Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05998980
Other study ID # 16-2.1/8
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 1, 2016
Est. completion date January 15, 2017

Study information

Verified date August 2023
Source Ege University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of composite veneers performed in two different ways, indirect and direct methods over a period of 6-year. 30 volunteer patients without systemic diseases and who applied to Ege University School of Dentistry for the esthetic restoration of their anterior diastema (gap) were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The closure of 102 diastema was randomly performed with prefabricated composite resin veneers (n=15; indirect method- Componeer, Coltène, Altstätten, Switzerland) or direct composite resin veneers (n=15; direct method- Essentia, GC, Japan). These restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, 1-2-6-year by two experienced and blind examiners according to modified Ryge criteria (USPHS criteria). Color match, marginal discoloration, anatomic form, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, surface roughness, retention, and polishing retention were evaluated for that purpose. Statistical analysis was performed with McNemar and Chi-square tests (p<0.05).


Description:

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of composite veneers performed in two different ways, indirect (Componeer) and direct methods (Essentia) over a period of 6-year. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Ege University, Izmir, Turkey (16-2.1/8; 01.04.2016). 30 patients without any systemic diseases (10 males, 20 females, mean age: 34) and with aesthetic complaints on their anterior teeth were treated with 102 restorations (48 Componeer and 54 Essentia). In Group 1; 48 teeth (15 patients) were restored with Componeer prefabricated veneers (Coltène, Altstätten, Switzerland) in combination with Synergy D6 nanohybrid resin composite (Coltène) and One Coat Bond (Coltène) adhesive system. In Group 2; 54 teeth (15 patients) were restored with Essentia (GC, Japan) micro-hybrid resin composite in combination with G-Premio Bond (GC) adhesive system. Periodontal treatments, fillings, and bleaching treatments were performed, if necessary, before any veneer treatment. For the pre-treatment records; 3 photographs (smile, anterior occlusion, and upper anterior teeth alone) were taken from each patient. Both groups used the "Button Try" technique for color selection. Componeer sizing guide was used for size selection in Group 1. Then teeth were cleaned with non-fluoride pumice (Cleanic; Kerr Dental, ABD) using a polishing brush. Isolation of the teeth and retraction of the lips were achieved with a rubber dam (OptraDam, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein). Prefabricated veneers were prepared for the cementation process in Group 1. Then the labial surfaces were etched using 36% phosphoric acid for 30 s. The etched surfaces were rinsed for 30 s and dried. One Coat Bond (Coltene) adhesive system was applied on the labial surfaces of the teeth in accordance with user instructions in both groups. In Group 1; Synergy D6 nano hybrid resin composite was placed on the inner surfaces of the prefabricated veneers before being applied on appropriate teeth. Then the restorations were light-cured for 40 s from each surface (D-Light Pro, GC) and polished with a polishing paste (Prisma Gloss Extra Fine, Dentsply, NY, ABD) and a felt wheel. In Group 2; Essentia (GC) micro-hybrid resin composite with dentin color was placed on the labial surfaces of the teeth and light-cured (D-Light Pro, GC). After that layer, Essentia enamel shades were placed over the labial surface of the tooth and light-cured for 20 s from each surface. The diamond bur contouring was performed and polishing discs (Super-Snap Rainbow Technique Kit, SHOFU) were used. For polishing purposes, a polishing paste (Prisma Gloss Extra Fine, Dentsply, NY, ABD) and a felt Wheel were used. In group 1; gingival borders were adapted with contouring and polishing discs (Super-Snap Rainbow Technique Kit, SHOFU). Then proximal surfaces were polished using proximal sandpaper strips. Occlusion was checked for premature contacts. Two calibrated observers who were blinded to the objective of this study performed the evaluations. Color match, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, anatomic form, retention, secondary caries, and gloss retention were the properties evaluated for the restorations at baseline, 1-2-6-year using Modified Ryge Criteria (USPHS Criteria). Statistical analysis was performed with McNemar and Chi-square tests (p<0.05).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 21
Est. completion date January 15, 2017
Est. primary completion date December 30, 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Being healthy without any chronic disease - Having diastema in the anterior teeth without any caries - Not having an occlusal anomaly such as bruxism or anterior crossbite - Having a good oral hygiene - Agreeing to come to the recall sessions regularly for 6 years - Being over the age of 18 Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion Criteria: - Having uncontrolled parafunction such as bruxism or anterior deep bite - Having insufficient oral hygiene - Being pregnant - Having a systemic disease

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Componeer prefabricated veneers
Individual Randomized Clinical Trial
Essentia resin composite veneers
Individual Randomized Clinical Trial

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Ege University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Izmir Bornova

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ege University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Marginal discoloration Marginal discoloration of prefabricated and resin composite veneers Evaluating differently veneer options on anterior teeth with United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal discoloration by 2 independent evaluators Marginal discolouration was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror at 18 inches was performed. A score means the higher score of clinical acceptability while C score means that the restoration has failed and needs to be replaced.
Alpha: No discoloration anywhere along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth. Bravo: Slight discoloration along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth.
Charlie: The discoloration penetrated along the margin of the restorative material in a pulpal direction.
6 years
Primary Marginal adaptation Marginal adaptation of prefabricated and resin composite veneers Evaluating differently veneer options on anterior teeth with United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal adaptation by 2 independent evaluators Marginal discolouration was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror at 18 inches was performed . A score means the higher score of clinical acceptability while C score means that the restoration has failed and needs to be replaced.
Alpha: No discoloration anywhere along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth. Bravo: Slight discoloration along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth.
Charlie: The discoloration penetrated along the margin of the restorative material in a pulpal direction.
6 years
Primary Retention rate Retention rates of prefabricated and resin composite veneers Evaluating differently veneer options on anterior teeth with United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rates by 2 independent evaluators Marginal discolouration was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror at 18 inches was performed . A score means the higher score of clinical acceptability while C score means that the restoration has failed and needs to be replaced.
Alpha: No discoloration anywhere along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth. Bravo: Slight discoloration along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth.
Charlie: The discoloration penetrated along the margin of the restorative material in a pulpal direction.
6 years
Primary Anatomic form Anatomic form of prefabricated and resin composite veneers Evaluating differently veneer options on anterior teeth with United State Public Health Service criteria regarding anatomic form by 2 independent evaluators Marginal discolouration was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror at 18 inches was performed. A score means the higher score of clinical acceptability while C score means that the restoration has failed and needs to be replaced.
Alpha: No discoloration anywhere along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth. Bravo: Slight discoloration along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth.
Charlie: The discoloration penetrated along the margin of the restorative material in a pulpal direction.
6 years
Primary Color match Color changes of prefabricated and resin composite veneers Health Service criteria regarding color changes by 2 independent evaluators Marginal discolouration was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror at 18 inches was performed . A score means the higher score of clinical acceptability while C score means that the restoration has failed and needs to be replaced.
Alpha: No discoloration anywhere along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth. Bravo: Slight discoloration along the margin between the restoration and the adjacent tooth.
Charlie: The discoloration penetrated along the margin of the restorative material in a pulpal direction
6 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04191200 - Oral Status of Patients Suffering From SCHIZophrenia Followed at Charles Perrens Hospital
Completed NCT02205619 - Amount of Cementum After Scaling, Root Planing and Glycine Air Polishing Phase 2/Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05597956 - Effectiveness of Infiltration With Resin in Treatment of MIH Incisors in Children Showing Opacities N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06081868 - RCT on Effectiveness of Oral Health Preventive Programmes in School Children in Uganda N/A
Recruiting NCT03851224 - Immediate Implant With no Graft , Autogenous Graft or Xenograft. N/A
Completed NCT04005456 - Personalized Lifestyle Intervention for Improving Functional Health Outcomes Using N-of-1 Tent-Umbrella-Bucket Design N/A
Completed NCT04153266 - Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Informational Needs Questionnaire
Enrolling by invitation NCT05157009 - Immediate Implant Outcomes With and Without Bone Augmentation N/A
Completed NCT03729167 - Instrumentation Effectiveness of Modified, Area-Specific Hand Scalers During Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy N/A
Completed NCT04492306 - Clinical Evaluation of Dimethyl Sulfoxide Dentin Pre-treatment N/A
Recruiting NCT04141215 - Allogeneic Bone Paste Versus Allogeneic Bone Powder N/A
Recruiting NCT06182462 - Virtual Reality Distraction for Dental Anxiety (RCT) N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04894201 - Deep Learning to Summarize Findings in Dental Panoramic Radiographs
Not yet recruiting NCT05371535 - A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of MatrixOssTM Bone Graft N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05022368 - Oral Device Clinical Trial Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT03103685 - Continue vs. Stop P2Y12 Inhibitor on Bleeding in Patient Receiving DAPT Undergoing Dental Procedure. Phase 4
Completed NCT05282212 - Point of Care, High Resolution and 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography
Completed NCT04686084 - Dual Energy Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (DE-CBCT) Assessment of Jaw Bone Density N/A
Completed NCT04657757 - Investigation of Bacterial Adhesion and Bactericide Effect ex Vivo on Different Implant Restoration Materials N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06252935 - Effectiveness and Safety of Collagen Membrane (FormaAid®) in the Treatment of Periodontal Regeneration N/A