Intestinal-Specific Organ Function Assessment (iSOFA Study)

Critical Illness Clinical Trial

— iSOFA  

Official title:

Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study on Prognostic Value of Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Intestinal-specific Biomarkers in Prediction of Outcome of Intensive Care Patients

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02613000
• Other study ID #: iSOFA Study
• Status: Completed
• Start date: April 2015
• Est. completion date: July 2018

Study information

• Verified date: April 2019
• Source: University of Tartu
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Importance of gastrointestinal (GI) function in critically ill patients has been recognized, but until now there is no validated clinical tool to monitor GI dysfunction as part of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The general aim of current project is to develop a five grade score (0-4 points) for assessment of GI function similar to SOFA sub-scores used for assessment of other organ systems. 500 consecutive adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit will be monitored for gastrointestinal symptoms, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grades [1]. In 200 patients from these, plasma and urinary levels of possible biochemical markers of intestinal injury will be assessed.

Objectives:

• To determine the prognostic value of gastrointestinal symptoms alone and in combination with intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and acute gastro-intestinal injury (AGI) grades in predicting the ICU-, 28 days and 90 days mortality of adult intensive care patients (Part A of the study)

• To describe the blood and urine levels of biochemical markers of intestinal injury in general cohort of intensive care patients (Part B of the study).

• To compare the prognostic values of the intestinal-specific plasma parameters (IFABP, citrulline, ILBP, and D-lactate) with the gastrointestinal symptoms, AGI grades, and the SOFA score in predicting of ICU-, 28 days and 90 days mortality of adult intensive care patients (Part B of the study) Study design: prospective, observational, multicenter study Patient population: All consecutive adult critically ill patients (25 to 50 patients for each study site, 500 patients in total) in need for intensive care admission during maximum 4 weeks of study period.

Duration of the study: for the individual patient 7 days and follow-up of 90 days Primary study outcome: 28 and 90 days all-cause mortality Secondary outcomes: ICU and hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, multiple organ failure as a cause of mortality, plasma and urinary levels of intestinal fatty-acid binding protein (I-FABP), citrulline, ileal lipid binding protein (ILBP), and D-lactate in general cohort of intensive care patients.

Description:

Objectives

1. To determine the prognostic value of gastrointestinal symptoms alone and in combination with intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and acute gastro-intestinal injury (AGI) grades in predicting the ICU-, 28 days and 90 days mortality of adult intensive care patients.

2. To describe the blood and urine levels of the intestinal-specific plasma parameters (I-FABP, citrulline, ILBP, and D-lactate) in general cohort of intensive care patients.

3. To compare the prognostic values of the intestinal-specific plasma parameters (I-FABP, citrulline, ILBP, and D-lactate) with the gastrointestinal symptoms, AGI grades, and the SOFA score in predicting of ICU-, 28 days and 90 days mortality of adult intensive care patients.

Hypothesis

1. GI symptoms, alone or in combination with IAP, and AGI grades as defined by WGAP statement improve the predictive capability of the SOFA score in critically ill patients.

2. Intestinal-specific plasma and urinary markers are good to excellent predictors of outcome in critically ill patients.

3. Best prediction is achieved by combination of GI symptoms, IAP and plasma markers.

4. A clinical score developed based on the data from this study can be combined with existing SOFA score and thereby the predictive value of the SOFA score will be improved.

To test these hypotheses, the study has two parts:

Part A. Clinical data and routine laboratory parameters of 500 consecutive patients will be collected for 7 days after ICU admission. Standard treatment is implemented; no additional interventions solely for the study will be performed. Waived consent is expected.

Part B. Blood and urinary samples for intestinal-specific laboratory markers will be drawn once daily from 200 patients enrolled in Part A, and analyzed in addition to standard clinical and laboratory data. First blood sample will be taken at admission to the intensive care unit. Informed consent will therefore be obtained from the patient or the next of kin after blood and urine sampling (delayed consent).

Research questions Part A.

1. What is the predictive capability of gastrointestinal symptoms, IAP and AGI grades in intensive care patients?

2. Does the use of the AGI grades or a new AGI score based on GI symptoms alone or in combination with IAP improve the predictive capability of the SOFA score in the intensive care patients? Part B.

3. What is the relationship between the intestinal-specific markers and the disease severity of the organ dysfunction, as described with the APACHE and the SOFA score?

4. What is the predictive value of the intestinal-specific markers in predicting ICU-, 28 days and 90 days all-cause mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation?

5. Is there a correlation between the intestinal-specific markers and the gastrointestinal signs and symptoms?

6. Is the predictive value of the intestinal specific markers higher compared to the GI symptoms, IAP and AGI grades in predicting ICU-, 28 days and 90 days all-cause mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation?

7. Does the addition of the intestinal-specific plasma and urinary markers increase the predictive value of the SOFA score in predicting outcome?

8. Is the combination of the intestinal-specific markers with the GI symptoms, IAP and AGI grades better in predicting outcome compared to two individual items?

9. What in these comparisons is the best marker or combination of markers?

Methods/design

1. Study design, setting and patient population This is a prospective multicenter cohort study where 500 consecutive adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit will be monitored for gastrointestinal symptoms, IAP and AGI grades. Of these 500 patients, 200 patients will be included in part B.

All consecutive adult critically ill patients (25 to 50 patients for each study site) in need for intensive care admission during maximum 6 weeks.

The study will consist of three phases:

1. Screening assessment, documentation of admission parameters;

2. Study period of 7 days for the individual patient;

3. Follow-up period of 90 days.

2. Study sites and the duration of the study The study will be conducted in ICUs of both university teaching hospitals and general (non-academic) hospitals. 20 ICUs from different countries will be invited and expected to participate, and each site is expected to enrol 25 to 50 patients during the maximum period of 6 weeks.

For individual patient the study period is 7 days or till ICU discharge and follow-up of 90 days.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 544
• Est. completion date: July 2018
• Est. primary completion date: July 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Part A Inclusion criteria

• Admission to ICU during the study period (the patients already in the ICU at the time the study starts will not be included)

• Age at least 18 years Exclusion criteria

• Age <18 years

• Restriction of care at admission (i.e any limitation of intensive care measures)

• Readmission 7 or more days after initial admission to ICU

Part B Inclusion criteria

• Admission to ICU during the study period (the patients already in the ICU at the time the study starts will not be included)

• Age at least 18 years

• Signed informed consent by patient or next of kin or legal representative for blood sampling.

Exclusion criteria

• Age <18 years

• Restriction of care at admission (i.e any limitation of intensive care measures)

• Readmission 7 or more days after initial admission to ICU

• Absence of signed informed consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Critical Illness
• Multiple Organ Failure

Intervention

Other:
• No intervention

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Estonia	Tartu University Hospital	Tartu

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Tartu	Karolinska University Hospital, University Hospital Inselspital, Berne, Vienna General Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Estonia, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	all-cause mortality		90 days