Critical Illness Clinical Trial
Official title:
Follow-up After Intensive Care Treatment: a Questionnaire Survey of Intensive Care Aftercare in Denmark.
Verified date | November 2017 |
Source | Zealand University Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
This study aims to investigate current aftercare activities in Denmark after intensive care
unit (ICU) treatment. The hypothesis is that a large number of hospitals offer aftercare, and
these interventions are heterogenic and differ between hospitals and regions.
This study is an electronic questionnaire survey that aim to describe and map Danish
aftercare activities, and future development plans in this field.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 31 |
Est. completion date | January 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - All Intensive Care Units in Denmark treating adult patients. Exclusion Criteria: Intensive care units with a specialty field within these four groups: - Neurology and neurosurgery - Cardiothoracic surgery - Pediatrics or neonatology (PICU/NICU) - Postoperative care units |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Denmark | Zealand University Hospital | Køge |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Zealand University Hospital |
Denmark,
Broomhead LR, Brett SJ. Clinical review: Intensive care follow-up--what has it told us? Crit Care. 2002 Oct;6(5):411-7. Epub 2002 Aug 15. Review. — View Citation
Egerod I, Risom SS, Thomsen T, Storli SL, Eskerud RS, Holme AN, Samuelson KA. ICU-recovery in Scandinavia: a comparative study of intensive care follow-up in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013 Apr;29(2):103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.10.005. Epub 2013 Jan 20. — View Citation
Engström A, Andersson S, Söderberg S. Re-visiting the ICU Experiences of follow-up visits to an ICU after discharge: a qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008 Aug;24(4):233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 22. — View Citation
Häggström M, Asplund K, Kristiansen L. How can nurses facilitate patient's transitions from intensive care?: a grounded theory of nursing. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2012 Aug;28(4):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Mar 3. — View Citation
Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Barr A, Cook D, Slutsky AS; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):683-93. — View Citation
Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matté A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Kudlow P, Cook D, Slutsky AS, Cheung AM; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802. — View Citation
Jensen JF, Thomsen T, Overgaard D, Bestle MH, Christensen D, Egerod I. Impact of follow-up consultations for ICU survivors on post-ICU syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2015 May;41(5):763-75. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3689-1. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Review. Erratum in: Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jul;41(7):1391. — View Citation
Mehlhorn J, Freytag A, Schmidt K, Brunkhorst FM, Graf J, Troitzsch U, Schlattmann P, Wensing M, Gensichen J. Rehabilitation interventions for postintensive care syndrome: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1263-71. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000148. Review. — View Citation
Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, Zawistowski C, Bemis-Dougherty A, Berney SC, Bienvenu OJ, Brady SL, Brodsky MB, Denehy L, Elliott D, Flatley C, Harabin AL, Jones C, Louis D, Meltzer W, Muldoon SR, Palmer JB, Perme C, Robinson M, Schmidt DM, Scruth E, Spill GR, Storey CP, Render M, Votto J, Harvey MA. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75. Review. — View Citation
Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, Morandi A, Thompson JL, Pun BT, Brummel NE, Hughes CG, Vasilevskis EE, Shintani AK, Moons KG, Geevarghese SK, Canonico A, Hopkins RO, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, Ely EW; BRAIN-ICU Study Investigators. Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1306-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301372. — View Citation
Van Der Schaaf M, Bakhshi-Raiez F, Van Der Steen M, Dongelmans DA, De Keizer NF. Recommendations for intensive care follow-up clinics; report from a survey and conference of Dutch intensive cares. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Feb;81(2):135-44. Epub 2014 May 14. — View Citation
Wolters A, Bouw M, Vogelaar J, Tjan D, van Zanten A, van der Steen M. The postintensive care syndrome of survivors of critical illness and their families. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Mar;24(5-6):876-9. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12678. Epub 2014 Dec 1. — View Citation
* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Incidence of ICUs offering early aftercare to patients after discharge from ICU | The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no' | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Primary | Incidence of ICUs offering late aftercare to patients after discharge from hospital | The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no' | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Size of hospital (number of beds) | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | ||
Secondary | Size of ICU (number of beds) | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | ||
Secondary | Early aftercare: Use of protocol or checklist at patient visit | The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no' | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Late aftercare: Use of protocol or checklist at patient visit | The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no' | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Early aftercare: Selection of patients offered aftercare | The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Late aftercare: Selection of patients offered aftercare | The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Early aftercare: Time from ICU-discharge to first contact | The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many hours to days until the patient is contacted at the general wards | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Late aftercare: Time from hospital discharge to first contact | The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many months from discharge, until the patient is contacted | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Early aftercare: Aftercare team members | The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Early aftercare: Consumption of time | The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Late aftercare: Aftercare team members | The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Late aftercare: Consumption of time | The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Early aftercare: Type of aftercare interventions during general ward stay | The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Late aftercare: Type of aftercare interventions after hospital discharge | The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Early aftercare: Type of screening tools or other methods used for patient assessment | The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Late aftercare: Type of screening tools or other methods used for patient assessment | The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Late aftercare: Contact method | The respondent will choose from a list of options: How the ICU contacts the patient after hospital discharge. By phone, by letter, by mail, by digital inbox | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Late aftercare: Participation of family members | The respondent will choose from a list: Whether the family is invited to participate in the consultation with the patient or not. Yes/No | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Classifications of reasons for not having an aftercare programme at ICUs without an aftercare programme | The respondent will choose from a list of options: Not enough money, resistance from the general wards, not an important subject, and also be able to write their own answer. | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | The responsible party for the financing of aftercare | The respondent will choose from a list of options: The ICU itself, the general ward, the region or through funds? | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | The respondent's own assessment of how aftercare will be prioritized at their ICU in one year. | The respondent will choose on a scale: More aftercare? Same level of aftercare? Less aftercare? | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 | |
Secondary | Should aftercare be offered? | The respondent will choose on a scale: Totally agree, partially agree, neither agree or disagree, partially disagree, totally disagree | From May 15th to September 31st 2016 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04551508 -
Delirium Screening 3 Methods Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06037928 -
Plasma Sodium and Sodium Administration in the ICU
|
||
Completed |
NCT03671447 -
Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care (ERIC)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03941002 -
Continuous Evaluation of Diaphragm Function
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04674657 -
Does Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Alter Antiinfectives Therapy Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT04239209 -
Effect of Intensivist Communication on Surrogate Prognosis Interpretation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05531305 -
Longitudinal Changes in Muscle Mass After Intensive Care
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03335124 -
The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02916004 -
The Use of Nociception Flexion Reflex and Pupillary Dilatation Reflex in ICU Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05883137 -
High-flow Nasal Oxygenation for Apnoeic Oxygenation During Intubation of the Critically Ill
|
||
Completed |
NCT04479254 -
The Impact of IC-Guided Feeding Protocol on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients (The IC-Study)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04475666 -
Replacing Protein Via Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04516395 -
Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Infection Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04538469 -
Absent Visitors: The Wider Implications of COVID-19 on Non-COVID Cardiothoracic ICU Patients, Relatives and Staff
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04043091 -
Coronary Angiography in Critically Ill Patients With Type II Myocardial Infarction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02922998 -
CD64 and Antibiotics in Human Sepsis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02989051 -
Fluid Restriction Keeps Children Dry
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03048487 -
Protein Consumption in Critically Ill Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT02899208 -
Can an Actigraph be Used to Predict Physical Function in Intensive Care Patients?
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02163109 -
Oxygen Consumption in Critical Illness
|