Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05218941
Other study ID # RC31/16/8764
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 2022
Est. completion date July 2024

Study information

Verified date August 2022
Source University Hospital, Toulouse
Contact Antoine GALIBOURG, MD
Phone 05 61 77 36 10
Email galibourg.a@chu-toulouse.fr
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The use of a passive robotic system allows the practitioner to widen the field of indications of flapless surgical access to the implant with an increased operative security and the possibility of an operative modification of the surgical protocol.


Description:

In recent decades, the placement of dental implants has become a common procedure for the rehabilitation of partially or completely edentulous patients. The placement of implants requires good visibility of the bone support to avoid accidents such as bone fenestration. This is why, except in very favourable cases where the bone crest is wide, unconcavated and with an ideal periodontal support, it was until then necessary to proceed with a flap before placing the implant. This invasive surgical protocol necessary for implant placement with good visual access has negative parameters such as : - detachment of the periosteum and therefore risk of bone resorption - longer intervention time - need for sutures - post-operative pain. On the other hand, flapless techniques, which respect the periosteum and periodontium, offer simpler surgical outcomes, reduced risk of bleeding and infection, less bone resorption, and overall better healing. However, the absence of an access flap to the implant site requires special anatomical conditions to avoid any risk of bone fenestration during drilling, and this technique is directly related to the operator's experience. Increasing the number of cases treated by flap-free implant surgery with increased safety is now possible thanks to computer-assisted surgery and passive robotics. The main objective is to compare the patient's post-operative pain outcomes between passive robotic implant surgery and conventional implant surgery.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 84
Est. completion date July 2024
Est. primary completion date January 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 21 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patient at least 21 years old - Favorable diagnosis of implant placement regardless of technique (ambivalence clause) - Radiological situation with sufficient bone volume but requiring a muco-gingival flap or the help of passive robotics. - Affiliated or beneficiary of a social security - Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Patient eligible for one or more implants and having a broad bone crest, with no marked concavity, and covered with a sufficient amount of keratinized attached gum. - Patient with limited oral opening - Patient with contraindications to implant placement (valve prostheses, unbalanced diabetes) - Photosensitive epileptic patient - Patient refusal to participate in the study - Pregnant or breastfeeding woman - Patients under guardianship or curatorship

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Implant surgery assisted by passive robotics
Implant surgery without flap assisted by passive robotics (X-Guide®)
Conventional implant surgery
Flap implant surgery

Locations

Country Name City State
France Toulouse University Hospital Toulouse

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Hospital, Toulouse

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain assessment Pain assessment according to a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10 24 hours
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05466006 - Peri-implant Soft Tissue Volume Changes at Small Buccal Dehiscences N/A
Withdrawn NCT00313989 - Evaluation of Osseo-integration After Placement of Dental Implants With Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Buccopharyngeal Oncology N/A
Completed NCT05081050 - Short Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region
Completed NCT04707677 - Comparative Aesthetic Analysis Between Titanium and Ceramic Implants N/A
Recruiting NCT05989061 - PEEK Versus Titanium Customized Healing Abutments N/A
Recruiting NCT05722041 - Soft Tissue Volume Changes in Posterior Socket Sealing Abutment.
Completed NCT05512845 - The Double Factor Technique: a Computer-guided Implant Surgery Technique for Fully Edentulous Patients
Recruiting NCT03837158 - Titanium Zirconium (TiZr) Mini Implants N/A
Completed NCT01944267 - Procedures for Improving the Mucosa Around Implants N/A
Completed NCT00971516 - Healing Profile of Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Patients With Diabetes N/A
Completed NCT04305080 - Effect of Anodic Oxidation of Implant Abutment Collar on the Peri-implant Soft Tissue Health N/A
Completed NCT06191510 - Xenogenic Bone Intentionally Left Exposed
Completed NCT04459494 - In the Treatment of Implants With Different Methods; Early Bone Loss and Patient Satisfaction N/A
Recruiting NCT05644470 - Association of Implant Position and Crown Contour With Tissue Health
Completed NCT05101954 - Platelet Rich Fibrin and Concentrated Growth Factors on Osseointegration of Immediate Implants N/A
Recruiting NCT05748379 - Atraumatic Zirconia Abutment Versus Customized Composite Healing Abutment in Maxilla or Mandible. N/A
Recruiting NCT05627037 - Marginal Bone Level Around Titanium Implants Produced by Additive Manufacture N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06187805 - Retrospective Case Series - OSSIX Volumax Collagen Xenograft Scaffolding
Recruiting NCT06100120 - A Triple-blinded Non-inferiority Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Hybrid and Fully Etched Implants P1 N/A
Recruiting NCT06155799 - Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System on Zygomatic Implant Placement N/A