Dental Extraction Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Etoricoxib Compared With Ibuprofen in Third Molar Extraction Pain.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of etoricoxib compared with a
well known and widely used non-steroid antinflammatory drug, ibuprofen, in third molar
extraction pain. At this time, there are no data about the efficacy of etoricoxib for
reducing pain following dental extraction.
This will be a single center, randomized, double-blind study, in which patients with
moderate to severe pain following third molar extraction will be randomized to receive
etoricoxib (120 mg in a single dose + 2 dose of placebo pro day for 3 days) or ibuprofen
(1800 mg in 3 doses pro day for 3 days). Paracetamol plus codeine will be used as rescue
medication. Pain assessment will be performed using a 11-point pain intensity scale (0 = no
pain and 10 = worster pain) during the first 3 days after dental extraction. Patients will
be enrolled 15 days before the dental extraction. During enrollment visit a complete
clinical evaluation with particular attention for potential exclusion criteria (e.g.
hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors) as well as blood analyses will be performed. A
follow-up visit will be performed 15 days after the dental extraction. Tolerability will be
assessed through recording of adverse events.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 110 |
Est. completion date | April 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2009 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - subjects with age > 18 years - in good health status (assessed in occasion of enrollment visit) without any major systemic illness - candidate to third molar extraction and presenting local pain within 2 hours after dental extraction Exclusion Criteria: - patients with any major systemic illness - patients with a clinical history of drug abuse - patients with hypertension and/or a condition of increased cardiovascular risk - pregnant or lactating women - patients with a history of hypersensitivity/allergy to analgesic drugs, including classical NSAID or coxibs - patients with either high levels of liver enzymes (major of 1.5x the upper limit of reference interval) or of creatinine(major of 1.2x the upper limit of reference interval) - patients with either a history of peptic ulcer or of haemorrhagic diathesis - patients who can not ensure an adequate compliance for the study |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universita di Verona |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | analgesic efficacy | 3 days | No | |
Secondary | side effects | 3 days | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04236115 -
Comparison of Articaine and Prilocaine for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02444052 -
Evaluation of Zimmer Puros® Allograft vs. Creos™ Allograft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06275789 -
Mix of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: a Possible Solution for Alveolar Ridge Preservation?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04915443 -
Periotome Versus Peizotome as an Aid of Atraumatic Extraction.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05400213 -
Wound Healing Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation Using DFDBA Alone in Particulate Fiber Form and in Combination With Xenograft
|
N/A |