Oral Budesonide vs. Oral Mesalazine in Active Crohn's Disease (CD)

Crohn's Disease Clinical Trial

Official title: Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Multicentre Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Budesonide (9 mg) and Oral Mesalazine (4.5 g) in Moderately Active Crohn's Disease Patients

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether mesalazine or budesonide is more active in the treatment of active Crohn's disease.

Clinical Trial Description

Crohn's disease is often treated with glucocorticoids or mesalazine. Both drugs are indicated for active Crohn's disease. Treatment with mesalazine is indicated for the treatment of mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease. Budesonide 9 mg/day or mesalazine 4.5 g/day are better than lower doses.

So far only one trial compares the efficacy and safety of budesonide and 5-ASA. The result of this trial is that budesonide is more effective in inducing remission than mesalazine. The primary objective of this trial is to confirm this result for other presentations of budesonide and mesalazine; i.e. Budenofalk® capsules (9 mg/day) and Salofalk® tablets (Eudragit-L-coated oral mesalazine; 4.5 g/day) in moderately active Crohn's disease. Mesalazine is used in this trial as a comparator. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Crohn Disease
• Crohn's Disease

• NCT number: NCT00300118
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• Start date: September 2004
• Completion date: May 2008