Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02405663
Other study ID # afhsr-1-3-2015
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received March 18, 2015
Last updated May 24, 2017
Start date April 2015
Est. completion date July 2016

Study information

Verified date May 2017
Source Benha University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To compare between the effect of controlled cord traction and manual removal of the placenta on blood loss among women undergoing caesarean sections


Description:

Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most commonly performed major abdominal operations in women worldwide and its rate is increasing dramatically every year.

Some of the reported short-term morbidities include hemorrhage, postoperative fever and endometritis. The method of delivering the placenta is one procedure that may contribute to an increase or decrease in the morbidity of CS.

On an average 0.5-1 liter of blood is lost during CS, many variable techniques have been tried to reduce this blood loss. Such techniques include finger splitting versus scissor cutting of incision, in situ stitching verses exteriorization and stitching of uterus , and finally spontaneous or manual removal of the placenta.

Two common methods used to deliver the placenta at CS are cord traction and manual removal.

Manual removal of the placenta which the obstetrician introduce his hand into the uterine cavity to cleave the placenta from the decidua basalis as soon as possible after the delivery of the infant and controlled cord traction in which the obstetrician do external uterine massage and gentle traction on the exposed umbilical cord to facilitate placental delivery.

Opinions differ about the best for placental delivery technique at CS. Some trials showed a reduced risk of blood loss with controlled cord traction (3) and others showed that manual removal of placenta at CS do not increase perioperative blood loss.

Authors concluded that manual delivery of the placenta was significantly associated with greater operative blood loss and greater decrease in postoperative hemoglobin levels and postpartum maternal infectious morbidity but with shorter operative time compared with spontaneous placental separation .

In addition, it is known that the blood loss at CS delivery is difficult to estimate, and numerous different methods including serial change in hematocrit (Hct), hemoglobin (Hb) level, visual estimation and the gravimetric method are described.

A low, but significant, correlation was found between visually estimated blood loss and perioperative hemoglobin change in women delivering by CS. However, hemoglobin , hematocrit levels and visual estimation are the most commonly used technique for estimating blood loss at delivery.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 288
Est. completion date July 2016
Est. primary completion date June 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 20 Years to 35 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- All informed and consented women undergoing elective or emergency CS will be legible for enrollment into the study

Exclusion Criteria:

- Multiple gestation.

- Pregnancy below 34 weeks.

- Severe maternal anemia.

- Severe pre-eclampsia

- Prolonged labor.

- Prolonged rupture of the membranes with fever.

- Placental abruption.

- Placenta previa.

- Placenta accreta.

- Clotting disorders.

- Current or previous history of a significant disease including heart disease, liver, renal disorders.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
manual removal
one of the standard procedures for placental delivery during caesarean section the surgeon will introduce his hand into the uterine cavity to cleave the placenta from the decidua basalis as soon as possible after the delivery of the baby
cord traction
one of the standard procedures for placental delivery during caesarean section the surgeon do external uterine massage and gentle traction on the exposed umbilical cord to facilitate placental delivery

Locations

Country Name City State
Saudi Arabia Postpartum ward of Armed Forces Hospital, Southern Region Khamis Mushait, Asir,

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Benha University Armed Forces Hospitals, Southern Region, Saudi Arabia

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Saudi Arabia, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary blood loss assessment after placental delivery Determine estimated blood loss after placental delivery either by cord traction or manually during caesarean section through comparing pre and postoperative hemoglobin and haematocrit measurements 12 hours
Secondary Placental delivery time. time needed to deliver the placenta calculated from time of full baby delivery to the time of full placental delivery 30 minutes
Secondary Duration of operation time calculated from first skin incision to the time of last stitch 2 hours
Secondary Need to use ecbolics documentation of the type, the dose of different ecbolics needed to stop any possible bleeding 30 minutes
Secondary Need of blood transfusion documentation of the need and the amount needed of packed red blood cells packs or any other blood products if patient general condition required 12 hours
Secondary Blood loss > 1000 ml counting down the cases of estimated blood loss more than 1000ml 12 hours
Secondary postoperative endometritis and puerperal pyrexia counting down the cases of puerperal pyrexia after exclusion of all other etiologies rather than endometritis one week
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03052699 - Medium and Long-term Complications of the Patients Having Had a Vaginal Caesarian in Hospital René Dubos N/A
Completed NCT01412073 - Control of Blood Loss During Caesarean Section Phase 3
Completed NCT01851187 - Effect of Perinatal Emotional Management on Maternal Emotion and Delivery Outcomes N/A
Completed NCT01890720 - Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Prevention of Postoperative Infections Following Caesarean Section N/A
Completed NCT02542748 - Comparison of Norepinephrine and Ephedrine on Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia in Parturients N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT02694653 - Preoperative Cesarean Section Intravenous Acetaminophen and Postoperative Pain Control Phase 1
Completed NCT01723605 - Insitu Repair Versus Uterine Exeriorization During Cesarean Section Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT01516697 - Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Obstetric Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT01741610 - Fluid Coloading and the Incidence of Hypotension Phase 4
Terminated NCT02838017 - Tissue Adhesive vs. Sterile Strips After Cesarean Delivery N/A
Completed NCT02587013 - Comparison of Uterine Repair Methods for Cesarean Delivery N/A
Terminated NCT02036697 - Hemodynamic Effects of Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section N/A
Recruiting NCT01954719 - Is Routine Cervical Dilatation Necessary During Elective Caesarean Section? A Randomised Controlled Trial N/A
Terminated NCT02799667 - Do Single Use Negative Pressure Dressings Reduce Wound Complications in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery N/A
Completed NCT02459093 - Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Skin Incision Closure Phase 4
Completed NCT01858467 - Supreme LMA and Endotracheal Intubation Use in Caesarean Section N/A
Completed NCT01891006 - Intervention for Postpartum Infections Following Caesarean Section N/A
Withdrawn NCT02893696 - Extra Sitting Time After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section and Fetal Well-being N/A
Completed NCT02785094 - Education and Social Media Versus Non-Indicated Caesarean Section Rate in Egypt N/A
Completed NCT02332278 - Early Oral Feeding Versus Traditional Postoperative Care After Cesarean Section. N/A