View clinical trials related to Covid19.
Filter by:The Emergency Endotracheal intubation of a patient who is COVID-19 positive is a high-risk procedure and an additional challenge to an intensivist due to barrier enclosures that have been developed to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission to healthcare providers during intubation. Although the incidence of difficult airways is commonly higher in critically ill patients, the evidence of severe hypoxemia without sign of respiratory distress could complicate the scenario.This silent hypoxia often leads to a delayed recognition of the severity of respiratory failure and to a late intubation which is often characterized by a high risk of complications related to the actual airways' management, hemodynamic and cardiac. It has been shown that non-survivors had worse blood gas analyzes than survivors, both before and after intubation. Few studies have reported the implications and adverse events of performing endotracheal intubation for critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs).
Covid-19 has increased organizational tensions within health services (lack of resources, difficulties in recruiting healthcare professionals , elderly and polypathological patients, etc.) and tested the reliability of health facilities. This project aims to draw lessons so that hospitals can transform themselves while improving their reliability to face future crises and other exceptional situations. Research hypothesis: Crisis management arrangements lack sensitivity to uncertainty, which manifests itself in lower quality of care and efficiency losses for the entire institution. The virtuous practices implemented during the crisis spontaneously incorporated principles of the highly reliable organization. The integration of principles from complexity theory into the management of institutions promotes high reliability organization. Sustaining these virtuous practices in order to anticipate and cope with crises requires the activation of two interconnected levers: a shared vision (by patients, healthcare professionals, ARS, HAS, and the Ministry in the first place) of the meaning of the action taken by hospitals, and the development of a policy enabling hospitals to become both learning and highly reliable. Main objective: To evaluate the management process of the Covid-19 epidemic by the university hospitals of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, and the structures linked to them (establishments in their territory, ARS, user associations), in terms of points of improvement and good practices. This evaluation concerns the preparation, management and exit phases of the crisis.
SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized mainly by moderate/severe pneumonia associated with progressive endothelial damage and coagulopathy. Acute respiratory failure among COVID-19 occurs in 42% of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, and 61-81% of patients requiring intensive care . Among the suggested treatments for the management of ARDS patients, prone position (PP) can be used as an adjuvant therapy for improving ventilation in these patients, as recommended in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 guidelines. Nevertheless, no data is currently available on application and feasibility of PP in invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 on their outcomes.
Chronically dialyzed patients and kidney transplant recipients have been identified as particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection due to unavoidable exposure. They have also high rates of comorbid conditions and have varying degrees of immunosuppression, which puts them at risk of developing very severe forms of COVID-19 disease with fatality rates varying from 16% to 32%. In such circumstances vaccination is the only chance to improve their extremely poor prognosis. There is very little published data on the response to vaccination in dialyzed patients and kidney transplant recipients so far. No data are available on the efficacy of vaccines against COVID-19 in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Furthermore, given the fact that disturbances of acquired immunity in dialyzed patients are many and diverse it is uncertain whether vaccinating against SARS CoV-2 in these population will result in sufficient immune response and, by consequence, protection against infection. Registration studies on the basis of which population vaccinations are actually conducted were performed only in the general population. There were no dialyzed patients and kidney transplant recipients in the study groups, so these patients are vaccinated with doses and schedules for people without chronic kidney disease. It is not known whether vaccination under such standard schedule produces a sufficient immune response in them and how long it lasts. That's why the aim of this study is to evaluate the humoral and cellular immune response after mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 with which patients treated with renal replacement therapy are vaccinated in Poland. It will be a prospective, observational controlled study conducted in patients treated with renal replacement therapy (hemodialyzed subjects, patients treated with peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplant recipients) vaccinated with mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 according to common rules and manufactures recommendations.The control group will be made up of sex and age matched people without chronic kidney disease.The first goal of the study is to analyze seroconversion rate and titer magnitude of neutralizing IgG and IgA antibodies directed against spike (s) SARS-CoV-2 antigen after the first and the second dose of mRNA vaccine as well as after 3, 6, 9, 12 months after vaccination. The second goal is to evaluate the cellular immune response tested using the ELISPOT method at the same time points as above.The immune response will be compared to patients without chronic kidney disease as well as between hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients.
This is a Phase 2 study to assess COVI-MSC in the setting of current standard of care in hospitalized subjects with RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection and acute respiratory distress / acute respiratory distress syndrome.
This pilot case-control study at Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (MGIMS), Sevagram, India is designed to evaluate the use of low dose radiotherapy (LDRT) in patients with moderate COVID-19 with specific objectives to abrogate the onset of cytokine storm and thus facilitate their early recovery and reduce mortality.
Corona Virus Disease or COVID-19 is caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus. There have been reports of serious COVID-19 illness in children. In addition it has been linked to clusters of children presenting with high fevers and inflammation. Sepsis, also called blood poisoning, is an abnormal response of the body to some infections. We aim to conduct research in children under 18 admitted to intensive care unit. Using a systems approach towards mapping the body's immune and metabolic responses to COVID-19 or related illnesses and compare with other sepsis like illnesses.
This study evaluates the feasibility of an early occupational therapy (OT) protocol in critical adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation with Covid-19.
This is a phase II randomized, single-blind dose study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of exosomes overexpressing CD24 of two doses, Dose 1 - 10^9 exosome particles (per dose) versus Dose 2 - 10^10 exosome particles (per dose), to prevent clinical deterioration in patients with Moderate or Severe COVID-19 infection.
Many people have long-lasting symptoms after COVID-19, such as breathlessness, fatigue and chest pain. So far, research studies of treatments for COVID-19 have focused on the life-threatening acute illness; few studies look at treatments to improve long-term health after COVID-19. COVID-19, particularly when this requires a hospital admission, can lead to weight loss and muscle wasting, contributing to worse outcomes. Muscle strengthening (resistance-based) exercise could improve outcomes in the long-term.