Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Resectability in Patients With Initially Unresectable Liver Metastases Secondary to Colorectal Cancer Receiving First-line Treatment Either With mFOLFOX-6 Plus Bevacizumab or FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab (OLIVIA)
| Verified date | November 2016 |
| Source | Hoffmann-La Roche |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | Austria: Ethikkommission |
| Study type | Interventional |
This 2 arm study will compare the resection rate of liver metastases and safety of surgery in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and primarily unresectable liver metastases receiving treatment with Avastin in combination with 5-FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin with irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) or without irinotecan (mFOLFOX-6) as first line treatment. Patients will be randomized to receive Avastin (5mg/kg iv every 2 weeks) in combination with each of these two standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens. The anticipated time on study treatment is until surgery, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal, and the target sample size is <100 individuals.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 80 |
| Est. completion date | October 2013 |
| Est. primary completion date | October 2013 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - adult patients, >=18 years of age; - unresectable liver metastasis secondary to cancer of colon or rectum; - scheduled for standard first line chemotherapy; - ECOG performance score of 0 or 1; - condition feasible for major abdominal surgery after first line treatment. Exclusion Criteria: - diagnosis of metastatic disease >3 months prior to study entry; - evidence of extrahepatic disease, diffuse peritoneal carcinosis or involvement of celiac lymph nodes; - prior systemic or local treatment of metastatic disease; - prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy completed within 6 months prior to study entry; - history or evidence of CNS disease unrelated to cancer. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Hoffmann-La Roche |
Austria, France, Spain, United Kingdom,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) Tumor | Following resective surgery, participants were evaluated for complete resection (R0) or the presence of microscopic (R1) or macroscopic (R2) residual tumor. The percentage of participants within each residual tumor classification was calculated as [number of participants with R0, R1, and/or R2 divided by the total number of participants] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method. | Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery) | No |
| Secondary | Time to Resection | Time to resection was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first resective surgery. For participants who did not undergo resective surgery, time to resection was censored at Day 1. Time to resection was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. | Up to 5 years (at Screening; prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; and at time of surgery) | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Histopathological Response | At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, where 'Complete response' was considered for those with 0 percent (%) viable tumor cells, 'Major response' for those with 1% to 49% viable tumor cells, 'Minor response' for 50% to 99% viable tumor cells, and 'No response' for 100% viable tumor cells. The response could not be determined in some cases and was documented as 'Unknown.' The percentage of participants within each response category was calculated as [number of participants with a given response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment] multiplied by 100. | Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery) | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Complete or Major Histopathological Response | At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, as described previously. The collective percentage of participants assessed as having a complete or major response was calculated as [number of participants with complete or major response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method. | Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery) | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following Curative Resection | Among participants with curative resection (complete resection [R0] or microscopic residual tumor [R1]), relapse was defined as the first new occurrence of cancer or death. The percentage of participants who experienced relapse was calculated as [number of participants with a relapse event divided by the number of participants initially classified as R0 or R1 following resective surgery] multiplied by 100. | Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually) | No |
| Secondary | Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) | RFS was defined as the time from curative resection (complete resection [R0] or microscopic residual tumor [R1]) to the date of first diagnosis of relapse. For participants with curative resection and without relapse, RFS was censored at the last known relapse-free assessment. RFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. | Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually) | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death or Disease Progression | PD was defined, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. The percentage of participants experiencing PD or death was calculated as [number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed] multiplied by 100. | Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2) | No |
| Secondary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS was defined, using RECIST version 1.0, as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD or death from any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For participants without documented PD or death, PFS was censored at the time of last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. | Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2) | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Died | Up to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually) | No | |
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. For participants without an event of death, OS was censored at the last-known alive date. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. | Up to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually) | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.0 | Using RECIST version 1.0, participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. The collective percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of CR or PR was calculated as [number of participants meeting RECIST criteria for CR or PR divided by the number of participants analyzed] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method. | Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2) | No |
| Secondary | Time to Response | Time to response according to RECIST version 1.0 was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented CR or PR. Participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. For participants who did not complete a confirmatory tumor assessment, time to response was censored at the date of last tumor assessment, or if unavailable, at the date of first dose. Time to response was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. | Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2) | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective Surgery | Complications related to the first resective surgery were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 3.0, and classified according to severity. The NCI-CTCAE severity classification criteria are as follows: Grade 5 equals (=) resulting in death; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 2 = moderate; and Grade 1 = mild. The percentage of participants experiencing a given adverse event (AE) by severity grade was calculated as [number of participants with an AE divided by the number of participants who underwent first resective surgery] multiplied by 100. | Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually) | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective Surgery | Complications related to the second resective surgery were evaluated using the NCI-CTCAE version 3.0, and classified according to severity. The NCI-CTCAE severity classification criteria are as follows: Grade 5 = resulting in death; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 2 = moderate; and Grade 1 = mild. The percentage of participants experiencing a given AE by severity grade was calculated as [number of participants with an AE divided by the number of participants who underwent second resective surgery] multiplied by 100. | Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually) | No |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT05400122 -
Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05551052 -
CRC Detection Reliable Assessment With Blood
|
||
| Completed |
NCT00098787 -
Bevacizumab and Oxaliplatin Combined With Irinotecan or Leucovorin and Fluorouracil in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06037954 -
A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05425940 -
Study of XL092 + Atezolizumab vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
| Suspended |
NCT04595604 -
Long Term Effect of Trimodal Prehabilitation Compared to ERAS in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03414125 -
Effect of Mailed Invites of Choice of Colonoscopy or FIT vs. Mailed FIT Alone on Colorectal Cancer Screening
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02963831 -
A Study to Investigate ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05489211 -
Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03)
|
Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT01847599 -
Educational Intervention to Adherence of Patients Treated by Capecitabine +/- Lapatinib
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05799976 -
Text Message-Based Nudges Prior to Primary Care Visits to Increase Care Gap Closure
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03874026 -
Study of Folfiri/Cetuximab in FcGammaRIIIa V/V Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT03181334 -
The C-SPAN Coalition: Colorectal Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03167125 -
Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04258137 -
Circulating DNA to Improve Outcome of Oncology PatiEnt. A Randomized Study
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05568420 -
A Study of the Possible Effects of Medication on Young Onset Colorectal Cancer (YOCRC)
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT02972541 -
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Verse Surgery Alone After Stent Placement for Obstructive Colonic Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02876224 -
Study of Cobimetinib in Combination With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Participants With Gastrointestinal and Other Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT01943500 -
Collection of Blood Specimens for Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis
|
N/A |