View clinical trials related to Dental Implant.
Filter by:To compare biological, technical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of two types of monolithic zirconia crowns screw-retained to implant. To assess whether the new form of multilayered zirconia crowns will show similar survival and success rate to conventional monolithic Zirconia screw-retained to implants in molar and premolar regions. First Null Hypothesis: Multilayered monolithic zirconia crowns would have similar survival, success rate compared to conventional monolithic zirconia implant supported crowns. Second Null hypothesis: There would be no difference in clinical and patients related outcomes between multilayered and conventional monolithic zirconia implant supported crowns.
This study is designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographical outcome of tooth shell for alveolar ridge reconstruction in maxilla as an alternative to traditional autologous bone shell graft.
Technological advances have influenced the approach to implant treatment. One of the fields presently experiencing rapid development is static computer-assisted guided surgery (sCAIS), which allows transfer of the virtual implant planning to the mouth of the patient, based on the use of a surgical guide. In sCAIS there is a deviation between the virtually planned implant position and the actual position of the implant placed during surgery. A recent review analyzed only fully guided implants and recorded a mean coronal horizontal deviation (CHD) of 1.12 mm (standard deviation [SD] = 0.08), a mean apical horizontal deviation (AHD) of 1.41 mm (SD = 0.1), a mean vertical deviation (VD) of 0.12 mm (SD = 0.23), and a mean angular deviation (AD) of 3.58º (SD = 0.2). The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of CAD-CAM and conventional guides in candidates for distal free-end implant treatment, and to analyze the effects of possible confounding factors inherent to the patient or the surgical technique employed.A prospective, controlled and blinded quasi-experimental study was carried out involving 27 patients with 76 implants distributed into two groups according to the surgical guide manufacturing approach used: conventional (control group [CG]) or CAD-CAM (test group [TG]). The implants were planned virtually with the planning software, and the surgical guides were manufactured. Fully guided implant placement was carried out, and the deviations were measured along with other secondary variables as potential confounding factors.
Assessing whether is there a difference between computer-guided ridge splitting and conventional technique with simultaneous implant placement in patients with maxillary width deficiency.
A closed sinus augmentation is performed for dental implant placement.
The objective of this study will be to assess the efficacy of the peri-implant mucosal thickness enhancement following either subepithelial connective tissue grafts or Amnion Chorion Membrane placed simultaneously with dental implant placement.
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the tridimensional bone stability after horizontal one-stage GBR using collagene membrane (OssMem) with a mix of Bovine Bone Substitute (A-Oss) and autogenous bone (test group) versus A-Oss and LCR-A, a synthetic bone (control group).
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical and radiographic of immediately loaded, immediate (post-extractive, test group) versus delayed (control group) implants with new SOI surface
The aim of this prospective cohort study is to compare clinical and radiographic data of Osstem implants with SOI surface placed in patients with or without diabetes.
Conventional loading protocol following implant placement 3 -6 months is considered the gold standard. However, early loading following 2 months after implant placement decreases the time and had a good survival rate.