View clinical trials related to Covid19.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to understand if it is safe and useful to perform SGB (Stellate Ganglion Block) in patients who have severe lung injury Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 infection.
The primary objective of this study is to establish differences in susceptibility to SARS CoV-2 infection among health care workers (HCW) highly exposed to patients with COVID-19 diagnosis. To ascertain this issue, we evaluated: - Changes in receptor polymorphism (ACE2 and CD26 receptor study. - SARS-CoV-2 CD4/CD8 T cell response (CTL) - Different KIR phenotypes
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared in early 2020 the emergence of a new highly contagious SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus responsible for a global public health emergency. In France, the first cases of contamination have been reported since the end of January 2020, and the first death in mid-February 2020. Then, data published by Public Healh France reported an increasing and rapidly exponential number of contaminations. First cases have been identified on a cluster mode, then rapidly spreading in some French departments and regions, indicating rapid kinetics of virus spread. Given the magnitude of the situation both French territory and neighboring European territories (mainly Italy), the government mobilized the entire health system to critically manage this epidemic. This exceptional and unprecedented pandemic deeply impacted the health structures, disrupting healthcare organizations. All caregivers, including all student nurses, actively participated in the mobilization and strengthening of care teams. The health crisis exposed the population of caregivers to potentially traumatic events which can have major repercussions on their health state. The description and identification of the risk factors of the occurrence of post traumatic stress disorders in student nurses during the health crisis would allow to provide avenues for improving training devices and to facilitate health workers access to specific psychological care particularly dedicated to the student nurses population needs.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of APL-9 in adults with mild to moderate ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) caused by COVID-19 who are hospitalized and require supplemental oxygen therapy with or without mechanical ventilation. It is thought that COVID-19 activates the complement system, part of the immune system that responds to infection or tissue damage, and increases inflammation in the lungs. APL-9 has been designed to inhibit or block activation of part of the complement pathway, and potentially reduce inflammation in the lungs. Part 1 of the study is open-label to evaluate safety; all participants will receive APL-9 plus standard of care. Part 2 of the study is double-blind, randomized; participants will receive either APL-9 or the vehicle-control plus standard of care.
ACTT-2 will evaluate the combination of baricitinib and remdesivir compared to remdesivir alone. Subjects will be assessed daily while hospitalized. If the subjects are discharged from the hospital, they will have a study visit at Days 15, 22, and 29. For discharged subjects, it is preferred that the Day 15 and 29 visits are in person to obtain safety laboratory tests and oropharyngeal (OP) swab and blood (serum only) samples for secondary research as well as clinical outcome data. However, infection control or other restrictions may limit the ability of the subject to return to the clinic. In this case, these visits may be conducted by phone, and only clinical data will be obtained. The Day 22 visit does not have laboratory tests or collection of samples and is conducted by phone. The primary outcome is time to recovery by Day 29.
Background: COVID-19 virus infection differs among people. Some people have no or mild symptoms. For others, COVID-19 is life threatening and causes damage to the body s organs. Researchers want to better understand the virus to learn how to kill it. Objective: To understand how the COVID-19 virus causes wide differences in how sick one can become from the infection. Eligibility: People ages 18-80 with COVID-19 infection Design: Participants will be screened with a review of their medical records. Participants who enter the study at the beginning of their COVID-19 infection will stay in the hospital until they are healthy enough to go home. Those who enter after they have recovered may need to stay in the hospital 1-2 nights to perform the study tests. Participants will have MRI and CT scans of the brain, heart, and lungs. They will lie in a machine that takes pictures of the body. For the MRI, soft padding or a coil will be placed around their head and chest. They may receive a dye injected into a vein. Participants will have an ultrasound of the kidneys and heart. Participants will provide blood and urine samples. They will provide nasal swabs. Participants will have a bronchoscopy. A thin tube will be placed through the nose or mouth into the airway. Saltwater will be squirted into the lungs and removed by suction. Participants may provide a spinal fluid sample. A needle injected into the spinal canal will obtain fluid. Participants will have lung and heart function tests. At various points after recovery, participants will repeat many of these tests.
The purpose of this study is to determine if administration of angiotensin-(1-7) (TXA127) prevents acute kidney injury and deterioration into multi-organ failure in patients with severe COVID-19. Participants will undergo a 10-day treatment with either placebo or study drug. The drug will be administered intravenously for 3 hours once each day for 10 days consecutively.
The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that prophylaxis of severe COVID-19 patients with treatment dose LMWH leads to better thromboembolic-free outcomes and associated complications during hospitalization than prophylaxis with institutional standard of care with prophylactic to intermediate-doses of UFH or LMWH
Patients who are critically ill with COVID-19 requiring life support in an intensive care unit (ICU) have increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Currently the ICU community does not know what effect the disease, the ICU admission, physiotherapy interventions and life support have on their long-term quality of life and whether they can return to their pre-illness level of function following ICU. COVID-Recovery will describe the physiotherapy interventions delivered to critically ill patients with COVID-19. In survivors, COVID-Recovery will utilise telephone follow-up of ICU survivors to assess disability-free survival and quality of life at 6 months after ICU admission. Additionally, COVID-Recovery will identify if there are predictors of disability-free survival. COVID-Recovery will aim to select up to 300 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from ICUs in Australia. If they survive to hospital discharge, patients will be invited to receive a telephone questionnaire at 6 months after the ICU admission that aims to assess their long-term outcomes, including physical, cognitive and emotional function, quality of life, and whether they have been able to return to work following ICU discharge. To describe the experience of critical illness in survivors of COVID-19 and their family members. To explore and describe functional recovery, respiratory system function and respiratory health morbidity up to 6 months after ICU admission in persistently critically ill adults with COVID-19
December 2019 was the onset of an outbreak of an infection related to SARS-CoV-2, a new coronavirus detected in January 2020 and responsible for a disorder termed COVID-19. Since then, COVID-19 has spread worldwide and is responsible for an unprecedented pandemic with major threat on global health and social and economic stability. Covid-19 has a large spectrum of symptoms. Most patients experience mild or moderate flu-like disorder with cough, fever, and shortness of breath. More severe presentations may occur; patients sometimes develop an acute pneumonia that can lead to adult respiratory distress syndrome. A considerable number of publications have been released for the last 10 weeks to help physicians making diagnosis and treat patients. Chinese authors have extensively proposed description of the disease. As signs and symptoms are poorly specific, diagnosis mostly relies on detection of the virus by RT-PCR in the upper respiratory tract. Some uncommon images and localization are highly specific and sensitive on chest CT-scan, which is cornerstone for initial diagnosis. However, resources may lack during healthcare crisis and results of these investigations may be delayed or unavailable developper. Special attention should also be paid to usual laboratory analysis. Indeed, decreased lymphocytes and eosinophilic counts are frequently described as well as increase in D-dimers levels. Variation of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have been reported. Coronavirus may have cardiac tropism and changes in cardiac biomarkers concentration may occur. Therefore, some data suggest that values of routine biomarkers and blood cell count may assist physicians at bedside to support diagnosis of COVID-19. To face the outbreak, organization of emergency departments (ED) was mandatory to separate patients flows and avoid mixing patients with COVID-19 and others. Most patients visiting EDs dedicated to initial COVID-19 management suffered of pneumonia-like symptoms. Despite initial triage, patients had either COVID-19-related pneumonia either alternative diagnoses. We took advantage of this to evaluate the ability of routine biomarkers and leucocytes count helping identification of COVID-19 from alternative diagnoses.