Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04349787
Other study ID # METC 2019-1231
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date November 26, 2019
Est. completion date March 8, 2020

Study information

Verified date April 2020
Source Maastricht University Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Primary, this study aims to develop and validate a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system for the characterization of colorectal polyps.

Second, this study evaluates the effect of using a clinical classification model Blue Light Imaging Adenoma Serrated International (BASIC) on the diagnostic accuracy of the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps compared to intuitive optical diagnosis for both expert endoscopists and novices.


Description:

Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps, the in-vivo characterization of the histology by endoscopists, is of increasing interest for clinical endoscopy practice. Recent studies have shown that thresholds for optical diagnosis are met in highly selected groups of expert endoscopists, but the same is not true in community endoscopy practices. In order to improve optical diagnosis, imaging enhancement techniques and the use of artificial intelligence are proposed.

This observational study developes a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system to differentiate between benign and (pre-)malignant CRPs, using state-of-the-art machine learning methods and deep learning architectures. For the development, HDWL and BLI images are used. The CADx is trained using histology as gold standard. The CADx is externally validated using on a set of 60 colorectal polyps. This study will evaluate if the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps can be improved with the aid of CADx.

In addition, both expert endoscopists and novices optically diagnose the colorectal polyps. In the first, pre-training phase, endoscopists optically diagnose colorectal polyps based on intuition. Afterwards, in the post-training phase, the same set of colorectal polyps is optically diagnosed based on a clinical classification system; BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification (BASIC). This study will evaluate if the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps can be improved with the aid of BASIC in both expert and non-expert hands.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date March 8, 2020
Est. primary completion date March 8, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with at least one colorectal polyp found and resected during colonoscopy in regular care;

- Availability of at least one high definition white light image and one Blue Light Imaging (BLI) image of the colorectal polyp;

- Overall high quality of the colorectal polyp image;

- Availability of the histological results of the colorectal polyp;

- Minimal age of 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Objection to participate in medical scientific research, reported in the medical file;

- Endoscopic instruments visible at the colorectal polyp image;

- More than one polyp visible at the colorectal polyp image.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx)
Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps made with computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) using state-of-the-art machine learning methods and deep learning architectures.
BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification (BASIC)
Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps made with BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification (BASIC), both by exert endoscopists and novices.

Locations

Country Name City State
Netherlands Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Limburg

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Maastricht University Medical Center Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Eindhoven University of Technology

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

References & Publications (3)

ASGE Technology Committee, Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, Chauhan SS, Hwang JH, Komanduri S, Manfredi M, Maple JT, Murad FM, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16. Review. — View Citation

Byrne MF, Chapados N, Soudan F, Oertel C, Linares Pérez M, Kelly R, Iqbal N, Chandelier F, Rex DK. Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model. Gut. 2019 Jan;68(1):94-100. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547. Epub 2017 Oct 24. — View Citation

Subramaniam S, Hayee B, Aepli P, Schoon E, Stefanovic M, Kandiah K, Thayalasekaran S, Alkandari A, Bassett P, Coron E, Pech O, Hassan C, Neumann H, Bisschops R, Repici A, Bhandari P. Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps with Blue Light Imaging using a new international classification. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Mar;7(2):316-325. doi: 10.1177/2050640618822402. Epub 2019 Jan 6. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Diagnostic accuracy of CADx versus endoscopists The diagnostic accuracy of characterizing colorectal polyps (into benign versus (pre-)malignant) made by CADx in comparison to the diagnostic accuracy of both expert endoscopists and novices. In which histology is the gold standard. 6 months
Secondary Diagnostic accuracy of BASIC versus intuition The diagnostic accuracy of both expert endoscopists and novices in characterizing colorectal polyps (into hyperplastic polyp, adenoma, sessile serrated adenoma, or adenocarcinoma) based on the clinical classification model BASIC, in comparison to the diagnostic accuracy based on intuition. In which histology is the gold standard. 6 months
Secondary Diagnostic metrics of CADx The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of characterizing colorectal polyps (into benign versus (pre-)malignant) made by CADx. 6 months
Secondary AUC of CADx Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) of CADx for characterizing colorectal polyps (into benign versus (pre-)malignant) made by CADx. 6 months
Secondary Diagnostic metrics of endoscopists The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of characterizing colorectal polyps (into hyperplastic polyp, adenoma, sessile serrated adenoma, or adenocarcinoma) of both expert endoscopists and novices. 6 months
Secondary Diagnostic metrics of endoscopists for high confidence diagnosis The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of both expert endoscopists and novices for optical diagnosis made with high (>90%) confidence. 6 months
Secondary Interobserver agreement The interobserver agreement of experts, novices and CADx for characterizing colorectal polyps. 6 months
Secondary Computation time of CADx The computation time per image of CADx for characterizing colorectal polyps. 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05400122 - Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT05551052 - CRC Detection Reliable Assessment With Blood
Completed NCT00098787 - Bevacizumab and Oxaliplatin Combined With Irinotecan or Leucovorin and Fluorouracil in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06037954 - A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT05425940 - Study of XL092 + Atezolizumab vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Phase 3
Suspended NCT04595604 - Long Term Effect of Trimodal Prehabilitation Compared to ERAS in Colorectal Cancer Surgery. N/A
Completed NCT03414125 - Effect of Mailed Invites of Choice of Colonoscopy or FIT vs. Mailed FIT Alone on Colorectal Cancer Screening N/A
Completed NCT02963831 - A Study to Investigate ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05489211 - Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03) Phase 2
Terminated NCT01847599 - Educational Intervention to Adherence of Patients Treated by Capecitabine +/- Lapatinib N/A
Completed NCT05799976 - Text Message-Based Nudges Prior to Primary Care Visits to Increase Care Gap Closure N/A
Recruiting NCT03874026 - Study of Folfiri/Cetuximab in FcGammaRIIIa V/V Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Patients Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03170960 - Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT03181334 - The C-SPAN Coalition: Colorectal Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation N/A
Completed NCT03167125 - Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention N/A
Recruiting NCT04258137 - Circulating DNA to Improve Outcome of Oncology PatiEnt. A Randomized Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05568420 - A Study of the Possible Effects of Medication on Young Onset Colorectal Cancer (YOCRC)
Recruiting NCT02972541 - Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Verse Surgery Alone After Stent Placement for Obstructive Colonic Cancer N/A
Completed NCT02876224 - Study of Cobimetinib in Combination With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Participants With Gastrointestinal and Other Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT01943500 - Collection of Blood Specimens for Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis N/A