View clinical trials related to Covid19.
Filter by:The aim of this clinical trial of a fixed combination of standardized extracts from Rhodiola rosea roots, Schisandra chinensis berry and Eleutherococcus senticosus root (ADAPT-232) in COVID-19 patients is to demonstrate possible efficacy of adjuvant treatment with ADAPT-232 in decreasing the duration of the convalescence, alleviation of fatigue, headache, attention deficit, difficult and rapid respiration, depression, anxiety and other symptoms of Long COVID-19 during rehabilitation period.
With the unprecedented morbidity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the vaccine effectiveness needs to be assessed across diverse populations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in medical workers.
The newly recognised disease COVID-19 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which by early December 2019 had spread from China to the rest of the world, especially Europe, the United States, Latin America, and India, with over 86 million confirmed cases and over 1.870.000 deaths (5th January, 2021). The clinical spectrum of SARSCoV- 2 infection is wide, encompassing asymptomatic infection, mild upper respiratory tract illness, and severe viral pneumonia with respiratory failure and even death. According to retrospective data from China regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, at the time of admission to hospital, the most common symptoms were cough (67.8%), fever (43%), and fatigue (38.1%), and less frequently myalgia/arthralgia (14.9%), a sore throat (13.9%) and headache (13.6), while nausea or vomiting (5.0%) and diarrhoea (3.8%) were uncommon. Similar clinical characteristics are also encountered in European and US COVID-19 patients. Given the rising global death toll associated with the pandemic, in the past few months we have witnessed a race to find drug/biological treatments to save the lives of hospitalized, severely ill patients, as well as to develop vaccines. To this end, randomized clinical trials are underway to test experimental drug candidates, or repurposed medicines. At this time, it is crucial to focus on primary care physicians and initial mild symptoms at home in COVID-19 patients. Recently recommendations have been produced to treat this illness at home based on the pathophysiologic and the pharmacologic rationale and the available clinical evidence of efficacy in COVID-19 patients, including results of published clinical trials, for each of the recommended class of drugs. These recommendations have taken advantage from the long term experience of an infection disease specialist and other clinicians of Bergamo Hospital, who used their know-how and sound judgment to treat COVID-19 patients at home. Because the common early mild symptoms of COVID-19 highlight a systemic inflammatory process, there is the recommendation of using anti-inflammatory agents to limit excessive host inflammatory responses to the viral infection, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids. Moreover, COVID-19 is a particularly debilitating illness, and, apart from causing patients to be bedridden, there is evidence that in SARS-CoV-2 infection, dysregulation of the coagulation cascade and fibrinolytic system occur. Therefore, COVID-19 patients are exposed to the risk of thromboembolic events, independently of age, and anticoagulant prophylaxis is recommended, unless contraindicated. Comparative analysis of patient cohorts with long-enough follow-up in everyday clinical practice may offer a good alternative to randomized clinical trials to evaluate effectiveness of novel therapies. Thus, we will use this approach in an observational retrospective matched-cohort study to compare a cohort of COVID-19 patients treated at home by their family phisicians according to the proposed recommendations with another cohort of similar patients treated with other therapeutic regimens. Our working hypothesis is that following the recommendations the inflammatory processes and thus symptoms resolve faster than with other therapeutic approaches, while safe achieving similar rates of complete remission of the illness.
This study assesses the multidimensional health status of COVID-19 survivors one-year post-infection using validated subjective and objective measures.
The ongoing SARS-CoV2 or Covid-19 pandemic is causing a major global health crisis. In France, it prompted an urgent reorganization of the healthcare supply, mobilizing caregivers and hospital staff in a climate of uncertainty. Health services have been put to the test, some staff being on the front line, others having faced the reorganization of the health system necessitated by such a pandemic. Frontline caregivers have been compared to "fighters on the front lines." They encountered many difficulties, such as direct exposure to patients with a high viral load, exposure to the risk of contamination, physical exhaustion, reorganization of workspaces, adaptation to rigid work organizations, the management of the shortage of materials, the unusually high number of deaths among patients, colleagues or relatives, ethical questions relating to decision-making in a strained healthcare system. The psychological impact on these hospital staff is an indirect issue of such a pandemic in terms of mental health. The investigators have little data in the literature on the incidence of psychiatric episodes in the post-epidemic period. Work on the impact of two major pandemics of influenza A H1N1 (2009) and SARS-CoV-1 (2003) on the mental health of caregivers and other staff working in hospitals reports increased rates of mental disorders after discharge from anxiety-type crisis, depression and post-traumatic stress. This over-representation of mental disorders was still found several years after the epidemic. Similar results are emerging in recent studies involving hospital staff who were used in the Covid-19 crisis. These highlight a certain number of risk factors for the occurrence of these disorders (young age, nursing profession, underlying psychiatric pathology, exercise carried out in the first line of Covid).
Background: Influenza (flu) vaccinations are required for all NIH staff members who have direct contact with patients. COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for persons 6 months of age and older. Researchers want to learn about immunity in NIH staff members who get a flu and/or COVID-19 vaccine. Objective: To understand what happens to the body s immune system throughout the year after getting the flu and/or COVID-19 vaccine. Eligibility: Adults ages 18 and older who work at NIH and plan to get the current season s flu vaccine and/or COVID-19 vaccine. Design: Participants will not get any vaccines as part of this study. Participants will be screened with a medical history and medicine review. They will get a survey via email. It will ask about their flu and SARS-CoV-2 history and vaccinations. Participants will have 12 monthly visits at NIH. If during that year they get both flu and SARS-COV-2 vaccines, their participation will be extended. Once a month, participants will be contacted. They will discuss any new medicines, recent vaccinations, or changes in medical history. Once a month, participants will have blood drawn. Once a month, participants will have nasal sampling. A small, flat absorptive strip will be placed in the nostril to soak up mucus. Participants will press against the outside of their nostril with their finger for 1 minute. Participants may be able to collect samples at home and mail them to NIH if they are not able to visit in person. Participation will last for about 12 13 months.
- Phase 2 Study Objectives: efficacy and safety of of Reparixin treatment as compared to the control arm in adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia - Phase 3 Study Objectives: efficacy and safety of Reparixin treatment as compared to the control arm in adult patients with moderate or severe COVID-19 pneumonia
Patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to Covid-19 are often treated with oxygen delivered through a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). This is according to guidelines. We have made the clinical observation that oxygenation sometimes improves when a mask (e.g. oxygen mask or inhalation mask) is applied on top of the HFNC. This has quickly become a clinical routine at intermediary care units at our hospital, where patients with HFNC are offered to test the intervention (mask + HFNC) as part of clinical routine. This study aims to evaluate this new routine in a standardised way.
The LLS COVID-19 Registry is being amended to invite people who participated in the LLS COVID-19 Registry and did not develop antibodies after receiving a complete COVID-19 vaccination, as well as people with blood cancer who did not participate in the initial LLS COVID-19 Registry and also did not develop antibodies after receiving a complete COVID-19 vaccination, to participate in this amended LLS COVID-19 Registry.
Effects of telerehabilitation after discharge on quality of Life, psychosocial status, physical activity, daily activities of living, and sleep quality in patients treated as inpatients with the diagnosis of COVID-19 will be investigated. Post-discharge physical activity level, psychosocial status, sleep quality, quality of life, daily activities of living, and quality of life will be determined. The effects of exercise interventions in online-based physiotherapist monitoring will be provided. Monthly comparisons of physical activity, quality of life, depression, and sleep quality responses using telerehabilitation for three months following COVID-19 will be investigated.