Clinical Trials Logo

Dental Caries Class II clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Dental Caries Class II.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06265116 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Dental Caries Class II

One-Step Universal Adhesives: A 3-year Clinical Trial in Class II Composite Restorations

Start date: January 23, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

to evaluate and compare the clinical performance and periodontal responses of four commercially available one-step universal adhesives with different formulations in Class II composite restorations over a three-year period.

NCT ID: NCT06235489 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Dental Caries Class II

Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars

Start date: June 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

evaluate the clinical performance of EQUIA Forte ® ( a HVGIC) and Plafique® Bulk Flow composite resin when placed in class II cavities in primary molars.

NCT ID: NCT06000085 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Dental Caries Class II

Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars

Start date: December 30, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the present study is to assess Flowable Giomer Beautifil Flow Plus X (Shofu Dental Corporation, Japan) and Glass-hybrid-added HVGIC, Equia Forte (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in class II cavities of primary molars regarding the following objectives: The primary objective To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Flowable Giomer Beautifil Flow Plus X (Shofu Dental Corporation, Japan) and Glass-hybrid-added HVGIC, Equia Forte (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in restoring class II cavities of primary molars after 3,6, and 12 months. The secondary objective To assess the effect of different independent variables on the treatment outcome of the experimental restorative materials. Research question: Is there a difference in the clinical performance between flowable giomers and highly viscous glass ionomer in restoring class II cavities of primary molars? Null Hypothesis There is no difference in the clinical performance between Flowable Giomer Beautifil Flow Plus X (Shofu Dental Corporation, Japan) and Glass-hybrid-added HVGIC, Equia Forte (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) after one year of follow up.

NCT ID: NCT04538963 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Dental Caries in Children

Arrest of Proximal Caries Using Orthodontic Bands and Glass Ionomer Cement

Start date: September 3, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of using orthodontic bands with glass ionomer cement to arrest or reverse interproximal lesions as a preventive treatment compared to monitoring and oral hygiene. The investigators hypothesize that placing orthodontic bands with glass ionomer cement will arrest and possibly remineralize incipient carious lesions compared to teeth that are being monitored without intervention.

NCT ID: NCT03770286 Recruiting - Dental Caries Clinical Trials

Treatment of Interproximal Cavities on Primary Molar Teeth With Silver Diamine Fluoride

Start date: January 22, 2019
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study investigates whether 1) Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application using Super Floss can arrest and/or reverse initial interproximal caries on primary molars and 2) whether SDF applied with Super Floss is more effective in arresting or remineralizing initial interproximal lesion in comparison to SDF applied without Super Floss or fluoride varnish applied alone.

NCT ID: NCT03306602 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Dental Caries Class II

Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill vs Layered Composite Resin in Class I and II Posterior Restorations

Start date: January 30, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative in Class I and Class II restorations compared to the conventional incremental technique using Filtek Z350XT over the period of 2 years. The null hypothesis of this study is that the bulk-fill composite will exhibit same result and clinical performance as conventional composite using incremental technique which has been used widely by dentists nowadays.