Dental Leakage Clinical Trial
Official title:
Adhesive Performance of Glass Ionomer Versus Resin Based Adhesive Systems
Verified date | December 2021 |
Source | Mansoura University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study aimed to clinically evaluate the 3-years clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin based adhesive systems in Class V restorations.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | October 30, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | September 10, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years to 35 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with primary caries involving cervical surface only with ICDAS 2 and 3. 2. Patients with normal and full occlusion. 3. Patients with tooth gives positive response to testing with an electric pulp tester. 4. Patients must have a good oral hygiene. 5. Patients with opposing teeth should be natural with no restorations. Exclusion Criteria: 1. High caries risk patients with extremely poor oral hygiene. 2. Patients involved in orthodontic treatment or periodontal surgery. 3. Patients with periodontally involved teeth (chronic periodontitis). 4. Patients with heavy bruxism habits and clenching. 5. Patients with abutments should be excluded. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Mansoura University | Mansoura |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Mansoura University |
Egypt,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage % of patients with marginal staining | Percentage of marginal staining in patients was clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restorations were given the score Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for clinically acceptable and Charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need for replacement. | 3 years after restoration procedure |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04848987 -
Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With a Self-adhesive, Self-etch or a Conventional Resin Cement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04679220 -
36-Months Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Room Temperature Resin Composite
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05383768 -
Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Repeated Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03542019 -
Survival of Endocrowns Made From Different Ceramics
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03886727 -
Effectiveness of Rubber Dam Isolation Versus Cotton Roll Isolation on Bonded Fissure Sealant Retention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06377423 -
Comparison Between Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases
|
N/A |