View clinical trials related to Covid19.
Filter by:This study seeks to investigate the role of lung ultrasound in caring for Covid-19 positive patients and whether it can be used to predict patient deterioration. This information will be vital for healthcare workers who seek to identify Covid-19 pneumonia or patients at risk for deterioration early in the disease course.
In this study, the investigators propose to analyse the clinical data of all patients admitted in Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) or in a care center in Geneva who are diagnosed with COVID-19. CVD being one of the most important risk factors for developing a severe form of the disease, the investigators will explore the prognosis and clinical outcomes of those patients according to their CVD history as well as newly onset CVD during hospitalization. Moreover, as further evidence is needed on the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, the investigators will study prognosis and outcomes according to the patients' medications. Finally, the investigators propose to evaluate hospital length of stay and cost. The aim, therefore, is to collect information and scientific evidence from patients hospitalized and diagnosed positive for COVID-19, in order to evaluate if previous (or newly onset) CVD may influence outcomes and costs.
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Emergency Department (ED) are in front line for the reception of patients presenting COVID-19 symptoms and have to face a new situation given the expected number of patients. Staff participate in suspect patients triage, in the diagnosis and the management of Covid-19 patients, having to follow the instructions and recommendations that evolve in real time, depending on the stage, resources and means available. This situation requires that the staff immediately adaptation within this reorganization and redeployment of the activity. Then; they are subject to many stress and anxiety factors such as: - Increased activity: massive influx of patients, overload of work, lack of material and human resources - Modification of practices: training in procedures, measures isolation and prevention of contamination of other patients, replacement by professionals reassigned from other departments - Ethical dilemma: decisions to be made in an emergency, patient prioritization - Numerous, evolving information, from various sources and sometimes contradictory (national, governance, service, media) - Individual: fear of personal contamination and of those close to you, personal organization in a situation of confinement of the population, loss of usual social support - Anxiety and stress management of patients and relatives, their entourage and colleagues In this study, it is proposed to study the psychic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department staff.
This study aims to investigate outcomes and predictors of outcome after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy for severe acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 patients.
This study aimed to evaluate the anxiety and fear of infection between dentists working during the present corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to explore dentist's knowledge about various practice modifications and guidelines to fight the novel corona virus
The purpose of this study is to identify healthcare workers with SARS CoV 2 antibodies who have not been previously diagnosed and are presumed COVID-19 negative, then determine the level of immunity in this population which could inform further decisions about widespread antibody testing in a healthcare worker population.
This study is a randomized, double-blinded, and placebo controlled phase 1&2 clinical trial of the SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine manufactured by Sinovac Life Sciences Co. , Ltd. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the experimental vaccine in healthy elderly aged 60 years and above.
A multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of Convalescent SARS COVID-19 plasma versus Placebo to evaluate the effect between arms on an ordinal score of six mutually exclusive categories of clinical status at day 30 after study initiation.
Background: People who have had contact with a person with a known SARS-CoV-2 infection are being told to self-quarantine for 14 days. This is done to avoid potential virus spread. But the actual time it takes for a person to develop an infection after being exposed to the virus is not well known. The proper quarantine time could be less or more than 2 weeks. Researchers hope this study can be used to help improve public health guidelines for quarantines, social distancing, and returning to work after a possible SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Objective: To better understand how long it takes a person to develop (or not develop) an infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus after they have had contact with a person who has a confirmed infection. Eligibility: NIH staff members age 18 and older who had recent contact with a person who has a SARS-CoV-2 infection Design: Participants will have 3 study visits at the NIH Clinical Center. They may be asked to have an extra visit depending on the test results at the third visit. At each visit, participants will give a blood and saliva sample. It will be used to test for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Their temperature will be taken. They will complete a short survey to collect data about possible COVID-19 symptoms. At the first visit only, they will also complete a survey that asks about their recent social contacts. Two types of nasal samples will be collected at each visit. These samples will be tested for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 1. a swab will be inserted deep into the back of the nose and 2. a swab will be inserted to the middle of your nose. Participation lasts 3 to 4 weeks.
Novel therapies are desperately needed for treatment of COVID-19 patients. At present, there are no proven interventions to prevent progression of the disease or to rapidly treat patients with COVID-19 related respiratory failure. Data on the original coronavirus -SARS pneumonia suggested that high dose (>160ppm) inhaled Nitric Oxide could have beneficial effects also on COVID-19, due to the genomic similarities between these two coronaviruses (1-3). This study will test whether high dose inhaled nitric oxide is safe and can reverse virus burden and respiratory failure in patients on mechanical ventilation.