View clinical trials related to Corona Virus Infection.
Filter by:Modulation of the renin angiotensin system by the chronic hepatitis C virus treatment either by (Daclatasvir and Sofosbuvir), (Daclatasvir and Sofosbuvir plus Ribavirin), or (Ribavirin and Interferon) protocols could give an explanation for the low incidence of COVID-19 among Egyptian population. Adding it may play a role in COVID 19 prophylaxis.
It is planned to include patients over 18 years of age of both sexes, admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Clinical Hospital Centre Split for respiratory insufficiency caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in need of invasive mechanical ventilation. The patients will be divided into four groups. Group 1 will receive N-acetylcysteine inhalation, Group 2 will receive inhalation with a 5% sodium chloride solution, and Group 3 will receive inhalation of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate, group 4 is a control group and will not routinely receive inhaled mucolytics preventively. All inhalations will be given twice a day 12 hours apart. The first inhalation will be included within 12 hours of the patient being enrolled in the Intensive Care Unit. Patients will be randomized according to the type of inhalation they will receive, randomization will be done by all researchers through the random.org website, and the inhalation will be given by a nurse according to the agreed protocol. RESEARCH GOALS The aim of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in the frequency and duration of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and whether there is a difference in the number of days spent on mechanical ventilation and in mortality in these four groups of patients. Hypothesis Coronavirus disease 2019 patients on invasive mechanical ventilation and preventive sodium bicarbonate inhalation will have a lower incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and fewer days spent on invasive mechanical ventilation than patients inhaled with N-acetylcysteine, 5% saline, or patients without preventive inhalation.
The COVID-19 coronavirus has led to a global pandemic of respiratory diseases with an increase in hospitalization and death risk. To keep COVID-19 manageable for healthcare, early treatment is urgently needed to avoid hospitalization. Dexamethasone can dampen the exaggerated cytokine response to COVID-19 and is a promising agent for preventing disease aggravation, hospitalization and death. However, the evidence on the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone treatment in primary care is inconclusive.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a threatening pandemic, due to its rapid transmission, uncertain risk factors for progression that lead to its lethality and yet unsatisfactory antiviral therapy or prophylaxis. The respiratory system remains the most frequently affected by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2), with patients either presenting mild illness as well as more severe complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that necessitates admission in Intensive Care Units (ICU). Unfortunately, the remaining patients progress to a second phase-called the inflammatory stage-featuring ARDS, thromboembolic events, and myocardial acute injury. These clinical exacerbation latter predicts poor prognosis associated with an exacerbation of the immune system cascade; a phenomenon known as "cytokine storm". In the context of COVID-19, the hyper inflammation diagnostic criteria are partly defined. Early studies of patients with COVID-19 established independent associations between biomarkers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein, interleukin [IL]-6, ferritin and D-dimer, and severe disease states that require respiratory support or result in death. The aim of this study was to identify practical blood immune- inflammatory biomarker / ratio that could be used alternatively to IL-6 for predicting severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) in clinical practice. Another aim is to unveil the association of the pro-inflammatory profile as categorized by the IL-6 levels in patients infected by SARS-COV-2, with disease severity and outcomes of COVID -19.
Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone which may have beneficial role in reducing COVID-19 adverse outcomes by first regulating the renin angiotensin system (RAS). Recent studies on animal in which acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was induced, showed that vitamin D lead to pulmonary permeability reduction by modulating RAS activity as well as the expression of the angiotensin-2 converting enzyme (ACE2). During COVID-19, downregulation of ACE2 leads to cytokine storm in the host, causing ARDS. In contrast, an experimental study conducted on mice in which ARDS was induced chemically, revealed that vitamin D admiration contributed to mRNA and ACE2 proteins levels improvement, ADRS milder symptoms as well as less lung damage. Additionally, vitamin D had shown antiviral effects on several previous studies, that though to be exerted either by antimicrobial peptides induction which subsequently had direct antiviral action or through immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. In addition, vitamin D stabilizes physical barriers which prevent viruses from reaching tissues susceptible to infection. Finally, previous studies demonstrated that hypovitaminosis D is accompanied by various comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and cancers, all medical conditions that are considered risk factors of COVID-19 infection deterioration and even high mortality rate. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether supplementation with high-dose vitamin D improves the prognosis of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 compared to a standard dose of vitamin D.
Since the end of 2019, Egypt and the whole world have been suffering from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), since the emergence of this new pandemic, there have been more than 97 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 patients and two million death globally; around 160 thousand of these cases are in Egypt. Recent clinical investigations found a high incidence of thrombotic complications in these patients, even with the standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a hypercoagulable state. Among the pathological sequel of COVID-19 infection, is the presence of a micro-thrombi in the pulmonary circulation which was shown in several autopsy studies. This thrombosis is believed to contribute to gas exchange impairment among patients with COVID-19 infection. Some observational studies have shown anticoagulation benefits with reduced mortality, mainly in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. However, these findings remain uncertain and need to be validated in further studies. This study is performed to evaluate whether therapeutic anticoagulation could improve COVID-19 patients' clinical outcomes compared to prophylactic anticoagulation in terms of improving gas exchange, reducing the need to maintain mechanical ventilation, shortening hospital admission period and mortality rate as well as recovering D-dimmer levels to its normal values.
Since the end of 2019, Egypt and the whole world have been suffering from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), since the emergence of this new pandemic, there have been more than 97 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 patients and two million death globally; around 160 thousand of these cases are in Egypt. Tocilizumab play role among the unique therapeutic alternatives for the management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a life-threatening complication of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) - T cell therapy. CRS occurs as a result of uncontrolled immune activation with release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Up till now, clinical trial and expertise with tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients has been limited. Despite preliminary encouraging results, recent studies suffered from limitations such as the absence of consistent treatment outline, a short post-treatment follow-up, and the absence of a comparison group. A recent study discussed the possible beneficial effect of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in severe COVID-19. Specifically, TNF may aggravate lymphopenia through direct killing via TNF/TNFR1 signaling in T cells, and T cell dysfunction reveals an important yet underestimated target for immunomodulatory therapeutic approaches. Accordingly, anti-TNF may be considered as an encouraging therapeutic option in severe COVID-19. These promising clinical findings encouraged us to use infliximab (IFX), a chimeric monoclonal anti-TNF antibody, as an experimental therapy in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 in the absence of IBD. In this study, we compare the outcomes of a large cohort of patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 pneumonia treated with tocilizumab in addition to standard management, with those of concomitantly hospitalized patients who received infliximab and tocilizumab in addition to standard management.
This Lucira COVID-19 All-In-One Test Kit performance study will be used to establish the performance of the Lucira COVID-19 All-In-One Test Kit as compared to a known high sensitivity RT-PCR molecular assay. The results of this study will be used to demonstrate the Lucira COVID-19 'swab to result in 30 minutes' test kit is similar in performance to known high sensitivity best-in-class molecular assays performed in high complexity labs. The results of this study will be combined with other studies the Sponsor has underway and will support a FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Lucira COVID-19 All-In-One Test Kit. This performance study will include nasal swabs self-collected by study subjects at community-based locations with trained medical staff. A subject's participation in this study will consist of one study visit and one collection event. The subject self-collects a nasal swab sample according to Lucira COVID-19 Test Kit instructions and runs test according to Quick Reference Instructions (QRI). Following the Lucira COVID-19 All-In-One Test Kit self-collection will be an additional swab collection for reference method testing. One (1) additional NS specimen will be collected either by the health care professional or self-collection, prepared in Transport Medium and sent to a reference laboratory.
To evaluate the performance of the FDA EUA authorized Lucira COVID-19 All-In-One Test Kit for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus in nasal swab samples as compared to a known high sensitivity EUA RT-PCR among asymptomatic individuals. The comparator assay for this study is the Hologic Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Assay.
Although clinical trials for approved COVID-19 vaccines demonstrated efficacy of the vaccine in preventing symptomatic infection, many questions about vaccine effectiveness, such as the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in preventing asymptomatic infection, a surrogate for transmission, and duration of protection, can only be evaluated in real-world trials. The objective of the study is to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (Pfizer vaccine, and, if available, Moderna vaccine) in preventing infection in healthcare personnel in Israel. HCP who are Clalit members and working in Soroka, Beilinson, Meir, Haemek, Kaplan and Schneider hospitals, 18 years or older, and eligible to get COVID-19 vaccine according to Ministry of Health guidelines, will be recruited, regardless of their intention to get the COVID-19 vaccine. A baseline serology sample and respiratory sample will be collected. Participants will be asked to provide a respiratory sample weekly for 3 months, and then monthly for the remainder of the study. Participants will also have blood drawn at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. Respiratory samples will be tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR; serology will be tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The study will last for 12 months. For each participant, data will be extracted from the Electronic Medical Record for the period of the study and retrospectively from 2010.