Outcome
| Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
| Primary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program on COVID patients's quality of life |
Physical component score of the Short-Form 36 health survey between the beginning and the end of the rehabilitation program (from 0 to 100; highers scores mean better outcome) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Physical capacities |
Number of repeated chair rises during 3 minutes |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Physical capacities |
Aerobic physical capacity using Eval-DM software |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Respiratory capacities |
Modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC) (from 0 to 4, highers scores mean worse outcome) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Respiratory capacities |
Modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC) (from 0 to 4, highers scores mean worse outcome) |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Respiratory capacities |
Modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC) (from 0 to 4, highers scores mean worse outcome) |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Respiratory capacities |
Borg scale (from 0 to 10, highers scores mean worse outcome) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Functional capacities |
Barthel scale (from 0 to 100, highers scores mean worse outcome) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Functional capacities |
Barthel scale (from 0 to 100, highers scores mean worse outcome) |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Functional capacities |
Barthel scale (from 0 to 100, highers scores mean worse outcome) |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
Weight loss |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
Weight loss |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
Weight loss |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
Body mass index |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
Body mass index |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
Body mass index |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
Muscular mass by brachial circumference or grip strength |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
SEFI® score (from 0 to 10, highers scores mean better outcome) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
SEFI® score (from 0 to 10, highers scores mean better outcome) |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Malnutrition prevalence rate using GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria |
SEFI® score (from 0 to 10, highers scores mean better outcome) |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of mortality |
Mortality rate |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of mortality |
Mortality rate |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of mortality |
Mortality rate |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Quality of life |
Score of the Short-Form 36 health Survey (from 0 to 100, highers scores mean better outcome) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Quality of life |
Score of the Short-Form 36 health Survey (from 0 to 100, highers scores mean better outcome) |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Quality of life |
Score of the Short-Form 36 health Survey (from 0 to 100, highers scores mean better outcome) |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Quality of life |
EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels surveys (from 0 to 1, highers scores mean better outcome) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Quality of life |
EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels surveys (from 0 to 1, highers scores mean better outcome) |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Quality of life |
EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels surveys (from 0 to 1, highers scores mean better outcome) |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Quality of life |
Proportion of patients returning to a professional activity |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Quality of life |
Proportion of patients returning to a professional activity |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Quality of life |
Proportion of patients returning to a professional activity |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Anxiety and depression |
Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale (from 0 to 42, highers scores mean worse outcome) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Anxiety and depression |
Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale (from 0 to 42, highers scores mean worse outcome |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Anxiety and depression |
Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale (from 0 to 42, highers scores mean worse outcome |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Anxiety and depression |
Pichot asthenia scale (from 0 to 32, highers mean worse outcome) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Anxiety and depression |
Pichot asthenia scale (from 0 to 32, highers mean worse outcome) |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Anxiety and depression |
Pichot asthenia scale (from 0 to 32, highers mean worse outcome) |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Healthcare consumption |
Number of consultations with the healthcare professionals |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Healthcare consumption |
Number of consultations with the healthcare professionals |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Healthcare consumption |
Number of consultations with the healthcare professionals |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Healthcare consumption |
Rehospitalisation rate (all causes) |
1 month |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Healthcare consumption |
Rehospitalisation rate (all causes) |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Healthcare consumption |
Rehospitalisation rate (all causes) |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Medico-economic evaluation |
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Impact of a multidisciplinary and personalized rehabilitation program in terms of Medico-economic evaluation |
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio |
6 months |
|
| Secondary |
Patient's opinion concerning the rehabilitation program |
Satisfaction questionnaire with open-ended questions (no specific scale is available) |
3 months |
|
| Secondary |
Patient's opinion concerning the rehabilitation program |
Satisfaction questionnaire with open-ended questions (no specific scale is available) |
6 months |
|