View clinical trials related to Colorectal Polyp.
Filter by:Randomised controlled trial comparing cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with cold snare EMR and adjuvant margin STSC in the complete resection of 15-40mm lateral-spreading adenomas
Many previous studies had revealed that gastrointestinal microbiome is changed compositionally and ecologically in patients with colorectal cancer comparing with healthy population. These finding provide us with a new sight to take advantage of gut microbiota. The current study aims to explore new potential biomarkers for early screening and prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer and colorectal polyps by analyzing metagenomics and metabolomics of gut microbiota.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become the third most common malignant tumor and is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. Adenomatous polyps of the colon are possible precursor lesions for CRC. Screening for CRC has been shown effective in preventing CRC and related deaths, especially colonoscopy and resection of adenomatous polyps. Currently, for intermediate sized polyps 5 - 20 mm hot snare polypectomy (HSP) with the use of electrocautery is conventionally used, causing relevant adverse events including haemorrhage and postpolypectomy coagulation syndrome, but is safe regarding complete resection of the polyp due to burning effect on residual tissue. On the other hand, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has grown popularity. Absence of electrocautery makes it technically easier and most important reduces adverse events. CSP is recommended as the preferred technique for polyps <5 mm by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. In literature, there is one multicenter trial from Japan recommending CSP for polyps 4-9 mm (average polyp size 5,4 mm) and only a few case studies for polyps 10-15 mm with inconsistent results, especially regarding the complete resection and pathological evaluation of the specimen. In this feasibility trial, the investigators try to find out if CSP with a new designed polypectomy snare is efficient and safe in terms of complete resection (R0), pathological evaluation and adverse events.
Bowel cancer is one of the most common cancers and the best method of diagnosing it is through endoscopic examination of the bowel (colonoscopy). Pre-cursors of bowel cancer are called polyps which can be detected and removed at the time of the colonoscopy. This reduces the chance of developing bowel cancer. There are different types of polyp ranging from completely harmless to those that may develop into cancer over time. Advances in technology mean more polyps are being detected and it is possible to predict the type of polyp. Therefore there is a new strategy in endoscopy whereby when a small polyp is detected, a prediction of polyp type is made, the polyp removed and then discarded rather than sending to the laboratory, thereby reducing costs to health services. In the hands of experts, accuracies in predicting polyp type is similar to when the polyp is removed and sent to the lab for analysis. Whilst experts can do this, non-experts cannot reach these standards and there is a need for effective training. The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of two training methods: Didactic face-to-face training and computer-based self-learning on the ability of trainees at predicting polyp type.
The primary aim of this study is - to explore the usefulness of re-examination and retroflexion on adenoma miss rate (AMR) in the proximal colon. Other aims include to explore the data below when re-examination or retroflexion is used. - Adenoma detection rate, ADR - Polyp miss rate, PMR - Polyp detection rate, PDR - Withdrawal time, WT