Registration Enabling Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of the Navigator Circulatory Management System

Critical Illness Clinical Trial

— NAV-1  

Official title:

A Prospective,Open,Multicentre,RCT to Assess the Safety & Efficacy of Navigator v Conventional Care in Post-op Cardiac Surgery Patients Undergoing CABG &/or Heart Valve Repair/Replacement Utilising Heart Lung Perfusion Pump(The NAV-1 Study)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00468247
• Other study ID #: AP2006-01
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• First received: April 30, 2007
• Last updated: April 24, 2008
• Start date: March 2007
• Est. completion date: April 2008

Study information

• Verified date: April 2008
• Source: Applied Physiology Pty Ltd
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A multicentre, open, RCT to assess the safety and efficacy of the Navigator Guided Circulatory Management System versus conventional care in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that the real time acquisition and subsequent processing and display of data produced by the Navigator guided circulatory management system provides the clinician with appropriate data and guidance to achieve and maintain a prescribed target haemodynamic stability in the post operative patient when compared to conventional care in an Intensive Care Unit setting.

Description:

Protocol No. AP2006-01

Study title: A Prospective, Open, Randomised, Multicentre, Controlled Group Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Navigator versus Conventional Care in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Grafting and or Heart Valve Repair or Replacement Utilizing Heart Lung Perfusion Pump.

Acronym: NAV 1

Type of study: Device Trial

Sponsor: Applied Physiology Pty Ltd

Study device: Navigator Guided Circulatory Care Management System

Route of Administration: Via Touch Panel Computer, externally connected to the bedside physiological monitor in a critical care environment

Study centres: Six Australian centres

Study design: Multicentre, open, randomised, controlled group study

Total sample size: One hundred completed patients, 50 in each arm

Study population: Post operative coronary bypass and heart valve repair or replacement patients admitted to a Cardiac Intensive Care or Intensive Care Unit. Surgery must involve the use of a heart lung perfusion pump and the patient must have a functioning arterial line and Swan Ganz catheter in situ to enable the measurement of Cardiac Output, Mean Arterial Pressure, and Right Atrial Pressure.

Study regimen: Following surgery, and after meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients will be randomised on admission to ICU to receive care guided by Navigator or conventional care during their ICU stay while CO is being monitored. All patients will be connected to the Navigator; the screen of the patients in the control group will have the graphical section blank, the right hand side will display actual values of MAP, CO and RAP as slaved from the bedside monitor, along with the patient's screening and randomisation number and initials. The arm of the study to which the patient has been randomised ;control/Navigator, will also be shown.

Endpoints:

Primary: The primary efficacy endpoint is the average distance to the central point of the target cardiovascular zone over the period the patient is connected to Navigator.

Secondary: Secondary endpoints for the trial will be:

• Percentage time in the target cardiovascular zone over the period the patient is connected to the Navigator

• Clinically significant atrial fibrillation over the period the patient is connected to the Navigator. This is defined as irregular supraventricular rhythm with an absence of discrete P waves lasting more than ten minutes documented and confirmed with an ECG

• Multiple organ function, as assessed using the SOFA score, calculated daily

• Navigator device related adverse events and device failures

Statistical analysis: The primary and secondary endpoints and all safety data will be analysed on the randomised Intention-to-treat population.The ITT population will include all individuals who are randomised. The analysis will compare the primary efficacy endpoint between the two randomised treatment groups using independent t tests. The secondary analyses will compare the secondary endpoints between the two randomised treatment groups using independent t-tests, Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests as appropriate.

Study Period: From the first pre-surgery screening visit to the post operative follow up visit, approximately six weeks

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 112
• Est. completion date: April 2008
• Est. primary completion date: April 2008
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Male or female aged 18 years or older

2. Undergoing elective cardiac surgery where surgery involves the use of a heart-lung perfusion pump

3. Will have an arterial line and Swan Ganz catheter in situ

4. Require invasive measurement of Cardiac Output (CO), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Right Atrial Pressure (RAP)

5. Are able and willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Women who are lactating or pregnant

2. Require Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

3. Present at baseline screening or immediately prior to randomisation in the ICU with atrial fibrillation (irregular supraventricular rhythm, not due to ectopic complexes with an absence of discrete P-waves lasting more than 10 minutes documented and confirmed with an ECG)

4. Intra-operative surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation

5. Surgery for left atrial reduction

6. Patients with left ventricular assist devices

7. Patients with permanent pacemakers in situ

8. Deemed by the investigator to be uncooperative or unsuitable for inclusion into this trial

9. Have a medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator would jeopardise the patient's safety by participating in this trial

10. Current participation in another drug or device study

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Critical Illness
• Intensive Care

Intervention

Device:
• Navigator
Navigator circulatory mgt system

Other:
• Conventional care
Conventional haemodynamic care

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Australia	Monash Medical Centre	Melbourne	Victoria
Australia	The Alfred Hospital	Melbourne	Victoria
Australia	Royal North Shore Hospital	Sydney	New South Wales
Australia	St George Public Hospital	Sydney	New South Wales
Australia	St Vincent's Public Hospital	Sydney	New South Wales
Australia	Westmead Private Hospital	Sydney	New South Wales
Australia	Westmead Public Hospital	Sydney	New South Wales

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Applied Physiology Pty Ltd	Trident Clinical Research Pty Ltd

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Australia, 

References & Publications (1)

Parkin WG. Volume state control - a new approach. Crit Care Resusc. 1999 Sep;1(3):311-21. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Average distance to central point of the target cardiovascular zone while connected to the device		Time connected to Navigator device	No
Secondary	Percentage time in the target cardiovascular zone while connected to device		Time connected to Navigator device	No
Secondary	Clinically significant AF while connected to device		Time connected to Navigator device	No
Secondary	Multiple organ function (SOFA score)		From connection to Navigator device to hospital discharge	Yes
Secondary	Device-related adverse events and device failures		Time connected to Navigator device	Yes