a syndrome or disease affecting the craniofacial and general systemic condition 2. Patients who have applied for treatment due to the need for orthodontic treatment 3. Adequate radiographic and three-dimensional dental model records before treatment 4. Bilateral posterior crossbite 5. Absence of anterior crossbite 6. Absence of loss of lower and upper first permanent molars and eruption of all 4 permanent molars - For the Control Group; 1. Absence of a syndrome or disease affecting the craniofacial and general systemic condition 2. Patients who have applied for treatment due to the need for orthodontic treatment 3. Adequate radiographic and three-dimensional dental model records before treatment 4. Absence of posterior and anterior crossbite 5. Absence of loss of lower and upper first permanent molars and eruption of all 4 permanent molars Exclusion Criteria: 1. Presence of a syndrome and disease affecting the craniofacial and general systemic condition 2. Absence of radiographic and dental model records 3. Losing any of the lower or upper permanent first molars 4. Presence of anterior crossbite

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Dental model analysis
No interventional treatment intervention will be made for individuals. Digital dental models taken for orthodontic recording will be examined.

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Erciyes University Kayseri

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
TC Erciyes University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (3)

da Silva Filho OG, Ferrari Júnior FM, Okada Ozawa T. Dental arch dimensions in Class II division 1 malocclusions with mandibular deficiency. Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):466-74. doi: 10.2319/022307-89.1. — View Citation

McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Herberger TA. Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions. Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):344-53. — View Citation

McNamara JA Jr. Early intervention in the transverse dimension: is it worth the effort? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Jun;121(6):572-4. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mandibular and maxillary first molar positions The inclinations of the lower and upper permanent first molars in the frontal plane will be evaluated. At the beginning of the examination, it will be evaluated as an average of 10 minutes for each patient's lower and upper jaw.
Primary Dimensions of the upper dental arch in the transverse direction The distances of the right and left permanent canines, first and second premolars, and permanent first molars transversely to each other in the upper jaw of each patient will be evaluated. In addition, dental arch perimeter and dental arch depth will be evaluated. At the beginning of the examination, it will be evaluated as an average of 15 minutes for each patient's maxilla.
Primary Dimensions of the lower dental arch in the transverse direction The distances of the right and left permanent canines, first and second premolars, and permanent first molars transversely to each other in the upper jaw of each patient will be evaluated. In addition, dental arch perimeter and dental arch depth will be evaluated. At the beginning of the examination, it will be evaluated as an average of 15 minutes for each patient's mandible.
Primary Evaluation of the transverse dimensions of the lower and upper jaws between different age groups The differences between the periods of different age groups (12-14 years, 14-16 years and 16-18 years) will also be evaluated separately for each group and parameter. At the beginning of the examination, it will be evaluated as an average of 25 minutes for each patient's mandible.
Secondary Evaluation of the transverse dimensions of the lower and upper jaws between the sexes Differences between male and female individuals will also be evaluated separately for each group and parameter. At the beginning of the examination, it will be evaluated as an average of 25 minutes for each patient's mandible.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04713280 - Maxillary Versus Bi-Maxillary Posterior Segments Intrusion Adult Subjects With Skeletal Open Bite N/A
Completed NCT04387578 - Evaluation of Efficiency for Three Different Aligning Archwires During Initial Orthodontic Leveling N/A
Completed NCT03991221 - Validation of Dental Malocclusion Schematic Representations for Early Orthodontic Treatment N/A
Completed NCT04381442 - Effect of Low Level Laser on Orthodontic Canine Retraction N/A
Completed NCT05614635 - Safety and Technical Performance of Plastalgin and Plastalgin Fast in Patients Requiring a Dental Impression
Recruiting NCT03714932 - Accuracy of Arch Analysis in Mixed Dentition Using Digital Models Versus Plaster Ones.
Completed NCT05094973 - Predictability of Distalization and Derotation of the Carriere Motion Appliance. N/A
Completed NCT05831722 - Changes in the Upper Airway Volume After Rapid Maxillary Expansion in Adults Using Pure Skeletal Anchorage
Active, not recruiting NCT05896618 - Evaluation of Dental and Skeletal Effect of TPA and Nance as a Space Maintainers in Children: A Prospective Clinical Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT04828096 - Retention With Three Different Bonded Retainers a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial With 5-year Follow-up N/A
Recruiting NCT06278116 - Comparison of Absorbance Values, Sensory Evaluations and Periodontal Effects of Five Different Products for Clean Aligners Cleansing N/A
Completed NCT04631419 - Effects of Flapless Laser Corticotomy in Canine Retraction N/A
Completed NCT04347018 - BRIUS Vs FFA Efficiency N/A
Recruiting NCT05615688 - Pain and Activity Levels After Orthodontic Separators N/A
Completed NCT04376164 - Laser in Orthodontic Leveling and Alignment N/A
Completed NCT04266769 - Precision Orthodontics: A Comparison of Custom vs Traditional Bracket Treatment Efficiency N/A
Completed NCT05151991 - A Clinical Trial on the Failure Rates of Metallic and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05144555 - Periodontal Parameters in Orthodontic Patients With Stainless Steel and Ceramic Brackets. N/A
Completed NCT05939102 - Eighteen-month Orthodontic Bracket Survival Rate With the Conventional Bonding Technique Versus RMGIC and V-prep N/A
Recruiting NCT05978856 - The Accuracy of Computer Software Prediction of Soft Tissue Profile for Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment