Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03211819
Other study ID # Prosthodontic Department
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 15, 2019
Est. completion date January 1, 2020

Study information

Verified date June 2020
Source Cairo University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Patients with fractured anterior teeth indicated for extraction will be recruited to the study. After Extraction of the tooth the socket will be evaluated and if eligible for immediate implant placement, implants will be placed either by free hand or computer guided technique. The pink esthetic score will be evaluated to be the primary outcome.


Description:

After diagnosis and history taking the patient will be informed about the sequences of the trial. If the patient wishes to participate and fulfills the clinical examination inclusion criteria, he/she will be sent to perform a Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) scan while biting on a cotton roll and placing cotton rolls in the vestibule to separate the teeth of interest from the opposing dentition and lips respectively.

Then the investigator will examine the CBCT to ensure the presence of sufficient labial bone. Only patients with sufficient labial bone (1.5-2 mm) will be included in the study. If the patient has less than 1.5 mm labial bone, he/she won't be eligible for immediate implant placement and would be referred to delayed implant placement.

The eligible patients will be recalled for impression making. The principal investigator will do a vacuum stent (2mm hard) on the obtained study cast for temporary crown fabrication after the surgery. The tooth or root to be extracted will be modified on the cast and an artificial tooth would be placed then the vacuum sheet will be pressed on the cast.

At this appointment (impression making) the patient will choose a sealed envelope containing the allocation either to the computer guided group (test group) or free hand group (control group). The patient's name will be written on the envelope to avoid changing the randomization process.

For the test group, the principal investigator (AK) will do virtual planning using Blue Sky ® implant planning software. Proper implant size and diameter will be used and a virtual surgical guide will be constructed in a Standard Triangulation Language (STL) format and exported to a 3D printing machine for printing. After printing the guide would be rechecked for adaptation on the study cast. A metallic sleeve will be placed and adapted to the surgical guide in the proposed implant site, using adhesive to avoid rotation during surgery.

Surgical procedure:

A prophylactic antibiotic would be given to the patient 3 days prior to the surgery. Then on the day of surgery, (AK) will extract the remaining root or tooth in an atraumatic procedure using lancet, periotome, minimal force and rotational movement.

After extraction the socket will be examined for intact labial and palatal bone using depth probe. If all walls are intact the socket would be eligible for immediate implant placement.

In the test group, the computer guided surgical guide will be used for implant drilling and placement following the manufacture's instructions.

While in the control group, after tooth or root extraction implants will be placed free hand guided by the extraction sockets.

Then in implants with primary stability > 35 Ncm2, the final abutment will be placed and any further adjustment would be done immediately in the lab and re-positioned in place. Then the vacuum stent will be checked in its place again intraorally, then a chair side tooth colored auto-polymerizing resin will be injected into the vacuum sheet corresponding to the implant site to construct the temporary crown.

Then occlusion will be checked in maximum intercuspation and lateral movement to avoid any contact with the opposing during the healing period. The patient will be instructed to avoid eating or incising any hard food in the surgical site for at least two weeks.

After a week the patient will be recalled for inspection and postoperative photos to be taken for outcome assessment for both groups. And finally after a period of 6 months the patient would receive a definitive crown.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 20
Est. completion date January 1, 2020
Est. primary completion date December 1, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with teeth or remaining roots indicated for extraction in the esthetic zone and eligible for immediate implant placement

- Sufficient bone labially (at least 1.5-2 mm) assessed after cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scan

- Presence of adequate mesio-distal length between the adjacent natural teeth (at least 7 mm), measured on the study cast

- No overeruption of the opposing teeth to avoid any premature contact with the temporary crown during the osseointegration period.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Presence of active sings or symptoms of acute infection in the tooth or the remaining root

- Heavy smokers (more than 2 packs per day)

- Parafunctional habits (clenching or bruxism) diagnosed by history taking and observation of the occlusal surface of the posterior teeth for wear facets

- Patients with poor oral hygiene

- Pregnant women

- Any systemic condition that may interfere with osseointegration (as uncontrolled diabetes, recent head and neck radiation)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
immediate implant placement
A prophylactic antibiotic(Flumox 500mg, Egyptian Int. Pharmaceutical Industries Co.,A.R.E.) would be given to the patient 3 days prior to the surgery. Then on the day of surgery, (AK) will extract the remaining root or tooth in an atraumatic procedure using lancet, periotome (Nordent Manufacturing Inc. U.S.A), minimal force and rotational movement. After extraction the socket will be examined for intact labial and palatal bone using depth probe. If all walls are intact the socket would be eligible for immediate implant placement.

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (1)

Arisan, V., Karabuda, C. Z., Mumcu, E. & Özdemir, T. Implant Positioning Errors in Freehand and Computer-Aided Placement Methods: A Single-Blind Clinical Comparative Study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 28, 190-204 (2013). 2. Khzam, N. et al. Systematic Review of Soft Tissue Alterations and Esthetic Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Placement and Restoration of Single Implants in the Anterior Maxilla. J. Periodontol. 86, 1321-30 (2015). 3. SCHROPP, L. & ISIDOR, F. Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction. J. Oral Rehabil. 35, 33-43 (2008). 4. Al-Sabbagh, M. & Kutkut, A. Immediate Implant Placement. Dent. Clin. North Am. 59, 73-95 (2015).

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pink Esthetic Score (PES) a scoring system of five points are to be checked and evaluated where 0=incomplete; 1= partially present; 2= completely present 1 week postoperative to surgery
Primary Pink Esthetic Score (PES) a scoring system of five points are to be checked and evaluated where 0=incomplete; 1= partially present; 2= completely present 1 week postoperative to definitive crown
Secondary Gingival recession yes/no 1 week and 6 month postoperatively
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Enrolling by invitation NCT05053958 - Using Superimposition of Intra-Oral Scan and CBCT in Single Implant Restorations in Aesthetic Zone. N/A
Recruiting NCT04367766 - Management of the Fresh Extraction Socket in the Aesthetic Area N/A
Recruiting NCT06296459 - Radiographic Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Following Closed Sinus Augmentation N/A
Recruiting NCT06247098 - Evaluation of Sinus Augmentation Bone Healing Using Autograft and Xenograft Compared to Xenograft Alone N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05988281 - Success of Implant Restorations After Immediate or Delayed Implant Placement With/Without Ridge Preservation N/A
Completed NCT04340830 - The Effect of Smoking on Dimensional Changes of Free Gingival Graft Around Dental Implants N/A
Completed NCT06404385 - Accuracy of Static Computer-assisted Implant Surgery in Distal Free-end Scenarios N/A
Recruiting NCT05405179 - Simultaneous Dental Implant in Free Vascularized Bone Flaps for Jaw Reconstruction N/A
Completed NCT06138392 - Long-term Study in Early Loaded Hydrophilic Surface Implants
Completed NCT04332679 - Non-resorbable Membranes Versus Titanium Meshes and Resorbable Membranes N/A
Completed NCT06127576 - Biomechanical Informational Effect of Innovative Double or Triple Dental Abutment-implant: Case-series
Recruiting NCT06059573 - The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Robotic System-assisted Surgery and Freehand Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT06068231 - A Study of Early Loading of Implants in the Maxillary Anterior Region With Alveolar Bone Defects N/A
Completed NCT03774888 - To Compare Different Soft Tissue Grafts at the Time of Lateral Ridge Augmentation Procedure. N/A
Completed NCT02864862 - Esthetic Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Combine With Soft Tissue Augmentation Phase 4
Completed NCT02444052 - Evaluation of Zimmer Puros® Allograft vs. Creos™ Allograft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation N/A
Completed NCT04861662 - Effect of Keratinized Mucosa on Peri-implant Health N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04541641 - Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique. N/A
Completed NCT03888339 - Influence of Abutment Shape on Peri-implant Marginal Bone Loss N/A
Recruiting NCT06231134 - Diode Laser 940 nm Versus Electrosurgical Device During Second Stage Implant Surgery on Bone and Soft Tissue Healing N/A