Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02996292
Other study ID # UDDS-Ortho-03-2016
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 2016
Est. completion date July 19, 2018

Study information

Verified date July 2018
Source Damascus University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This experimental study will evaluate the effect of active and passive self-ligating brackets in treatment of crowding, compared with the control group of conventional brackets in class I malocclusion without extraction.

The study sample will consist of 66 patients with 3-6mm crowding. The sample will be allocated randomly into two experimental groups, in addition to a control group.

The brackets will be applied using indirect bonding method for all patients. The dentoalveolar changes occurring after leveling and alignment teeth will be assessed by using CBCT radiographs; pre and post- treatment changes for each group will be evaluated individually.


Description:

Producing of modern and various brackets systems both self- ligating and conventional make the 3 dimensional important in order to evaluate the root positions and to investigate EARR in multi root teeth, so the research will depend on CBCT to carry out these purposes in our study. Beside to compare the duration of alignment among groups.

Fixed appliances will be applied into three groups as 1. Active self ligating brackets (ASLB), 2. Passive self ligating brackets (PSLB), 3. Conventional brackets (CB) until reach to wire 19*25 S.S upper and lower. During leveling, thermal activated wires will be used in all patients.

CBCT images will be done before and after leveling and alignment of teeth to compare dentoalveolar changes between study groups.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date July 19, 2018
Est. primary completion date November 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 14 Years to 24 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- patients permanent dentition stage.

- crowding up to 6 mm

- Class I relationship.

- Good oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Poor oral hygiene.

- Previous orthodontic treatment.

- Patients with syndromes, clefts, or craniofacial abnormalities.

- Class II or III skeletal anteroposterior relationship.

- Crowding less than 3mm and more than 6mm.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Traditional brackets
Treating of crowding using traditional brackets
Active self-ligating brackets
Treating of crowding using active self-ligating brackets
Passive self-ligating brackets
Treating of crowding using passive self-ligating brackets

Locations

Country Name City State
Syrian Arab Republic Damascus University Damascus

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Damascus University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Syrian Arab Republic, 

References & Publications (7)

Badawi HM, Toogood RW, Carey JP, Heo G, Major PW. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 May;133(5):721-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.051. — View Citation

Chan EK, Darendeliler MA, Petocz P, Jones AS. A new method for volumetric measurement of orthodontically induced root resorption craters. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Apr;112(2):134-9. — View Citation

Chen SS, Greenlee GM, Kim JE, Smith CL, Huang GJ. Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):726.e1-726.e18; discussion 726-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.009. Review. — View Citation

Garcia-Figueroa MA, Raboud DW, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.034. — View Citation

Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024. — View Citation

Morina E, Eliades T, Pandis N, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Jun;30(3):233-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn005. — View Citation

Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire. Aust Orthod J. 2010 — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Speed of alignment Speed of alignment will be measured and compared between the groups. After 9 months
Secondary Changes of the torque and tipping of teeth The torque and tipping of teeth will be evaluated before and after treatment and compared between the groups using CBCT images. Evaluation before and after alignment and leveling teeth. (after 9 months)
Secondary Changes of widths and depths of the dental arches Changes of dental arches dimensions will be measured and compared between groups. Evaluation before and after alignment and leveling teeth. (after 9 months)
Secondary External apical root resorption External apical root resorption of each tooth on CBCT images (frequencies) after treatment. After 9 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04348526 - Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Between Two Methods of Leveling and Alignment N/A
Completed NCT03646942 - The Role of Low Level Laser Therapy in Acceleration of Teeth Alignment in Lingual Orthodontic Patients N/A
Completed NCT01402635 - Can the Point-Of-Care Chemistry Test (POCT) Solve the Emergency Department (ED) Crowding? N/A
Completed NCT03850951 - Comparison Between Lingual and Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances in the Treatment of Crowding Cases N/A
Completed NCT02415673 - Alignment Efficiency of Two Thermal Activated Orthodontic Archwire Sequences N/A
Completed NCT03645356 - Comparison Between Clear Aligners and Traditional Fixed Appliances in the Treatment of Four-premolar-extraction Cases N/A