View clinical trials related to Dental Implant Failed.
Filter by:After a single-tooth extraction, physiological remodeling processes are unavoidable which leads to a total loss of the periodontal ligament and resorption of the bundle bone. Immediate implant placement associated with bone substitutes and customized healing abutments seems to reduce the amount of resorption at peri-implant areas. Recently, studies evaluating the use of a connective tissue grafts are being conducted in order to assess possible final outcome advantages in immediate implant procedures. This study aims to evaluate peri-implant tissue dimensional changes after the use of a customized healing abutment with or without connective tissue graft in flapless maxillary immediate implant placement.
Soldiers operate in environments that are more likely to lead to oral trauma, risking poor dentition which can directly impact military readiness. Dental restoration can often be accomplished via dental implant insertion. Microbiome-associated complications that result in bone loss, including the micro-leakage of bacterial species proliferating in the dental implant internal cavity, frequently lead to implant failure. Reduction in implant bacterial load may result in a shift of the composition of the microbiome in favor of less pathogenic species, potentially improving dental implant success rates, reducing surgical revisions, and associated cost savings. This study aims to determine how disinfectant gel (hydrogen peroxide or chlorhexidine) insertion into dental implant internal cavities affects implant failure rates, bacterial load and microbiome composition.
The aim of this study will be to compare the long-term outcomes of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants in patients previously treated for periodontitis and in periodontally healthy patients (PHP) after a follow-up of at least 20-years.
patients were randomly divided into Maxi-Z plus dental implant group versus Maxi-Z implant group
Regional oral and maxillofacial defects secondary to ablative tissue resection can contribute to severe aesthetic and functional loss, which influences patients' regular life and may cause psychological problems. Microvascular free flaps are considered the gold standard for reconstructing large oral and maxillofacial defects. In the past decade, with the help of computer-aided design (CAD)/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) customized implants and prosthesis (CIP) have led to a significant improvement of the operative accuracy, improve the flap survival rate and enhance the patients' quality of life. Concerning the increased overall survival rate of the patients, people pay more attention to the quality of life and aesthetic appearance which are influenced by the fitness and compatibility of the CIP. However, from literature reviews, the evaluation was various to be concluded in some certain conditions from pooled studies.
To assess the influence that the complications of implant treatment have on the patient's perception and satisfaction on treatment.
immediate implant placement using the VST was compared to early implant placement protocol using Buser's technique regarding implant survival, changes in labial plate thickness and soft tissue height after 1 year of implant placement
Implant placement in posterior maxilla is often compromised or impossible due to atrophy of the bone and pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus. Thus, alveolar ridge augmentation is frequently necessary. The most commonly used method to augment the maxillary region involves the maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with autogenous bone graft or bone substitute. Harvesting of autogenous bone graft is associated with risk of donor site morbidity and unpredictable resorption of the graft. Thus, bone substitutes alone or in combination with autogenous bone are used increasingly. Symbios xenograft granules is a new porcine bone mineral. Long-term studies have demonstrated that xenograft contains osteoconductive properties and is a safe grafting material. MSFA with xenograft alone or in combination with autogenous bone have shown high implant survival with new bone formation. In contrast, the maxillary sinus cavities possess significant potential for bone regeneration without the use of additional bone grafts or bone substitutes due to the principle of periosteal guided bone regeneration and surrounding bony walls. Bone regeneration after maxillary sinus membrane elevation with the use of coagulum as grafting material has shown high implant survival with new bone formation, as documented in reviews and short-term studies. The objective is to test the H0-hypothesis of no difference in the long-term implant outcome after MSFA with 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone graft and Symbios xenograft (control) compared with the coagulum (test). Forty consecutively healthy patients with a missing posterior maxillary tooth will be allocated to test or control. Implants will be inserted simultaneously with the MSFA. Clinical and/or radiographical evaluation using periapical radiographs and Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) will be performed preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, before abutment connection, after prosthetic rehabilitation, and one year after loading to assess the implant treatment outcome and the volumetric changes of the augmented area. The primary outcome will include survival of suprastructures, survival of implants, volumetric stability of the augmented area, peri-implant marginal bone level, oral health related quality of life, and complications related to the two treatment modalities.
Subjects who underwent a dental implant surgery were studied.Subjects randomly were aligned into three groups:In group 1, subjects received prophylactic antibiotic orally (Amoxicillin 2mg ,1 hour before surgery) and post-surgical antibiotic (Amoxicillin 500 mg , q8h for five days), subjects received only prophylactic antibiotic (Amoxicillin 2mg ,1 hour before surgery) in group 2 ,and in group 3, subjects received post-surgical antibiotic (Amoxicillin 500 mg , q8h for five days). The sign and symptom of infection were studied and the incidence of infection in each group was determined.
The study was designed as a retrospective, parallel, two years longitudinal pilot trial. Twenty-eight patients (mean age: 48.34 ± 6.06) aged between 35 and 60 years and 66 TiUnite surfaces (Nobel Biocare Parallel Conical Connection), bone level dental implant were included in the study. The implants were divided into two different groups according to the NPIs and regular platform implants(RPIs). The mean implant lengths, plaque index(PI), gingival index(GI), periodontal pocket depth(PD), gingival recession(GR), keratinized gingival width(KGW) and bleeding on probing(BOP) values were recorded. The Student's t-test used for between-group comparison.