View clinical trials related to Dental Implant.
Filter by:Objective: To assess the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of early loaded implants with a hydrophilic, moderately rough surface for partially edentulous patients after a follow-up of 8.5 to 9.5 years. Materials and methods: A prospective observational single-centre study involving 15 patients with single, delayed placement and early loaded implants in the posterior area was performed. Clinical and radiographical parameters, including biological and technical complications and patient satisfaction, were assessed.
The purpose of this study is to present a guided lateral window sinus lift (GLSL) procedure with the aid of a fully digital workflow using surgical templates for window osteotomy preparation and implant placement.
Objective: The aim of this case series study is to present the rationality and scientific evidence of a new design for a Double and Triple abutment with their specific new concept of Biodynamic Optimized Peri-implant Tissue (BOPiT). Methods: The innovative design of these abutments with a paraboloid geometry was based on BOPiT, simultaneously involving the principles of mechanobiology, biotensegrity, and mechanotransduction. Thus, individuals rehabilitated with different extents of edentulous spaces using the innovative double and triple abutments on osseointegrated dental implants are included in this case series. The double and triple abutments support 2 or 3 dental crowns on a single implant, respectively. Clinic and radiographic examinations are presented at T1 (loading after 4 months of the implant insertion surgeries with the appropriate metalloceramic prostheses) and T2 [final examination with a follow-up time ≥ 3 to 12 years (average of 7.2 years)].
The aim of this study is to evaluate the transcrestal sinus lift using Osseodensification versus lateral window technique with simultaneous implant placement.
This study aims to characterise the stability of crestal bone levels one year after loading, the associated aesthetic outcomes, immunological response, prosthodontic outcomes as well as overall patient reported outcome measures for modSLA (SLActive, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) and NGA (TiUltraNP, Nobel Biocare AG, Switzerland) dental implants.
With the improvement of people's living standards, implant restoration has become an ideal method for partially and completely edentulous patients. Traditional classic implant theory suggests a 3-6 month undisturbed healing period is required before permanent loading can take place. However, this loading plan takes a long time and cannot timely meet the chewing function and aesthetic needs of patients with anterior maxillary tooth loss. Currently, with the continuous improvement of implant design and surface treatment techniques, the speed of implant-bone integration has been increasing, and early loading has gradually become a clinical option. After carefully reviewing the research conducted by domestic and international scholars on early loading of implants in the anterior maxillary region , we found that the cases included in the articles were patients with anterior maxillary tooth loss who did not require simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) surgery. It is well known that patients with anterior maxillary tooth loss often have significant alveolar bone defects. In such cases, GBR techniques are commonly used to repair the bone defect. However, due to the lack of relevant studies, the clinical loading strategies for implant cases with accompanying bone defects are relatively conservative. Clinically, a delayed loading restoration strategy is usually employed, which typically requires a delay of 6 months or even longer. However, delayed loading increases the patient's edentulous time, affects the function and stability of the dental arch, and increases the patient's psychological burden. Therefore, whether an early loading strategy can be used for implant cases with alveolar bone defects in the anterior maxillary region has become a key issue in clinical practice. However, there is few research reported on the timing and effectiveness of early loading of implants in the anterior maxillary region with accompanying alveolar bone defects. This study aims to evaluate the clinical effects of early loading in patients with anterior maxillary single-wall bone defects through a prospective clinical randomized controlled trial.
We plan to conduct this randomized clinical trial to compare the implant positional accuracy of robotic system-assisted implant surgery with that of conventional freehand implant surgery. Patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to either an experimental group that underwent robotic surgery or a control group that underwent freehand surgery, to evaluate the accuracy of implant in both groups.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the response of different bone densities to treatment with Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) in patients who need treatment with dental implant. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To investigate if bone reaction to PRF differ with different bone densities. - To study the effect of PRF on dental implant healing and to assess its effectiveness in accelerating osseointegration. Participants who need treatment with dental implant will be planned to include in this study and will be asked if they are willing to participate in this study voluntarily. All the participants will be given an information sheet and a consent form which provides simple description about the present study and its importance to insure voluntary participation. The patients will be aware that they are completely free to withdraw from the research any time during the research time. Platelet Rich Fibrin will be injected inside the hole that prepared to place dental implant in. Bone density will be evaluated, degree of osseointegration will be monitored.
The observed medical device in this study were SGS P7D Dental implant. The device replaces the lost tooth root, and provides support for the dental bridges and crowns, or overdenture replacements. This medical device provides the opportunity to to replace partial or complete missing teeth. Device material: Ti-6Al-4V Device surface protection: Corundum Blasting and 1. phosphate surface treatment or 2. hydroxylapatite surface treatment
The study aims to compare clinical, radiographic, patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and cost analysis outcomes in type I, II and socket preserved sites (III/IV) implant placement at 1-year post-loading in all groups.