To Compare Free Gingival Grafts and Connective Tissue Grafts Around Implants With Lack of Keratinized Mucosa

Dental Implants Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Free Gingival Grafts and Connective Tissue Grafts Around Implants With Lack of Keratinized Mucosa

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03338686
• Other study ID #: STS-15
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 7, 2016
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: August 2021
• Source: University of Alabama at Birmingham
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will compare two commonly used soft tissue grafting techniques (free gingival graft, FGG vs. connective tissue graft, CTG) to augment the soft tissue around dental implants with a lack of keratinized mucosa.

To investigators knowledge, these 2 types of grafts have not been compared for differences in clinical (amount of KM increase, tissue thickness increase and esthetics) and patient-centered outcomes (pain, swelling, change in daily activities) in a controlled study.

Description:

Research data and daily clinical observations reveal that implants with lack of surrounding keratinized mucosa KM (gingiva-like tissue that normally surrounds natural teeth) are more prone to persistent gingival inflammation, faster disease progression and compromised plaque control. Soft tissue grating (with FGG or CTG) aims at changing the nature of peri-implant soft tissue by creating or increasing the zone of keratinized mucosa (KM) surrounding implants in question. While FGG is typically associated with higher postoperative discomfort than CTG, it has also been considered the gold standard in the treatment of these clinical conditions.

Specific aims for this project include the evaluation of:

• KM width at 6 and 12 months following grafting with FGG and CTG

• Change in tissue thickness of the grafted sites at 6 and 12 months

• Esthetic outcomes using a newly developed peri-implant esthetic scale at 6 and 12 month

• Patient centered outcomes including pain, bleeding, swelling and change in daily activities at 1 week for both groups and at 1 month for the CTG group

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 14
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: October 9, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 99 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. English speaking

2. At least 18 years old

3. Must be a patient of the UAB Dental School, able to read and understand informed consent document

4. One or more adjacent dental implants having <2mm in width of keratinized mucosa or attached mucosa <1mm around their buccal aspect Contra-lateral or opposing implant sites with above criteria may be included and randomly assigned to soft tissue graft type

5. No crestal bone loss or minimal bone resorption not extending apical to first implant thread

6. Presence of periodontally healthy neighboring teeth, healthy implants or edentulous ridge on either side of the involved site (s)

7. Implants requiring soft tissue grafting after placement (>2 months): implants with healing abutments awaiting restoration or after delivery of temporary/permanent restoration

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Non-English speaking

2. Less than 18 years old

3. Smokers/tobacco users (>10 cigarettes/day)

4. Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing

5. Presence of peri-implantitis, acute infection and/or suppuration at the implant placement site (s)

6. Presence of soft tissue recession exposing threads at implant site

7. Presence of bony dehiscence at implant site (s)_ at time of surgery

8. Previous soft tissue grafting at the implant site (s)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Alveolar Mucosa
• Dental Implants

Intervention

Procedure:
• Free Gingival Graft (FGG)
Free Gingival Graft (FGG) was performed on all study sites in this arm.
• Connective Tissue Graft followed by Laser Gingivoplasty
Connective Tissue Graft followed by Laser Gingivoplasty one month later on all study sites in this arm.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry	Birmingham	Alabama

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The Increase in Keratinized Mucosa (in mm) Between the Two Grafts	Compare the increase in keratinized mucosa (KM) between two commonly used soft tissue grafting techniques (FGG and CTG) by quantifying KM widths (in mm) at 12 months following soft tissue grafting.	From baseline to 12 months
Secondary	Measure Changes in Tissue Thickness at 2mm From GM (in mm) Between FGG and CTG	Using a periodontal probe, soft tissue thickness will be measured (in mm) and compared between FGG and CTG following soft tissue grafting.	From baseline to 12 months
Secondary	Measure Changes in Tissue Thickness at 5mm From GM (in mm) Between FGG and CTG	Using a periodontal probe, soft tissue thickness will be measured (in mm) and compared between FGG and CTG following soft tissue grafting.	From baseline to 12 months