Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03060668 |
Other study ID # |
HSaoDomingos |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 2016 |
Est. completion date |
December 2018 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2017 |
Source |
Hospital Sao Domingos |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
In this prospective randomized controlled trial the investigators intend to compare the use
of a nutritional therapy based on caloric intake determined by indirect calorimetry and a
high protein intake (2.0 to 2.2 g/kg/day) with a nutritional regimen based on 25 Kcal/kg/day
and protein intake usually recommended to critically ill patients (1.4 to 1.5 grams/kg/day).
Description:
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effect of nutritional therapy with caloric intake determined by indirect
calorimetry and high protein intake (2.0 to 2.2 g/kg/day) compared to nutritional therapy
with 25 kcal/kg/day and 1.4 to 1, 5 g/kg/day of protein on short-term outcomes and physical
component (PCS) of quality of life after 3 and 6 months of randomization in severe ICU
patients.
The primary objective will be the evaluation of the physical component summary (PCS) of SF-36
(Short Form 36), a questionnaire used to evaluate quality of life, validated for the
Brazilian population. Patients will be assessed at least 3 and 6 months after randomization.
Secondary objectives: Measurement of handgrip strength measured on the 7th and 14th day of
the study and on discharge from the ICU, ICU mortality, hospital mortality, mechanical
ventilation time and length of stay in the ICU.
METHODS
The study will include patients over 18 years of age, not pregnant, submitted to mechanical
ventilation, whose expectation of stay in the ICU is greater than 3 days.
The sample size was calculated based on the following parameters: patient population under
mechanical ventilation, 528, 15% relative risk reduction in the evaluation parameter of the
SF-36 tool, Level of significance (α) of 5%, test power of 80%, thus the number of
individuals to be sampled will be 294, i.e., two groups of 147 patients. A computer-generated
list for randomization and sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes is used. The level
of significance to reject the null hypothesis will be 5%, that is, a value of p <0.05 will be
considered as statistically significant.
Informed consent was obtained from the patient or a next of kin.