Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 8 (Co-primary Endpoint) |
Clinical remission is defined as a crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score of less than (<) 150 (in general, CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600; higher score indicates higher disease activities). CDAI will be assessed by collecting information on 8 different Crohn's disease-related variables: extra-intestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, total number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain [AP]/cramping, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, and general well-being. The last 4 variables are scored over 7 days by the participant on a diary card that participants are to complete on a daily basis. |
Week 8 |
|
Primary |
Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Response at Week 16 (Co-primary Endpoint) |
Endoscopic response is defined as at least 50 percent (%) improvement from baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) score or SES-CD score less than or equal to (<=) 2. The SES-CD score is based on the evaluation of 4 endoscopic components (presence/size of ulcers, percentage of mucosal surface covered by ulcers, the percentage of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing/strictures) across 5 ileocolonic segments. Each endoscopic component is scored from 0 to 3 for each segment, and a total score is derived from the sum of all the component scores (range, 0 [remission] to 56 [the most severe endoscopic activity]). |
Week 16 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 52 (Major Secondary Endpoint) |
Percentage of participants with clinical remission at Week 52 will be reported. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Patient-reported Outcome (PRO)-2 Remission at Week 8 (Major Secondary Endpoint: Co-endpoint) |
PRO-2 remission is defined as an AP mean daily score at or below 1 (AP<=1) and a stool frequency (SF) mean daily score at or below 3 (SF<=3), and no worsening of AP or SF from baseline. |
Week 8 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Remission at Week 16 (Major Secondary Endpoint: Co-endpoint) |
Endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD score of <= 2. The SES-CD score is based on the evaluation of 4 endoscopic components (presence/size of ulcers, percentage of mucosal surface covered by ulcers, the percentage of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing/strictures) across 5 ileocolonic segments. Each endoscopic component is scored from 0 to 3 for each segment, and a total score is derived from the sum of all the component scores (range, 0 [remission] to 56 [the most severe endoscopic activity]). |
Week 16 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Response at Week 52 |
Percentage of participants with endoscopic response at Week 52 will be reported. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 |
Percentage of participants with endoscopic remission at Week 52 will be reported. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 3 |
Percentage of participants with clinical remission at Week 3 will be reported. |
Week 3 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with PRO-2 Remission at Weeks 3 and 52 |
Percentage of participants with PRO-2 remission at Weeks 3 and 52 will be reported. |
Weeks 3 and 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Response at Weeks 3, 8, and 52 |
Clinical response is defined as a CDAI score decrease greater than or equal to (>=) 100 from baseline. Participants with a baseline CDAI score of >=220 to <=248 points are considered to be in clinical response if a CDAI score of <150 is attained. |
Weeks 3, 8, and 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 52 (in Participants Induced into Clinical Remission with Ustekinumab at Week 8) |
Percentage of participants with clinical remission at Week 52 (in participants induced into clinical remission with ustekinumab at Week 8) will be reported. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Corticosteroid-free Remission at Week 52 |
Corticosteroid-free remission is defined as a CDAI score <150 and not taking any corticosteroids for at least 30 days or 90 days prior to Week 52. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Change from Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration at Week 3, Week 8, and Week 52 |
Change from baseline in CRP concentration at Week 3, Week 8, and Week 52 will be reported. |
Baseline, Week 3, Week 8, and Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Normalization of CRP at Weeks 3, 8, and 52 |
Percentage of participants with normalization of CRP at Weeks 3, 8, and 52 with elevated CRP (>3.0 milligrams per liter [mg/L]) at baseline will be reported. |
Weeks 3, 8, and 52 |
|
Secondary |
Change from Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration at Week 8 and Week 52 |
Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin concentration at Week 8 and Week 52 will reported. Fecal Calprotectin will be monitored as an inflammatory biomarker measured by assay. |
Baseline, Week 8, and Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Normalization of Fecal Calprotectin at Weeks 8 and 52 |
Percentage of participants with normalization of fecal calprotectin at Weeks 8 and 52 with elevated fecal calprotectin (>250 milligrams per kilograms [mg/kg]) at baseline will be reported. |
Weeks 8 and 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Fistula Response at Weeks 8 and 52 |
Fistula response is defined as a >=50% reduction in the number of draining fistulas, among participants with 1 or more fistulas at baseline. |
Weeks 8 and 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission of Delayed Responders at Week 52 |
Percentage of participants with clinical remission of delayed responders at Week 52 will be reported. Delayed responders are participants who are not in clinical response to ustekinumab at Week 8 and achieve clinical response at Week 16. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with PRO-2 Remission of Delayed Responders at Week 52 |
Percentage of participants with PRO-2 remission of delayed responders at Week 52 will be reported. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Response of Delayed Responders at Week 52 |
Percentage of participants with clinical response of delayed responders at Week 52 will be reported. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Response of Delayed Responders at Week 52 |
Percentage of participants with endoscopic response of delayed responders at Week 52 will be reported. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Remission of Delayed Responders at Week 52 |
Percentage of participants with endoscopic remission of delayed responders at Week 52 will be reported. |
Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Change from Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 8 and Week 52 |
IBDQ is a validated, 32-item, self-reported questionnaire for participants with IBD to evaluate PROs across 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (loose stools, AP), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). Scores range from 32 to 224, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. |
Baseline, Week 8 and Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with IBDQ Response at Weeks 8 and 52 |
Percentage of participants with IBDQ response (>=16-point improvement from baseline) at Weeks 8 and 52 will be reported. |
Weeks 8 and 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with IBDQ Remission at Weeks 8 and 52 |
Percentage of participants with IBDQ remission (>170-point) at Weeks 8 and 52 will be reported. |
Weeks 8 and 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants Having any Crohn's Disease (CD)-related Emergency Room (ER)/Hospitalizations (Including Surgeries) Through Week 8 and Week 52 |
Percentage of participants having any CD-related ER/hospitalizations (including surgeries) through Week 8 and Week 52 will be reported. |
Weeks 8 and 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants Having any CD-related Surgery and Procedure Through Week 8 and Week 52 |
Percentage of participants having any CD-related surgery and procedure through Week 8 and Week 52 will be reported. |
Weeks 8 and 52 |
|
Secondary |
Change from Baseline in Each of 4 Impairments from Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire in Crohn's Disease (WPAI-CD) at Week 8 and Week 52 |
The WPAI-CD is a validated instrument created as a patient-reported quantitative assessment of the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributable to CD. The WPAI-CD consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work due to Crohn's disease, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours worked, the degree to which Crohn's disease affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which Crohn's disease affected activities outside of work. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. Each of the four scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicate greater impairment. |
Baseline, Week 8, and Week 52 |
|
Secondary |
Percentage of Participants with a 7-point Change from Baseline in Each of 4 Impairments from WPAI-CD at Week 8 and Week 52 |
The WPAI-CD is a validated instrument created as a patient-reported quantitative assessment of the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributable to CD. The WPAI-CD consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work due to Crohn's disease, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours worked, the degree to which Crohn's disease affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which Crohn's disease affected activities outside of work. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. Each of the four scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicate greater impairment. |
Baseline, Week 8, and Week 52 |
|