Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03819036
Other study ID # APHP180366
Secondary ID 2018-A02692-53
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 18, 2019
Est. completion date July 30, 2020

Study information

Verified date February 2021
Source Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficiency of emergency procedures and patient satisfaction within the GHPS (Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière) Dental Emergency Department. Pain is the main reason of consultation at dental emergency. The investigators evaluate the pain felt before and after the intervention of the emergency with questionnaires at the day of the consultation (D0), then with phone interviews at D1, D3 and D7. The investigators also evaluate the quality of the reception and care provided in the GHPS service using a satisfaction questionnaire completed by the patients at D0.


Description:

I. Research progress Two investigators will take turns in the service for the research duration. They will be responsible for informing patients of the research upon their arrival in the service, for the data collection and telephone follow-ups. The course of the research will take place as follows: Day of consultation (D0): 1. Patient information on the research when he arrives in the service; explanation of its objectives, its modalities and constraints. 2. Verification of eligibility criteria. 3. Collection of the patient's non-opposition by the dentist during the consultation 4. Consultation according to the usual care. During this procedure, the practitioner performs a medical history and, according to the patient's answers, completes the "General Information Questionnaire". He carries out the emergency care and explains the postoperative consequences. 5. Patient filling in the satisfaction questionnaire immediately after consultation. Telephone follow-up (D1, D3, D7): 6. Telephone follow-up by the interviewer and fill in the questionnaire - in case of non-availability of the patient on day 1, the patient will be recalled on day 2 and the extrapolated data on the slope of the curve between D1 and D2 7. Telephone follow-up by the interviewer on the day and filling in the questionnaire - if the patient is not available on day 3, the patient will be recalled on day 4 and the data extrapolated according to the slope of the curve between D1 and D4; if the patient is not available at D4, he will be recalled to D5 and the extrapolated data between D1 and D5. 8. Telephone follow-up on the interviewer's day and fill in the questionnaire in case of non-availability of the patient on day 7, the patient will be recalled to D8 and the data extrapolated according to the slope of the curve between D3 and D8; if the patient is still not available on D8, he will be recalled to D9 and the extrapolated data between D3 and D9. II.STATISTICAL ASPECTS II.1. Statistical justification for the sample size 58,921 patients were received in emergency consultation day and night during the year 2017. A sample of 1% of the population concerned will be constituted. Patients received in day emergencies (44,191 patients in 2017) will be eligible. On average 121 patients are received daily in emergencies of day, about 600 per week (excluding weekend). According to a previous study in the department, 50% of patients in care could not be included in the study or were lost to follow-up. This leads to a number of 300 patients per week. The study will therefore be conduct over 2 weeks, to include 600 patients, ie 1.3% of the population consulting II.2. Description of statistical methods A descriptive analysis of the characteristics of the sample will be performed (age, sex, reason for consultation, diagnosis, prior appointment test, average score of anxiety and pain scores on D0, D1, D3, D7, compliance with instructions and making follow-up appointments,), satisfaction rating, appreciation of the quality of medical care, politeness of staff, waiting time, assessment of the quality of the care setting, the information received, the treatment received, and the recommendation of the service to third parties will be made. An analysis of the evolution of pain and anxiety scores between D0, D1, D3 and D7 will be performed. Correlations between the type of treatment and the perceived pain as well as the type of treatment and the perceived anxiety will be made. II.3. Method of taking into account missing or invalid data Patients unreachable during the telephone follow-up period will be contacted the next day; the pain and anxiety scores will then be extrapolated from the previous data and the new data collected, by calculating the nearest point on the curve connecting these two data. If they are new unreachable, the data will be considered missing. Data from patients with missing data will be analyzed separately.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 583
Est. completion date July 30, 2020
Est. primary completion date July 18, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age = 18 years - Patient reachable by telephone during the week following his / her care in the service - Collection of the non-opposition of the patient for his participation in research - Good understanding of the French language Exclusion Criteria: - Patient with communication difficulties or difficulties in understanding the French language

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Questionnaires
Day 0 : Satisfaction questionnaire immediately after consultation Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 : Telephone follow-up

Locations

Country Name City State
France Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpétrière Paris

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain scores evolution 24 hours after treatment The pain is measured by simple digital scale (ENS).
The patient notes his pain between 0 and 10.
0 being the lowest pain, 10 being the highest pain.
Day 1
Secondary Pain scores evolution 3 days ans 7 days after treatment The pain is measured by simple digital scale (ENS).
The patient notes his pain between 0 and 10.
0 being the lowest pain, 10 being the highest pain.
Day 3 and Day 7
Secondary Anxiety score evaluation bound to the care Anxiety is measured by simple digital scale (ENS) from 0 to 10. Day 0, Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7
Secondary Welcome quality evaluation from hospital staff The reception, cleanliness quality and waiting time will be measured by ENS scale from 0 to 10. The day of the emergency care (Day 0).
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05187507 - Effectiveness of Theobromine Toothpaste N/A
Completed NCT03453411 - Effects of EMONO in Children During Dental Care
Completed NCT04269759 - 145/5000 Oral State and Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Pregnant Women on Their Oral Health and That of Their Unborn Child
Completed NCT02904018 - Validation Study of Oral Teleconsultation N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05809817 - Oral Health Policy for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chile: A Microsimulation Model Based on Real-world Data
Completed NCT01733888 - Resin Infiltration and Resin Infiltration With Bleaching in Improving the Esthetics for Fluorosis Stains N/A
Completed NCT02904122 - Oral Teleconsultation N/A
Recruiting NCT04273035 - Handheld-multimedia Versus Oral Midazolam in Pediatric on Perioperative Anxiety Phase 4
Completed NCT04845633 - Effectiveness of Customized Handle Toothbrush N/A
Completed NCT05864027 - Oral Health Recovery Group N/A