Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03264053
Other study ID # CEBD-CU-2017-08-03
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received August 16, 2017
Last updated September 14, 2017
Start date August 20, 2017
Est. completion date December 1, 2018

Study information

Verified date September 2017
Source Cairo University
Contact Abdullah A Mattar, A. Lecturer
Phone 00201010022987
Email dr_abdullah.mattar@hotmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Buccal bone is prone to resorb after tooth extraction specially with immediate tooth implantation which could compromise the esthetics of the patient. socket shield technique retains the buccal aspect of the extracted root fragment which may help in preventing the buccal bone from resorbing and prevent esthetics deterioration


Description:

The alveolar ridge resorbs and collapses following tooth removal which continues to be a major concern for practitioners. Many researchers concluded that buccal aspect of the ridge is more prone to resorption, as it is primarily supplied by the periodontal tissues and ligments of the tooth. Therefore, extraction of the hopeless tooth, may be a reason for buccal cortical plate resorbing at a faster rate than the palatal plate leading to its total degradation. This may lead to dimensional changes in the human ridge and the aesthetic area is highly affected by this process. Several techniques in the litreture were proposed to solve the problem of thin buccal bone resorption with or without immediate implantation in the aesthetic area. Some of these techniques are the guided bone and soft tissue regenraton and bone augmentation but proved to be slight aggressive with high morbidity rate. Recently, several papers were published concerning the socket shield technique explaining how to maintain the ridge width and height. Socket shield technique that was first introduced in 2010 aids at retaining the buccal fragment of root in place and intact thus placing the implant behind the lingual aspect of that fragment so that the periodontal ligments and tissues preserve its vitality and aids in preventing the collapsing of the buccal bone. This would help in improving aesthetics especially during immediate implant placment in the anterior maxillary region.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 86
Est. completion date December 1, 2018
Est. primary completion date August 20, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 20 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- • Humans

- Esthetic area (anterior and first premolars)

- Intact labial plate

- Hopeless tooth indicated for extraction and immediate implant placement

Exclusion Criteria:

- • Implantation after trauma

- Peri-implantits defects

- Use of barrier membranes(GBR)

- Socket preservation

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Socket shield
Socket shield is the Removal of the lingual portion of the anterior root thus retaining the lingual portion
Procedure:
Conventional immediate implantation
Conventional immediate implantation

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Cairo university Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Buccal bone resorption assesed by cone beam computed tomography as a measuring tool Measuring buccal bone loss after the procedure comparing between leaving the buccal portion of the root and extracting the whole root 12 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02761226 - Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Implant With or Without Platform Switching Design Phase 2
Completed NCT06095843 - "Bony Changes Around Dental Implant in Free Fibular Graft Versus Non-Vascularized Iliac Crest Graft" N/A
Completed NCT03544580 - Soft Tissue Esthetic With Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation Versus Conventional Immediate Implantation With Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone N/A