View clinical trials related to Delayed Graft Function.
Filter by:This is a single-center, prospective, non-randomized, observational study to evaluate specific proteogenomic biomarker panels for acute rejection (AR) and chronic allograft nephropathy/interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (CAN/IFTA) in blood, urine and kidney tissue (biopsy) in kidney transplant recipients. Proteogenomic profiles will be routinely monitored over one year after enrollment.
Established markers of kidney function, such as creatinine, have considerable limitations in the diagnosis of delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation (KT). Indeed, creatinine does not accurately reflect minor changes of renal function as its levels change only upon significant fluctuations of the latter. CAF22 is a molecule which arises from the degradation of a larger protein and it is proposed to be a reliable and more sensitive marker of renal function. This study aims to further clarify this issue by measuring blood and urine concentrations of CAF22 and comparing them with creatinine levels before and after KT. The main assumption is that blood CAF22 levels could serve as a more sensitive kidney function biomarker than creatinine post-KT to detect DGF.
The primary purpose of this study is to measure the correlation between baseline expression of aging biomarkers, SenesceTest in blood of organ donor and renal graft function. This pilot study will study patients who are undergoing renal transplantation with organs from extended criteria donors, standard criteria donors or donation after cardiac death and compare ability of SenesceTest to predict renal graft function immediately after the transplant and at 1 year followup.
The main purpose of this study is to find out whether treatment to prevent kidney rejection with belatacept in presence of Thymoglobulin induction and withdrawal of steroids will result in less delayed graft function or "sleepy kidney" after transplant than that seen in patients who get tacrolimus as their main drug to prevent rejection instead of belatacept. The investigators will also look at whether patients who get belatacept have the same, lesser or more problems that those who get tacrolimus.
The purpose of this study was to determine if eculizumab is safe and could be used to prevent delayed graft function (DGF) following kidney transplantation.
The use of C1INH (Berinert) in patients receiving deceased donor kidney transplants with high risk for delayed graft function (DGF) may show significant improvement in outcomes post transplant compared with patients that do not receive C1INH treatment. Complement activation has been detected in animal models and human kidneys with ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) and inflammatory cell infiltrates. By blocking complement activation the investigators hope to improve kidney graft function post transplant in these recipients.
It is required to establish an adequate definition of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplantation. We attempt to compare various definitions of delayed graft function and find the definition that can predict graft function survival best in deceased donor kidney transplantation.
Compared to chronic dialysis, kidney transplantation provides recipients with longer survival and better quality of life at a lower cost. In order to meet increasing demands for kidney allografts, kidneys from older and sicker donors are being procured. This has led to greater discard rates of donated kidneys as well as more complications for recipients, including shorter allograft survival. Available clinical models to predict kidney allograft quality have poor prognostic ability and do not asses the degree of kidney allograft injury. However, allograft injury near the time of procurement can lead to major consequences for the transplant recipient: greater risks of delayed graft function, poor allograft function and premature loss of the transplant. Our proposal is based on the hypotheses that novel biomarkers measured in donor urine and transport media at the time of procurement can assess acute and chronic kidney injury and that distinct biomarker patterns will predict allograft survival. In collaboration with five organ procurement organizations, we will collect urine samples from consecutive deceased donors and samples of transport solution for every pumped kidney. We will measure markers of injury, repair, inflammation and fibrosis. We will determine mortality and allograft survival in all patients by linkage to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (Overall Cohort). Additionally, we will perform a detailed chart review of a subset of recipients (detailed cohort) and will also examine associations between biomarkers and longitudinal graft function over five years after transplant. Early, non-invasive and rapid assessment of donor kidney injury could drive better allocation decisions and potentially reduce the rates of post-transplant complications. Further, these new tools could provide a platform for clinical trials of therapies for allografts and kidney transplant recipients aimed at ameliorating allograft injury.
When a patient receives a kidney transplant particularly if the kidney is from an older donor or one who has had the kidney removed after their heart has stopped, there is a risk that the newly transplanted kidney may not function immediately. If the delay in function means that dialysis is needed in the first 7 days after the transplantation then this is known as delayed graft function or dDGF. Also delayed graft function that does not require dialysis but is present because the serum creatinine does not fall sufficiently is known as functional delayed graft function or fDGF. This problem is often due to an excessive inflammatory reaction to not having had a blood supply between the time of donation and transplant. OPN-305 is a monoclonal antibody that blocks Toll-like Receptor 2 which is thought to be partly responsible for increasing the risk of this inflammation. It is hoped that the effects of the inflammation will be reduced and therefore prevent dDGF and fDGF from occurring. The purpose of the study is to explore how effective OPN-305 is in preventing dDGF and fDGF as well as improving other measures of kidney function and the overall safety of the antibody. In the first part of the study, each patient received an Infusion of one of three possible doses of OPN-305 or a placebo and in the second part the most suitable dose of OPN-305 and a placebo would be used. The purpose of this second part of the study is to find out if a dose of OPN-305 which has already been tested in an earlier part of this study can prevent kidney graft dysfunction. For the purposes of this study, kidney function will be assessed using the composite of delayed graft function (dDGF) because dialysis is necessary in the first 7 days and functional delayed graft function that does not require dialysis but is present because the serum creatinine, a key measure of renal function, does not fall sufficiently (fDGF) in the first 7 days post-transplant. Protocol OPN305-103 follows out to 12 months post-transplant the clinical status and graft function of patients who have completed the 6-month post-transplant period under Part A or Part B of OPN305-102.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a single administration of QPI-1002 (also known as I5NP) can prevent DGF in patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplantation. In this Phase I /II study, patients who are undergoing renal transplantation with organs from DCD donors, ECD donors or SCD donors with ≥ 24 hours of cold ischemia time who meet study entry criteria will be studied to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of I5NP (Part A) and clinical activity of I5NP administration (Part B). Data from this study will be used to identify doses of I5NP to be used in follow-on efficacy studies. Part A will be a randomized, dose escalation study to determine the highest or maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Part A will enroll 40 patients at approximately 20 sites; patients will be randomized to receive either I5NP or placebo in a ratio of 8:2 in each cohort (cohorts 1-4). Part B will utilize the dose identified in Part A to further evaluate, in a double-blind manner, the safety, and clinical activity of I5NP. In Part B, up to 326 patients will participate at approximately 60 sites; up to 163 patients will be randomized to receive I5NP and up to 163 patients randomized to receive placebo.