Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial
— CTCSOfficial title:
Observational Study to Compare the Utilisation of CT Colonography With Optical Colonoscopy as the First Diagnostic Imaging Tool in Patients With Suspected Colorectal Cancer
This study aims to evaluate whether the use of Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC) for patients with low to intermediate risk of suspected colorectal cancer decreases overall NHS costs and waiting times whilst increasing patient satisfaction compared to clinical practice with utilisation of Optical Colonoscopy.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 246 |
| Est. completion date | September 2018 |
| Est. primary completion date | March 2018 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 40 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Every adult patient over 40 years old, presenting with constipation or alternating change in bowel habits, with a differential diagnosis of suspected colorectal cancer. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients presenting with anaemia; - Patients presenting with diarrhoea only for more than 6 weeks; - Patients presenting with rectal bleeding; - Patients who have undergone a previous whole-colon examination in the past 6 months; - Patients who have been referred for a whole-colon examination to follow up already diagnosed colorectal cancer; - Patients lacking capacity to give consent or participate in the study; - Patients already taking part in any clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product (CTIMP); - Prisoners - Patients who are not fluent in English. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust | London |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust | King's College London |
United Kingdom,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | 3-month cost analysis per patient undergoing either Optical Colonoscopy or CTC as the initial imaging modality (measured in £ per patient) | The primary outcome of this study is to investigate whether the investigation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer using CTC as the first diagnostic imaging tool is cost-saving at 3 months compared to optical colonoscopy. | 3 months following the initial imaging modality (either CTC or Optical Colonoscopy) | |
| Secondary | 6-month cost analysis per patient undergoing either Optical Colonoscopy or CTC as the initial imaging modality (measured in £ per patient) | This secondary outcome aims to investigate whether the investigation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer using CTC as the first diagnostic imaging tool is cost-saving at 6 months compared to optical colonoscopy. | 6 months following the initial imaging modality (either CTC or Optical Colonoscopy) | |
| Secondary | 3-month cost-effectiveness analysis per patient undergoing either CTC or Optical Colonoscopy as the initial imaging modality (measured in £ per QALY) | This secondary objective is aimed at evaluating whether the use of CTC as the initial imaging modality for patients with suspected colorectal cancer is cost-effective at 3 months compared to the use of Optical Colonoscopy. | 3 months following the initial imaging modality (either CTC or Optical Colonoscopy) | |
| Secondary | 6-month cost-effectiveness analysis per patient undergoing either CTC or Optical | This secondary objective is aimed at evaluating whether the use of CTC as the initial imaging modality for patients with suspected colorectal cancer is cost-effective at 6 months compared to the use of Optical Colonoscopy. | 6 months following the initial imaging modality (either CTC or Optical Colonoscopy) | |
| Secondary | Frequency of incidental findings using CTC as the initial diagnostic imaging tool (measured as a %, number of patients with incidental findings in CTC / number of CTC scans) | CTC has the potential to investigate other intra-abdominal organs that are not seen with optical colonoscopy. Hence, CTC scans might lead to extracolonic findings. This outcome aims to evaluate the percentage of CTC scans that lead to clinically significant findings. | Day 0 (following the initial CTC scan) | |
| Secondary | Likelihood ratio of CTC as the initial diagnostic imaging tool against the optical colonoscopy in patients with initial positive CTC findings for medium to large polyps and colorectal cancer (estimated using the p-value) | The likelihood ratio of CTC against colonoscopy in patients with initial positive CTC findings will be assessed using Colonoscopy as the gold standard. | 3 months | |
| Secondary | Time taken (measured in days) to reach a definitive diagnosis and first major treatment decision based on the the initial CTC scan in comparison to Optical Colonoscopy as the initial imaging modality. | This objective will measure the time elapsed from the referral to either Colonoscopy or CTC and the time: 1) the test is actually performed; 2) a definitive diagnosis is reached (Optical Colonoscopy will be considered the gold standard for patients presenting positive findings in the initial CTC); and 3) the treatment decision is reached. | 3 months | |
| Secondary | Do not Attend (DNA) or On the Day Cancellation rate associated with the pathway using Colonoscopy or CTC as the initial imaging test (measured as a percentage) | This objective aims to estimate the Do not Attend (DNA) or On the Day Cancellation (ODC) rate associated with the pathway using Colonoscopy or CTC as the initial imaging test. Given that the bowel preparation associated with CTC is easily tolerated, it is anticipated that the increase in CTC utilisation will lead to a decrease in DNA and ODC rates. | Day 0 (on the day of the CTC or Optical Colonoscopy scan) | |
| Secondary | Patient satisfaction associated with both clinical pathways (i.e. using CTC or Optical Colonoscopy as the initial imaging scan) | To evaluate and compare the levels of patient satisfaction associated with the two pathways: i) with CTC as the initial imaging scan; and ii) with Optical Colonoscopy as the initial imaging scan. Two patient satisfaction questionnaires (on the day and 3 months following the CTC/Optical Colonoscopy test) will be used to quantify patient satisfaction. | 3 months | |
| Secondary | Patient's self perceived quality of life - measured using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | This objective aims to evaluate the patient's self-perceived quality of life associated with both pathways using a standard questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). | 3 months | |
| Secondary | Cost per correctly diagnosed medium to large polyps (=6mm) and colorectal cancer using CTC as the initial investigation (measured in £ per patient) | The second outcome is to evaluate the cost per correctly diagnosed medium to large polyps (=6mm) and colorectal cancer using CTC as the initial investigation. For patients with positive findings on CTC (either medium to large polyps and/or CRC), optical colonoscopy will be used as the comparator to assess whether the initial diagnosis with CTC was correct. |
3 months |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT05400122 -
Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05551052 -
CRC Detection Reliable Assessment With Blood
|
||
| Completed |
NCT00098787 -
Bevacizumab and Oxaliplatin Combined With Irinotecan or Leucovorin and Fluorouracil in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06037954 -
A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05425940 -
Study of XL092 + Atezolizumab vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
| Suspended |
NCT04595604 -
Long Term Effect of Trimodal Prehabilitation Compared to ERAS in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03414125 -
Effect of Mailed Invites of Choice of Colonoscopy or FIT vs. Mailed FIT Alone on Colorectal Cancer Screening
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02963831 -
A Study to Investigate ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05489211 -
Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03)
|
Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT01847599 -
Educational Intervention to Adherence of Patients Treated by Capecitabine +/- Lapatinib
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05799976 -
Text Message-Based Nudges Prior to Primary Care Visits to Increase Care Gap Closure
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03874026 -
Study of Folfiri/Cetuximab in FcGammaRIIIa V/V Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT03181334 -
The C-SPAN Coalition: Colorectal Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03167125 -
Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04258137 -
Circulating DNA to Improve Outcome of Oncology PatiEnt. A Randomized Study
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05568420 -
A Study of the Possible Effects of Medication on Young Onset Colorectal Cancer (YOCRC)
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT02972541 -
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Verse Surgery Alone After Stent Placement for Obstructive Colonic Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02876224 -
Study of Cobimetinib in Combination With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Participants With Gastrointestinal and Other Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT01943500 -
Collection of Blood Specimens for Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis
|
N/A |